Comparison of central corneal thickness and endothelial cell count among diabetic retinopathy and non-diabetic cases

Pranati Chaudhury, Anita Misra, Niranjan Puthal, Sasmita Sahoo, Bichismita Jena, Rajesh Panda
{"title":"Comparison of central corneal thickness and endothelial cell count among diabetic retinopathy and non-diabetic cases","authors":"Pranati Chaudhury, Anita Misra, Niranjan Puthal, Sasmita Sahoo, Bichismita Jena, Rajesh Panda","doi":"10.18231/j.pjms.2023.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Diabetes is associated with alterations in the structure and functions of corneal endothelial cells. Current research has been carried out to compare the central corneal thickness and endothelial cell density in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and non-diabetic (ND) individuals. : A Cross Sectional comparative research was carried out in a tertiary eye care hospital, over the period of two years from April 2021 to March 2023. Among 160 study participants, 80 cases with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and 80 non-diabetic (ND) cases as age matched control have been selected. Thorough Ophthalmic assessment was done. We have included only retinopathy cases as they have longer duration of diabetis and poorer metabolic control, for better comparison of the endothelium parameters with non-diabetics. Specular microscopy has been done in all cases for endothelial cell count evaluation and thickness of cornea has been estimated by Pachymeter. Statistical analysis was carried out by students‘t’ test by comparing the variables between two groups. : P-value was not significant for the mean age and sex distribution in the two groups. Mean endothelial cell density was lesser (2512.12±260.23cells/mm2) in DR than in ND group (2699.10±95.68cells/mm2). Mean central corneal thickness was greater (522.65±36.56μm) in DR than in ND group (486.50±18.67μm) (P<0.05). Also, the Co-efficient of variation percentage was more whereas the percentage of hexagonality was found to be statistically less in DR than ND group. Among DR patients, endothelial cell density was significantly reduced and central corneal thickness considerably raised when compared with ND. Our results also suggest that poor metabolic control and advanced Diabetic Retinopathy are risk factors for developing keratopathy.","PeriodicalId":30643,"journal":{"name":"PANACEA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES","volume":"31 122","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PANACEA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.pjms.2023.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Diabetes is associated with alterations in the structure and functions of corneal endothelial cells. Current research has been carried out to compare the central corneal thickness and endothelial cell density in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and non-diabetic (ND) individuals. : A Cross Sectional comparative research was carried out in a tertiary eye care hospital, over the period of two years from April 2021 to March 2023. Among 160 study participants, 80 cases with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and 80 non-diabetic (ND) cases as age matched control have been selected. Thorough Ophthalmic assessment was done. We have included only retinopathy cases as they have longer duration of diabetis and poorer metabolic control, for better comparison of the endothelium parameters with non-diabetics. Specular microscopy has been done in all cases for endothelial cell count evaluation and thickness of cornea has been estimated by Pachymeter. Statistical analysis was carried out by students‘t’ test by comparing the variables between two groups. : P-value was not significant for the mean age and sex distribution in the two groups. Mean endothelial cell density was lesser (2512.12±260.23cells/mm2) in DR than in ND group (2699.10±95.68cells/mm2). Mean central corneal thickness was greater (522.65±36.56μm) in DR than in ND group (486.50±18.67μm) (P<0.05). Also, the Co-efficient of variation percentage was more whereas the percentage of hexagonality was found to be statistically less in DR than ND group. Among DR patients, endothelial cell density was significantly reduced and central corneal thickness considerably raised when compared with ND. Our results also suggest that poor metabolic control and advanced Diabetic Retinopathy are risk factors for developing keratopathy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病视网膜病变与非糖尿病病例中央角膜厚度和内皮细胞数量的比较
:糖尿病与角膜内皮细胞结构和功能的改变有关。目前开展的研究旨在比较糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)患者和非糖尿病(ND)患者的角膜中央厚度和内皮细胞密度。 一项横断面比较研究在一家三级眼科医院进行,研究时间为 2021 年 4 月至 2023 年 3 月,为期两年。在 160 名研究参与者中,选择了 80 名糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)患者和 80 名非糖尿病(ND)患者作为年龄匹配对照。我们进行了全面的眼科评估。我们只纳入了视网膜病变病例,因为他们的糖尿病病程较长,代谢控制较差,以便更好地与非糖尿病患者的内皮参数进行比较。我们对所有病例都进行了镜检,以评估内皮细胞数量,并用角膜测厚仪估算角膜厚度。统计分析采用学生 t 检验,比较两组之间的变量:两组平均年龄和性别分布的 P 值不显著。DR 组的平均内皮细胞密度(2512.12±260.23 个细胞/平方毫米)低于 ND 组(2699.10±95.68 个细胞/平方毫米)。DR 组角膜中央平均厚度(522.65±36.56μm)大于 ND 组(486.50±18.67μm)(P<0.05)。此外,DR 组的变异系数百分比较高,而六边形百分比在统计学上低于 ND 组。与 ND 相比,DR 患者的内皮细胞密度明显降低,角膜中央厚度明显增加。我们的研究结果还表明,代谢控制不佳和晚期糖尿病视网膜病变是导致角膜病变的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
期刊最新文献
To study thyroid profile in CKD patients in Eastern Uttar Pradesh Scorpion sting among children with respect to its complications and outcome Donor notification and impact of counselling of reactive blood donors in the blood centre of a tertiary care teaching hospital of Odisha in eastern India To study the profile of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR) TB patients on shorter regimen at a tertiary care Centre of North India Retrospective analysis of acute appendicitis in COVID-19 pandemic – A clinical study of 100 cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1