Occupational recognition during the Covid-19 pandemic: differences between occupational groups and the association with compliance with infection control measures

Axel Babst, Martin Groß, Volker Lang
{"title":"Occupational recognition during the Covid-19 pandemic: differences between occupational groups and the association with compliance with infection control measures","authors":"Axel Babst, Martin Groß, Volker Lang","doi":"10.1515/zsr-2022-0112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper examines two research questions. First, we investigate whether specific occupational groups experienced changes in the recognition they received during the Covid-19 crisis. Second, we analyse whether occupational recognition can promote compliance with infection control measures. In addition, we distinguish between a micro-level of job recognition and compliance in the direct working environment on the one hand and a macro-level of recognition of occupational groups and general acceptance of infection control measures on the other. We find that health care occupations and “basic occupations” (essential occupations that do not require formal training) report an increase in recognition received by society during the pandemic, but still perceive the lowest levels of recognition overall. These groups also report lower levels of political recognition and do not feel adequately remunerated. Furthermore, occupational recognition has a positive impact on compliance with infection control measures. We identify institutional trust as the most important mediator. While occupational recognition in the immediate work environment has the greatest impact on micro-level compliance at the workplace, occupational recognition at the macro-level is relevant for accepting closures of public facilities, various restrictions and the intention to get vaccinated.","PeriodicalId":159136,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Sozialreform","volume":"88 5","pages":"329 - 357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Sozialreform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2022-0112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines two research questions. First, we investigate whether specific occupational groups experienced changes in the recognition they received during the Covid-19 crisis. Second, we analyse whether occupational recognition can promote compliance with infection control measures. In addition, we distinguish between a micro-level of job recognition and compliance in the direct working environment on the one hand and a macro-level of recognition of occupational groups and general acceptance of infection control measures on the other. We find that health care occupations and “basic occupations” (essential occupations that do not require formal training) report an increase in recognition received by society during the pandemic, but still perceive the lowest levels of recognition overall. These groups also report lower levels of political recognition and do not feel adequately remunerated. Furthermore, occupational recognition has a positive impact on compliance with infection control measures. We identify institutional trust as the most important mediator. While occupational recognition in the immediate work environment has the greatest impact on micro-level compliance at the workplace, occupational recognition at the macro-level is relevant for accepting closures of public facilities, various restrictions and the intention to get vaccinated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid-19 大流行期间的职业识别:不同职业群体之间的差异以及与遵守感染控制措施的关系
摘要 本文探讨了两个研究问题。首先,我们调查了特定职业群体在 Covid-19 危机期间所获得的认可是否发生了变化。其次,我们分析了职业认可是否能促进对感染控制措施的遵守。此外,我们还区分了微观层面的工作认可和直接工作环境中的遵守情况,以及宏观层面的职业群体认可和感染控制措施的普遍接受情况。我们发现,医疗保健职业和 "基础职业"(不需要正规培训的基本职业)在大流行期间得到的社会认可度有所提高,但总体认可度仍然最低。这些群体还报告了较低的政治认可度,并认为没有得到足够的报酬。此外,职业认可对遵守感染控制措施有积极影响。我们认为机构信任是最重要的中介因素。直接工作环境中的职业认可对工作场所微观层面的合规性影响最大,而宏观层面的职业认可则与接受公共设施关闭、各种限制以及接种疫苗的意愿相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Occupational health in slaughterhouses in Germany: translating political claims into Legal Language during the COVID-19 pandemic Occupational recognition during the Covid-19 pandemic: differences between occupational groups and the association with compliance with infection control measures Occupational health in a post-pandemic world of work. Introduction to this special issue Mental stress and resources in the sectors of IT services and social services – The potential of company occupational safety and health policy for developing health-promoting organisations Social partners and OSH: a multilevel and cross-country exploration in the hospital and social services sectors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1