Pengembangan Web Interaktif "Hai Si IPA" Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Di Sekolah Dasar

Dini Rosyada Mahmud, Arif Hidayat, Munzil Munzil, Muhibuddin Fadhli
{"title":"Pengembangan Web Interaktif \"Hai Si IPA\" Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Di Sekolah Dasar","authors":"Dini Rosyada Mahmud, Arif Hidayat, Munzil Munzil, Muhibuddin Fadhli","doi":"10.37329/cetta.v6i4.2818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The key to students facing challenges in the 21st century is insight and skills in science literacy. In Indonesian elementary schools, it is noted that students' science literacy is still not maximally utilizing digital technology to learn science and science learning outcomes are still low. Based on the results of observations and interviews in elementary schools, it was found that blog teaching materials had never been used on ecosystem material, so the researcher's goal was to develop a blog teaching material \"Hi Si IPA to improve the science literacy of grade V elementary school students. This research uses the ADDIE model (Analysis- Design- Development -Implement -Evaluate). Quantitative data analysis in the form of numbers from the results of expert validation of teaching materials, questionnaires of attractiveness, practicality, effectiveness, namely pretests and posttests. While qualitative data analysis is in the form of criticism and suggestions by teaching material experts, teachers, and students.  The results of teaching material expert validation are 81% with very valid criteria. The trial of the \"Hi Si IPA\" blog in a small group of 5 students with a questionnaire of students' initial knowledge and a pretest questionnaire the results were low, while the results of the student interest questionnaire were 89% with very interesting criteria. The field trial was 25 students in class V, the results of the student and teacher practicality questionnaire were 88.5%. Analysis of the increase in science literacy using the normality gain test from the pretest and posttest results of students was found to increase 84% with high criteria. So that the blog \"Hi Si IPA\" is feasible to use, attracts students' interest, is practical for learning, and can improve science literacy.","PeriodicalId":237101,"journal":{"name":"Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","volume":"11 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v6i4.2818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The key to students facing challenges in the 21st century is insight and skills in science literacy. In Indonesian elementary schools, it is noted that students' science literacy is still not maximally utilizing digital technology to learn science and science learning outcomes are still low. Based on the results of observations and interviews in elementary schools, it was found that blog teaching materials had never been used on ecosystem material, so the researcher's goal was to develop a blog teaching material "Hi Si IPA to improve the science literacy of grade V elementary school students. This research uses the ADDIE model (Analysis- Design- Development -Implement -Evaluate). Quantitative data analysis in the form of numbers from the results of expert validation of teaching materials, questionnaires of attractiveness, practicality, effectiveness, namely pretests and posttests. While qualitative data analysis is in the form of criticism and suggestions by teaching material experts, teachers, and students.  The results of teaching material expert validation are 81% with very valid criteria. The trial of the "Hi Si IPA" blog in a small group of 5 students with a questionnaire of students' initial knowledge and a pretest questionnaire the results were low, while the results of the student interest questionnaire were 89% with very interesting criteria. The field trial was 25 students in class V, the results of the student and teacher practicality questionnaire were 88.5%. Analysis of the increase in science literacy using the normality gain test from the pretest and posttest results of students was found to increase 84% with high criteria. So that the blog "Hi Si IPA" is feasible to use, attracts students' interest, is practical for learning, and can improve science literacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发互动网络 "Hi Si IPA",提高小学科学素养
学生面对 21 世纪挑战的关键在于科学素养方面的洞察力和技能。在印度尼西亚的小学中,人们注意到学生的科学素养仍然没有最大限度地利用数字技术来学习科学,科学学习的成果仍然很低。根据在小学的观察和访谈结果,研究人员发现博客教材从未在生态系统教材中使用过,因此研究人员的目标是开发博客教材 "Hi Si IPA",以提高五年级小学生的科学素养。本研究采用 ADDIE 模型(分析-设计-开发-实施-评估)。定量数据分析采用专家论证教材的结果、吸引力、实用性、有效性问卷,即前测和后测的数字形式。定性数据分析的形式是教材专家、教师和学生的批评和建议。 教材专家论证结果为 81%,标准非常有效。在 5 名学生组成的小组中试用 "Hi Si IPA "博客,对学生的初始知识进行问卷调查,并进行前测问卷调查,结果偏低,而学生兴趣问卷调查的结果为 89%,标准是非常有趣。实地试验对象为五班的 25 名学生,学生和教师实用性问卷的结果为 88.5%。从学生的前测和后测结果,利用正态性增益检验分析科学素养的提高,发现提高了 84%,标准很高。因此,博客 "Hi Si IPA "的使用是可行的,能吸引学生的兴趣,对学习是实用的,能提高学生的科学素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analisis Kurikulum pada Sistem Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar di Indonesia dan Jepang Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Carousel Feedback Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA melalui Pendekatan STEAM untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar pada Siswa Adi Widya Pasraman Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) Pada Adi Widya Pasraman Di Provinsi Bali Dengan Model Evaluasi Context Input Process Product (CIPP) Manajemen Inovasi Pendidikan dalam Perspektif Sekolah Efektif
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1