Factors Influencing Radiologic Technologists’ Commitment to Radiation Protective Equipment Utilization in Fluoroscopy Units: An Analysis Using the Health Belief Model Scale

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Radioprotection Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.1051/radiopro/2023046
N. Shubayr
{"title":"Factors Influencing Radiologic Technologists’ Commitment to Radiation Protective Equipment Utilization in Fluoroscopy Units: An Analysis Using the Health Belief Model Scale","authors":"N. Shubayr","doi":"10.1051/radiopro/2023046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to assess the perceptions of radiologic technologists towards the use of radiation protective equipment (RPE) in fluoroscopy units and to identify the Health Belief Model constructs, “perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy”, that predict RPE utilization among radiologic technologists. \nMethods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted among 228 radiologic technologists in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire that included socio-demographic characteristics, frequency of RPE utilization, and the Health Belief Model. Logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of RPE utilization. \nResults: The findings indicate that 63% of radiologic technologists reported always being committed to using RPE, while 37% reported not fully committed. Perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy showed significant associations with RPE utilization between the two groups of radiologic technologists: those who always use RPE and those who are not fully committed (p < 0.05). Logistic regression showed that perceived benefits were a significant predictor of RPE utilization (AOR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.60–0.67, p = 0.009), and type of hospital was also a significant predictor (AOR=0.09, 95% CI: 0.1–0.97, p = 0.047). \nConclusion: The study highlights the need for interventions to improve the consistent use of RPE among radiologic technologists in fluoroscopy units. Emphasizing the importance of RPE usage, addressing barriers, and providing adequate cues to action can help enhance radiologic technologists' commitment to using RPE and reduce radiation exposure risks. Tailoring interventions to the specific hospital setting and considering the perceived benefits of using RPE are crucial for promoting a culture of safety and accountability in different healthcare settings. \n","PeriodicalId":21009,"journal":{"name":"Radioprotection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radioprotection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2023046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the perceptions of radiologic technologists towards the use of radiation protective equipment (RPE) in fluoroscopy units and to identify the Health Belief Model constructs, “perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy”, that predict RPE utilization among radiologic technologists. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted among 228 radiologic technologists in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire that included socio-demographic characteristics, frequency of RPE utilization, and the Health Belief Model. Logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of RPE utilization. Results: The findings indicate that 63% of radiologic technologists reported always being committed to using RPE, while 37% reported not fully committed. Perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy showed significant associations with RPE utilization between the two groups of radiologic technologists: those who always use RPE and those who are not fully committed (p < 0.05). Logistic regression showed that perceived benefits were a significant predictor of RPE utilization (AOR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.60–0.67, p = 0.009), and type of hospital was also a significant predictor (AOR=0.09, 95% CI: 0.1–0.97, p = 0.047). Conclusion: The study highlights the need for interventions to improve the consistent use of RPE among radiologic technologists in fluoroscopy units. Emphasizing the importance of RPE usage, addressing barriers, and providing adequate cues to action can help enhance radiologic technologists' commitment to using RPE and reduce radiation exposure risks. Tailoring interventions to the specific hospital setting and considering the perceived benefits of using RPE are crucial for promoting a culture of safety and accountability in different healthcare settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响放射技师在透视室使用辐射防护设备的因素:使用健康信念模型量表进行分析
研究目的本研究旨在评估放射技师对在透视设备中使用辐射防护设备(RPE)的看法,并确定健康信念模型中的 "感知易感性、感知严重性、感知益处、感知障碍、行动提示和自我效能 "等建构,这些建构可预测放射技师对辐射防护设备的使用情况。研究方法对沙特阿拉伯的 228 名放射技师进行了横断面观察研究。研究采用自填式问卷收集数据,其中包括社会人口学特征、使用 RPE 的频率和健康信念模型。采用逻辑回归法确定使用 RPE 的预测因素。结果显示研究结果表明,63% 的放射技师表示始终致力于使用 RPE,37% 表示未完全致力于使用 RPE。在两组放射技师中,即始终使用 RPE 和未完全使用 RPE 的放射技师之间,感知到的严重性、感知到的益处、感知到的障碍、行动提示和自我效能与 RPE 的使用有显著关联(p < 0.05)。逻辑回归显示,感知到的益处是 RPE 使用率的重要预测因素(AOR = 0.20,95% CI:0.60-0.67,p = 0.009),医院类型也是重要的预测因素(AOR=0.09,95% CI:0.1-0.97,p = 0.047)。结论该研究强调,有必要采取干预措施,改善透视科室放射技师对 RPE 的持续使用。强调使用 RPE 的重要性、消除障碍并提供适当的行动提示,有助于增强放射技师使用 RPE 的决心并降低辐射照射风险。根据具体的医院环境调整干预措施,并考虑使用 RPE 的预期好处,对于在不同的医疗环境中促进安全和责任文化至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radioprotection
Radioprotection ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
54.50%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radioprotection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes (theoretical and practical aspects): dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments.
期刊最新文献
Young generations facing post-nuclear accident situations: from Chernobyl to Fukushima Le principe de limitation des doses et la tolérabilité du risque radiologique Evaluation of Barium sulfate-copper breast radiation shield for use in thoracic Computed Tomography Examinations Natural radioactivity and radiological hazards assessment in soil samples of Hassan district, Karnataka State, India Balancing precision and safety: the crucial imperative of radiation dose optimization in radiology and the role of certified medical physicists in quality assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1