Variation in Hemoglobin A1c Linked to Hemoglobin S: Comparison of Analysis Results from ion Exchange Chromatography and an Immunoturbidimetric Method

N. Diouf, O. Boye, M. N. Coly, M. B. Touré, M. Djité, N. Coly, I. Soumah, F. Diedhiou, A. Samba, I. Faye, M. Guèye, H. Agossou, R. Ba, S. Thiam, A. Ndiaye, F. Cissé, F. Diallo, M. Sylla-Niang, A. Diatta
{"title":"Variation in Hemoglobin A1c Linked to Hemoglobin S: Comparison of Analysis Results from ion Exchange Chromatography and an Immunoturbidimetric Method","authors":"N. Diouf, O. Boye, M. N. Coly, M. B. Touré, M. Djité, N. Coly, I. Soumah, F. Diedhiou, A. Samba, I. Faye, M. Guèye, H. Agossou, R. Ba, S. Thiam, A. Ndiaye, F. Cissé, F. Diallo, M. Sylla-Niang, A. Diatta","doi":"10.9734/ajbgmb/2023/v15i4346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hemoglobin S can interfere with the measurement of glycated hemoglobin, an essential tool for diagnosing and monitoring diabetes. The objective of this study is to evaluate the analytical performance of  2 glycated haemoglobin assay methods. \nA prospective cross-sectional study was conducted where 186 patients (61 homozygous sickle cell disease, 61 AA type subjects and 64 AS type subjects) were recruited. Glycated hemoglobin was measured by immunoturbidimetry method and ion exchange chromatography. \nThe coefficient of variation (CV) of the repeatability is 2.34% and 1.13% (normal rate) ; 2.32% and 1.65% (high rate) respectively for the immunoturbidimetric method and ion exchange chromatography. In reproducibility, the CV obtained are 3.23% and 2.64% (normal rate) and 3.27% and 2.22% (high rate), respectively for the immunoturbidimetric method and the ion exchange chromatography. Linearity is satisfactory for both methods. Mean glycated hemoglobin values ​​show no significant difference (the P-value is equal to 0.09, 0.17 and 0.70 respectively in subjects AA, AS and SS) in the 2 methods for patients with the same hemoglobin electrophoretic profile. \nThe analytical performances of the 2 methods are good but their use is not recommended in the biological diagnosis of diabetes and pre-diabetes due to interference from hemoglobin S, especially in the case of homozygous sickle cell disease or in the case of composite heterozygosity.","PeriodicalId":8498,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","volume":"56 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajbgmb/2023/v15i4346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemoglobin S can interfere with the measurement of glycated hemoglobin, an essential tool for diagnosing and monitoring diabetes. The objective of this study is to evaluate the analytical performance of  2 glycated haemoglobin assay methods. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted where 186 patients (61 homozygous sickle cell disease, 61 AA type subjects and 64 AS type subjects) were recruited. Glycated hemoglobin was measured by immunoturbidimetry method and ion exchange chromatography. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the repeatability is 2.34% and 1.13% (normal rate) ; 2.32% and 1.65% (high rate) respectively for the immunoturbidimetric method and ion exchange chromatography. In reproducibility, the CV obtained are 3.23% and 2.64% (normal rate) and 3.27% and 2.22% (high rate), respectively for the immunoturbidimetric method and the ion exchange chromatography. Linearity is satisfactory for both methods. Mean glycated hemoglobin values ​​show no significant difference (the P-value is equal to 0.09, 0.17 and 0.70 respectively in subjects AA, AS and SS) in the 2 methods for patients with the same hemoglobin electrophoretic profile. The analytical performances of the 2 methods are good but their use is not recommended in the biological diagnosis of diabetes and pre-diabetes due to interference from hemoglobin S, especially in the case of homozygous sickle cell disease or in the case of composite heterozygosity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与血红蛋白 S 有关的血红蛋白 A1c 变异:离子交换色谱法和免疫比浊法分析结果的比较
血红蛋白 S 会干扰糖化血红蛋白的测量,而糖化血红蛋白是诊断和监测糖尿病的重要工具。本研究旨在评估两种糖化血红蛋白检测方法的分析性能。这项前瞻性横断面研究共招募了 186 名患者(61 名同种镰状细胞病患者、61 名 AA 型受试者和 64 名 AS 型受试者)。研究采用免疫比浊法和离子交换色谱法测量糖化血红蛋白。免疫比浊法和离子交换色谱法的重复性变异系数(CV)分别为 2.34% 和 1.13%(正常值);2.32% 和 1.65%(高值)。在重现性方面,免疫比浊法和离子交换色谱法的 CV 值分别为 3.23% 和 2.64%(正常值)以及 3.27% 和 2.22%(高值)。两种方法的线性度均令人满意。对于血红蛋白电泳图谱相同的患者,两种方法的平均糖化血红蛋白值无明显差异(P 值在 AA、AS 和 SS 受试者中分别等于 0.09、0.17 和 0.70)。这两种方法的分析性能良好,但由于血红蛋白 S 的干扰,尤其是在同型镰状细胞病或复合杂合的情况下,不建议在糖尿病和糖尿病前期的生物诊断中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Eleophorbia drupifera Leaves Extract on Some Biochemical and Haematological Parameters of Albino Rats Genetic Differentiation of Indian Zebu Cattle (Bos tauraus) Breeds Using Random Oligonucleotide Primers (RAPD-PCR) in Amravati Region, Maharashtra, India Antimicrobial Resistance and Phenotypic Detection of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase in Escherichia coli from Children with Cases of Diarrhea in Nasarawa-South, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Emerging Role of Probiotics in Advancement of Combating Physical Abnormalities and Diseases: A Systematic Perspective Analysis Spectral Characterization of Canarium ovatum Engl. (Pili) Pulp Extract from Allen, Northern Samar, Philippines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1