When two banks fall, how do markets react?

IF 0.9 Q3 ECONOMICS Economics and Business Letters Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.17811/ebl.12.4.2023.331-341
Dora Almeida, A. Dionísio, Paulo Ferreira
{"title":"When two banks fall, how do markets react?","authors":"Dora Almeida, A. Dionísio, Paulo Ferreira","doi":"10.17811/ebl.12.4.2023.331-341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most recent fall of the Silicon Valley (SVB) and Credit Suisse (CS) banks increased the fear of a worldwide banking crisis. We analyse the impacts of their fall on five financial indices. We apply detrended fluctuation analysis, static and with sliding windows. We find a higher impact of the SVB fall on the efficiency dynamic of the studied indices, which revealed fluctuating efficiency and a loss of efficiency during the period of the falls. The fall of both banks contributed to some persistence in stock indices returns. The Nasdaq and STOXX Europe 600 Banks are the most and the least efficient indices, respectively. Despite the apparent evidence of inefficiency, it might not necessarily mean a capacity for abnormal profits.","PeriodicalId":43184,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Business Letters","volume":"18 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Business Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.12.4.2023.331-341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most recent fall of the Silicon Valley (SVB) and Credit Suisse (CS) banks increased the fear of a worldwide banking crisis. We analyse the impacts of their fall on five financial indices. We apply detrended fluctuation analysis, static and with sliding windows. We find a higher impact of the SVB fall on the efficiency dynamic of the studied indices, which revealed fluctuating efficiency and a loss of efficiency during the period of the falls. The fall of both banks contributed to some persistence in stock indices returns. The Nasdaq and STOXX Europe 600 Banks are the most and the least efficient indices, respectively. Despite the apparent evidence of inefficiency, it might not necessarily mean a capacity for abnormal profits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当两家银行倒下时,市场会如何反应?
最近硅谷银行(SVB)和瑞士信贷银行(CS)的倒闭加剧了人们对全球银行业危机的担忧。我们分析了这两家银行的倒闭对五个金融指数的影响。我们采用了静态和滑动窗口的去趋势波动分析。我们发现,SVB 的倒闭对所研究指数的效率动态影响较大,在倒闭期间,指数的效率出现波动和损失。两家银行的倒闭在一定程度上导致了股指收益的持续性。纳斯达克指数和 STOXX 欧洲 600 银行指数分别是效率最高和最低的指数。尽管有明显的低效率证据,但这并不一定意味着有能力获得非正常利润。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Economics and Business Letters is an open access journal that publishes both theoretical and empirical quality original papers in all economics and business fields. In addition, relevant discussions on current policy issues will be considered for the Policy Watch section. As general strategy of EBL, the journal will launch calls for papers for special issues on topics of interest, generally with invited guest editors. The maximum length of the letters is limited to 2,500 words.
期刊最新文献
A note on institutional trust and poverty: evidence from Latin America Online disinformation: an economic analysis A micro-foundation of a simple financial model with finite-time singularity bubble and its agent-based simulation Home-ownership and unemployment: revisiting the Oswald hypothesis from a regional heterogeneity perspective Does export intensity of heterogeneous firms affect leverage? Evidence from a small open economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1