Do green bonds reduce CO2 emissions? Evidence from developed and developing nations

IF 2.7 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS International Journal of Emerging Markets Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1108/ijoem-05-2023-0765
Rupjyoti Saha, S. G. Maji
{"title":"Do green bonds reduce CO2 emissions? Evidence from developed and developing nations","authors":"Rupjyoti Saha, S. G. Maji","doi":"10.1108/ijoem-05-2023-0765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe rapid global economic development in the last century, led by industrialization, brings environmental issues to the forefront as a serious concern. While some country-specific studies are undertaken to find the effectiveness of different mechanisms for funding environment-friendly projects, to the authors' knowledge, no study has been conducted to examine the impact of green bonds (GBs) on CO2 emissions for a global sample. Against this backdrop, this study examines the general impact of GBs on CO2 emissions and its differential impact for developed and developing countries and country categorizations based on sustainable development.Design/methodology/approachThe study selects a sample of 44 countries from 2016–2020. The authors use trend analysis and box plots to analyze the present GBs and CO2 emissions scenarios. Further, the panel data regression model is used to examine the overall impact of GBs on CO2 emissions and uncover the variation in such relationships regarding country-level economic and sustainable development. Generalized methods of moments (GMM) and instrumental variables (IV) models are used for robustness.FindingsThe yearly trend of GBs is upward at the global level, while CO2 emissions exhibit a marginal decline during the study period. However, significant variations are observed in such trends between developed and developing countries and country-level sustainable development. The authors' regression results show that GBs significantly negatively impact CO2 emissions globally. In addition, the effect of GBs on CO2 emissions is strongly negative for developing countries, while the same influence becomes weak for developed nations. Similar variations exist between countries based on sustainable development.Originality/valueThis is the first study in extant literature to examine such a relationship for a global sample of 44 countries. Further, this study makes a novel contribution by analyzing the variations in the GBs-CO2 emissions nexus for developed and developing countries and country-level sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":47381,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emerging Markets","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emerging Markets","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-05-2023-0765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe rapid global economic development in the last century, led by industrialization, brings environmental issues to the forefront as a serious concern. While some country-specific studies are undertaken to find the effectiveness of different mechanisms for funding environment-friendly projects, to the authors' knowledge, no study has been conducted to examine the impact of green bonds (GBs) on CO2 emissions for a global sample. Against this backdrop, this study examines the general impact of GBs on CO2 emissions and its differential impact for developed and developing countries and country categorizations based on sustainable development.Design/methodology/approachThe study selects a sample of 44 countries from 2016–2020. The authors use trend analysis and box plots to analyze the present GBs and CO2 emissions scenarios. Further, the panel data regression model is used to examine the overall impact of GBs on CO2 emissions and uncover the variation in such relationships regarding country-level economic and sustainable development. Generalized methods of moments (GMM) and instrumental variables (IV) models are used for robustness.FindingsThe yearly trend of GBs is upward at the global level, while CO2 emissions exhibit a marginal decline during the study period. However, significant variations are observed in such trends between developed and developing countries and country-level sustainable development. The authors' regression results show that GBs significantly negatively impact CO2 emissions globally. In addition, the effect of GBs on CO2 emissions is strongly negative for developing countries, while the same influence becomes weak for developed nations. Similar variations exist between countries based on sustainable development.Originality/valueThis is the first study in extant literature to examine such a relationship for a global sample of 44 countries. Further, this study makes a novel contribution by analyzing the variations in the GBs-CO2 emissions nexus for developed and developing countries and country-level sustainable development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色债券能减少二氧化碳排放吗?发达国家和发展中国家的证据
目的上世纪以工业化为主导的全球经济迅速发展,使环境问题成为人们严重关注的焦点。虽然一些针对具体国家的研究发现了不同的环境友好型项目融资机制的有效性,但就作者所知,还没有研究以全球样本为对象来考察绿色债券(GBs)对二氧化碳排放的影响。在此背景下,本研究考察了绿色债券对二氧化碳排放的总体影响,以及对发达国家、发展中国家和基于可持续发展的国家分类的不同影响。作者使用趋势分析和箱形图来分析目前的国标和二氧化碳排放情景。此外,作者还使用了面板数据回归模型来检验国标对二氧化碳排放的总体影响,并揭示了这种关系在国家级经济和可持续发展方面的变化。为了稳健起见,使用了广义矩方法(GMM)和工具变量(IV)模型。研究结果在研究期间,全球层面上的国标呈逐年上升趋势,而二氧化碳排放量则略有下降。然而,在发达国家和发展中国家之间以及国家层面的可持续发展之间,这种趋势存在明显差异。作者的回归结果表明,国标对全球二氧化碳排放有显著的负面影响。此外,国标对发展中国家二氧化碳排放的负面影响很大,而对发达国家的影响则很小。在可持续发展的基础上,各国之间也存在类似的差异。此外,本研究通过分析发达国家和发展中国家以及国家层面的可持续发展在 GBs-CO2 排放关系中的差异,做出了新的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
206
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of aggregate and sectoral time-varying market efficiency in the Russian stock market during the COVID-19 outbreak and the Russia–Ukraine conflict (RUC) Run, not walk: advanced red queen effect and mutual forbearance effect in multimarket contact Revisiting oil-stock nexus in the time of health crisis: a wavelet approach Rhetorical strategies in the climate change disclosures of Bangladeshi banking companies Exploring panic buying as a situational response – the role of fear, media exposure and context-specific paranoia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1