Sara Samur Ergüven, Selda Aksoy, M.fatih Şentürk, Aydın Ozkan, Çiğdem Yücel
{"title":"Investigation of the clinician satisfaction for the single-puncture and double-puncture arthrocentesis of temporomandibular joint","authors":"Sara Samur Ergüven, Selda Aksoy, M.fatih Şentürk, Aydın Ozkan, Çiğdem Yücel","doi":"10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1392259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinician satisfaction of single-puncture arthrocentesis and double-puncture arthrocentesis in cadavers. \nMaterial and Method: The study was conducted on 10 fresh cadaver temporomandibular joints bilaterally. Single-puncture arthrocentesis was randomly conducted on one side chosen by coin toss and double-puncture arthrocentesis on the other side. The main outcome variable was clinician satisfaction and measured using 0-10 point Likert scale. \nResults: Twenty arthrocentesis procedures were completed. The mean clinical satisfaction scores for single-puncture arthrocentesis and double-puncture arthrocentesis were 8.1 and 4.8, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the techniques in terms of main outcome variable, and it was significantly lower in double-puncture arthrocentesis (p=0.001). \nConclusion: Single-puncture arthrocentesis showed higher clinician satisfaction compared to double-puncture arthrocentesis.","PeriodicalId":500863,"journal":{"name":"Ado klinik bilimler dergisi","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ado klinik bilimler dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1392259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinician satisfaction of single-puncture arthrocentesis and double-puncture arthrocentesis in cadavers.
Material and Method: The study was conducted on 10 fresh cadaver temporomandibular joints bilaterally. Single-puncture arthrocentesis was randomly conducted on one side chosen by coin toss and double-puncture arthrocentesis on the other side. The main outcome variable was clinician satisfaction and measured using 0-10 point Likert scale.
Results: Twenty arthrocentesis procedures were completed. The mean clinical satisfaction scores for single-puncture arthrocentesis and double-puncture arthrocentesis were 8.1 and 4.8, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the techniques in terms of main outcome variable, and it was significantly lower in double-puncture arthrocentesis (p=0.001).
Conclusion: Single-puncture arthrocentesis showed higher clinician satisfaction compared to double-puncture arthrocentesis.