Unpacking Online Collaborative Learning in Teaching EFL Speaking: Insights from Three Rural Area Case Studies

Ranta Butarbutar, F. Ruing, Nurfajriah Basri, Varissca Utari Tuharea, Seli Marlina Radja Leba
{"title":"Unpacking Online Collaborative Learning in Teaching EFL Speaking: Insights from Three Rural Area Case Studies","authors":"Ranta Butarbutar, F. Ruing, Nurfajriah Basri, Varissca Utari Tuharea, Seli Marlina Radja Leba","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The collaborative use of technology and online teaching and learning is a new pedagogical trend following the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. This pedagogy has created flexible learning modes for teachers and students to practice and develop their speaking skills in English as a foreign language through collaborative activities, interactive group projects, and peer feedback. Despite the plethora of studies pertinent to online learning, online collaborative learning (OCL) insights in rural areas are not well-documented, leaving knowledge gaps. Thus, a study of teachers' and students' perceptions of OCL in rural areas of Papua, Indonesia, is needed. Researchers have confirmed that the OCL is a new pedagogical approach to lifelong and sustainable learning. This study employed a qualitative report, using a triple-case study approach. The results propose that: (1) OCL can be implemented using two learning modes: synchronous and asynchronous. The WhatsApp group (WAG) chat feature was used to deliver written discussions and peer evaluations and the WhatsApp voice note tool to provide oral feedback synchronously. Google Classroom asynchronously provided the materials, tasks, and teacher feedback. (2) Teachers’ reasons for choosing OCL in EFL speaking courses include effectiveness, efficiency, interest, and engagement. Students’ perceptions highlighted the OCL effect in light of three aspects: (a) social, (b) psychological, and (c) speaking skills. (3) Teachers’ barriers during OCL implementation: (a) poor internet connection, (b) free-riders, (c) unpunctuality, and (d) unfamiliarity with technology use. (4) Teacher strategies to overcome the barriers to OCL: (a) university-sponsored internet, (b) OCL orientation at the beginning of class, (c) forming groups and choosing topics regarding students’ prior knowledge, (d) extra peer tutoring time, and (e) self-directed learning.","PeriodicalId":256338,"journal":{"name":"The Qualitative Report","volume":"6 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Qualitative Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The collaborative use of technology and online teaching and learning is a new pedagogical trend following the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. This pedagogy has created flexible learning modes for teachers and students to practice and develop their speaking skills in English as a foreign language through collaborative activities, interactive group projects, and peer feedback. Despite the plethora of studies pertinent to online learning, online collaborative learning (OCL) insights in rural areas are not well-documented, leaving knowledge gaps. Thus, a study of teachers' and students' perceptions of OCL in rural areas of Papua, Indonesia, is needed. Researchers have confirmed that the OCL is a new pedagogical approach to lifelong and sustainable learning. This study employed a qualitative report, using a triple-case study approach. The results propose that: (1) OCL can be implemented using two learning modes: synchronous and asynchronous. The WhatsApp group (WAG) chat feature was used to deliver written discussions and peer evaluations and the WhatsApp voice note tool to provide oral feedback synchronously. Google Classroom asynchronously provided the materials, tasks, and teacher feedback. (2) Teachers’ reasons for choosing OCL in EFL speaking courses include effectiveness, efficiency, interest, and engagement. Students’ perceptions highlighted the OCL effect in light of three aspects: (a) social, (b) psychological, and (c) speaking skills. (3) Teachers’ barriers during OCL implementation: (a) poor internet connection, (b) free-riders, (c) unpunctuality, and (d) unfamiliarity with technology use. (4) Teacher strategies to overcome the barriers to OCL: (a) university-sponsored internet, (b) OCL orientation at the beginning of class, (c) forming groups and choosing topics regarding students’ prior knowledge, (d) extra peer tutoring time, and (e) self-directed learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读 EFL 口语教学中的在线协作学习:三个农村地区案例研究的启示
在 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行病蔓延之后,协作使用技术和在线教学成为一种新的教学趋势。这种教学法为教师和学生创造了灵活的学习模式,通过协作活动、互动小组项目和同伴反馈来练习和发展英语口语技能。尽管有大量与在线学习相关的研究,但对农村地区在线协作学习(OCL)的见解却没有很好的记录,留下了知识空白。因此,有必要研究印度尼西亚巴布亚农村地区教师和学生对在线协作学习的看法。研究人员证实,OCL 是一种新的终身学习和可持续学习的教学方法。本研究采用了定性报告,使用了三重案例研究方法。研究结果表明(1) 可采用同步和异步两种学习模式实施 OCL。WhatsApp 群组(WAG)聊天功能用于同步提供书面讨论和同伴评价,WhatsApp 语音笔记工具用于同步提供口头反馈。谷歌课堂异步提供材料、任务和教师反馈。(2) 教师在 EFL 口语课程中选择 OCL 的原因包括有效性、效率、兴趣和参与度。学生的看法从三个方面强调了 OCL 的效果:(a)社交;(b)心理;(c)口语技能。(3) 教师在实施开放式协作学习过程中遇到的障碍:(a) 网络连接不畅;(b) 搭便车;(c) 不守时;(d) 不熟悉技术的使用。(4) 教师克服开放式协作学习障碍的策略:(a) 大学赞助的互联网,(b) 课堂开始时的开放式协作学习指导,(c) 根据学生的已有知识组成小组和选择主题,(d) 额外的同伴辅导时间,以及(e) 自主学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-Directed Learning in a Qualitative Research Methods Course for Doctoral Students Teaching Staff Mathematics University: Catalyst of the Emotional-Techno-Ontological Logic Navigating Credibility and Approachability in Conflict Zones: Insights from Fieldwork in Nigerian Communities Facing Eco-Violence Using Triangulation and Crystallization to Make Qualitative Studies Trustworthy and Rigorous Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Influence on Environmental Practices: Evidence from the Malaysian Aviation Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1