Continuous assessment and synthetic assessment – elements of pedagogical technique. Curriculum Case Study: Personal Development

Cristian Petre
{"title":"Continuous assessment and synthetic assessment – elements of pedagogical technique. Curriculum Case Study: Personal Development","authors":"Cristian Petre","doi":"10.47577/bspsychology.bsjop.v14i3.246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contemporary paradigm of the competence-centered curriculum associates an essential consequence at the level of the design, implementation and evaluation of school learning: the resizing of acquisitions in the form of knowledge, skills and attitudes (see Pre-university Education Law, 2023, art. 85). As a result, any finality expressed within the intended curriculum (represented by the school curriculum) in the form of the specific competence must be subjected to a pedagogical derivation approach to obtain the set of the three components. Through successive derivation steps, at a specific and operational level, the final portfolio of acquisitions will be established for each representative learning sequence (lesson), implicitly a lucid vision at the level of key contents, didactic strategies (and the methods derived from them), learning experiences and the micro-temporal resources corresponding to these resources. Like any rational human activity, the learning-teaching binomial is subject to an assessment approach, prioritized synchronously to avoid \"losses\" or \"falling behind\" and to ensure immediate optimizing interventions. Thus, an assessment will be practiced that will regulate and nurture learning in a continuous way, i.e. a formative assessment. The intention of this paper is to provide two planes of knowledge: a declarative knowledge and a procedural one. At the declarative level, a transparency of the formative evaluation is proposed, addressed both through its functions (observation-detection, adjustment-optimization, expansion-deepening), and through the forms of expression (continuous and synthetic). At the procedural level, a model-matrix is provided to ensure these evaluation approaches (continuous and synthetic), in relation to the three types of acquisitions derived from the specific competence (knowledge, skills, attitudes), within a curricular case study (Personal Development discipline).","PeriodicalId":388718,"journal":{"name":"The „Black Sea” Journal of Psychology","volume":"34 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The „Black Sea” Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47577/bspsychology.bsjop.v14i3.246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contemporary paradigm of the competence-centered curriculum associates an essential consequence at the level of the design, implementation and evaluation of school learning: the resizing of acquisitions in the form of knowledge, skills and attitudes (see Pre-university Education Law, 2023, art. 85). As a result, any finality expressed within the intended curriculum (represented by the school curriculum) in the form of the specific competence must be subjected to a pedagogical derivation approach to obtain the set of the three components. Through successive derivation steps, at a specific and operational level, the final portfolio of acquisitions will be established for each representative learning sequence (lesson), implicitly a lucid vision at the level of key contents, didactic strategies (and the methods derived from them), learning experiences and the micro-temporal resources corresponding to these resources. Like any rational human activity, the learning-teaching binomial is subject to an assessment approach, prioritized synchronously to avoid "losses" or "falling behind" and to ensure immediate optimizing interventions. Thus, an assessment will be practiced that will regulate and nurture learning in a continuous way, i.e. a formative assessment. The intention of this paper is to provide two planes of knowledge: a declarative knowledge and a procedural one. At the declarative level, a transparency of the formative evaluation is proposed, addressed both through its functions (observation-detection, adjustment-optimization, expansion-deepening), and through the forms of expression (continuous and synthetic). At the procedural level, a model-matrix is provided to ensure these evaluation approaches (continuous and synthetic), in relation to the three types of acquisitions derived from the specific competence (knowledge, skills, attitudes), within a curricular case study (Personal Development discipline).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续评估和综合评估--教学技巧的要素。课程案例研究:个人发展
当代以能力为中心的课程范式在学校学习的设计、实施和评价层面产生了一个基本结果:以知识、技能和态度的形式重新确定习得的规模(见《大学前教育法》,2023 年,第 85 条)。因此,在预定课程(以学校课程为代表)中以具体能力的形式表达的任何最终内容都必须经过教学衍生方法,以获得这三个组成部分的集合。在具体操作层面上,通过连续的推导步骤,将为每个有代表性的学习序列(课)建立最终的习得组合,这意味着在关键内容、教学策略(以及由此衍生的方法)、学习经验和与这些资源相对应的微观时空资源层面上的清晰愿景。与任何理性的人类活动一样,"学-教 "二元活动也需要进行评估,同步确定优先次序, 以避免 "损失 "或 "落后",并确保立即采取优化干预措施。因此,我们将采用一种能持续调节和促进学习的评估方法,即形成性评估。本文旨在提供两个层面的知识:陈述性知识和程序性知识。在陈述层面,本文提出了形成性评价的透明度,通过其功能(观察--检测、调整--优化、扩展--深化)和表达形式(连续和合成)加以阐述。在程序层面,提供了一个模型矩阵,以确保在课程案例研究(个人发展学科)中,针对从特定能力(知识、技能、态度)中获得的三种类型,采用这些评价方法(连续和综合)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The relationship between motivation and procrastination at work Counterproductive Work Behavior and Job Satisfaction The influence of loneliness at work on occupational depression Evaluating the correlation between self-esteem and the values of anxiety and depression respectively in an organizational context Emotion as a state/trait and loneliness of employees at work in multinationals in Constanta and Bucharest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1