What are public preferences for air quality improvement policies? Additional information from extended choice models

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.3233/jcm-226980
Bowen Lei, Changlin Ao, Yuehua Wei, Yulin Long, Nan Jiang
{"title":"What are public preferences for air quality improvement policies? Additional information from extended choice models","authors":"Bowen Lei, Changlin Ao, Yuehua Wei, Yulin Long, Nan Jiang","doi":"10.3233/jcm-226980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effectively assessing public preferences for air quality improvement policies is extremely important to environmental policy formulation, but developing policies that cater to public tastes is a great challenge. Although the random parameters logit (RPL) model in the choice experiment is widely used in relevant studies, it remains limited in revealing additional preference heterogeneity. Given this, the study applies two extended models in exploring public preference heterogeneity for air quality policies. An RPL model with heterogeneity in means and variances (RPL-HMV) and an RPL model with correlated random parameters (RPL-CRP) are used to provide more beneficial insights for policy analysis. The study shows that better-educated groups are more willing to pay for increasing urban green coverage, and income increases the randomness of such preferences’ distribution among groups. From the perspective of preferences, reducing heavy pollution days is positively associated with decreasing morbidity of respiratory diseases caused by outdoor air pollution and negatively correlated with improving urban green coverage. In addition, compared to the RPL-CRP model, the willingness to pay in the RPL model is overestimated by 14.72%. The study further clarifies public preferences for air quality policies, and the extra information revealed by extended models provides more valuable references for policy-making.","PeriodicalId":45004,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering","volume":"29 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jcm-226980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effectively assessing public preferences for air quality improvement policies is extremely important to environmental policy formulation, but developing policies that cater to public tastes is a great challenge. Although the random parameters logit (RPL) model in the choice experiment is widely used in relevant studies, it remains limited in revealing additional preference heterogeneity. Given this, the study applies two extended models in exploring public preference heterogeneity for air quality policies. An RPL model with heterogeneity in means and variances (RPL-HMV) and an RPL model with correlated random parameters (RPL-CRP) are used to provide more beneficial insights for policy analysis. The study shows that better-educated groups are more willing to pay for increasing urban green coverage, and income increases the randomness of such preferences’ distribution among groups. From the perspective of preferences, reducing heavy pollution days is positively associated with decreasing morbidity of respiratory diseases caused by outdoor air pollution and negatively correlated with improving urban green coverage. In addition, compared to the RPL-CRP model, the willingness to pay in the RPL model is overestimated by 14.72%. The study further clarifies public preferences for air quality policies, and the extra information revealed by extended models provides more valuable references for policy-making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众对空气质量改善政策的偏好是什么?来自扩展选择模型的补充信息
有效评估公众对空气质量改善政策的偏好对环境政策的制定极为重要,但制定迎合公众口味的政策是一项巨大的挑战。虽然选择实验中的随机参数 logit(RPL)模型在相关研究中被广泛使用,但它在揭示额外的偏好异质性方面仍然存在局限性。有鉴于此,本研究采用了两个扩展模型来探讨公众对空气质量政策的偏好异质性。一个是具有均值和方差异质性的 RPL 模型(RPL-HMV),另一个是具有相关随机参数的 RPL 模型(RPL-CRP),为政策分析提供了更多有益的启示。研究表明,受教育程度较高的群体更愿意为增加城市绿化覆盖率付费,而收入增加了这种偏好在群体间分布的随机性。从偏好角度看,减少重污染天数与降低室外空气污染导致的呼吸道疾病发病率呈正相关,而与提高城市绿化覆盖率呈负相关。此外,与 RPL-CRP 模型相比,RPL 模型的支付意愿被高估了 14.72%。该研究进一步明确了公众对空气质量政策的偏好,扩展模型所揭示的额外信息为政策制定提供了更有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
152
期刊介绍: The major goal of the Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering (JCMSE) is the publication of new research results on computational methods in sciences and engineering. Common experience had taught us that computational methods originally developed in a given basic science, e.g. physics, can be of paramount importance to other neighboring sciences, e.g. chemistry, as well as to engineering or technology and, in turn, to society as a whole. This undoubtedly beneficial practice of interdisciplinary interactions will be continuously and systematically encouraged by the JCMSE.
期刊最新文献
Identification and modelling of parameters for the information-physical-social convergence characteristics of user-side flexible resources Application of Internet of Things and multimedia technology in English online teaching Research on prediction model of scaling in ASP flooding based on data mining Diversification of residents’ consumption structure based on ELES model Research on adaptive selection method of radiation sources in passive radar based on GNSS signal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1