Replacement of Cheesecloth with Polyamide Plastic Micro-filters in the Manufacturing of Fresh White Boiled Cheese and Pasteurized White Brined Cheese

Ahlem Meddah, Ghadeer Mehyar, Salam A. Ibrahim
{"title":"Replacement of Cheesecloth with Polyamide Plastic Micro-filters in the Manufacturing of Fresh White Boiled Cheese and Pasteurized White Brined Cheese","authors":"Ahlem Meddah, Ghadeer Mehyar, Salam A. Ibrahim","doi":"10.35516/jjas.v19i4.431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cheesecloth used in cheese manufacturing has technical problems; provides low cheese yield and is difficult to clean and disinfect. The present study investigated the effect of substituting cheesecloth with multiple artificial polyamide plastic micro-filters (PPMFs) on the properties of fresh white boiled cheeses (FWBC) and pasteurized white brined cheeses (PWBC) and their whey. Whey was strained by either traditional cheesecloth (control; C) or by one of the PPMFs with different pore sizes (PPMF10, PPMF20, PPMF40, PPMF57 and PPMF 75). The yields of FWBC were 19.46%, 17.13 %, and 14.98% for PPMF10, PPMF20, and PPMF40, respectively. Slightly lower yields were obtained for the PWBC, and the control had the lowest yield (~11.1%). Using PPMFs with increased pore size in both cheeses reduced the total solids, fat, and protein contents. In the whey, reversed trends in the relationship were observed, indicating a loss of solids as fat and protein during the straining. Microbial analysis showed that PPMF cheeses had lower mesophilic aerobes and LAB counts than those of the control. Yeasts, molds, and Staphylococcus aureus were not detected (˂10 log cfu/g) in treatments or the control. In general, FWBC maintained lower microbial counts than PWBC, which was associated with the final boiling step in the FWBC. Cheesecloth maintained the highest microbial counts which would be indicative of the protective effect of cheesecloth on the bacterial cells and their spores. The customary cleaning procedure was not sufficient to eliminate microbial cells from the cheesecloth therefore could represent a source of contamination for cheeses. Acidity (as lactic acid) resulted from the growth of LAB, and PPMFs produced similar or better cheeses in terms of sensory analysis attributes compared to the control.","PeriodicalId":14707,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":"112 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjas.v19i4.431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cheesecloth used in cheese manufacturing has technical problems; provides low cheese yield and is difficult to clean and disinfect. The present study investigated the effect of substituting cheesecloth with multiple artificial polyamide plastic micro-filters (PPMFs) on the properties of fresh white boiled cheeses (FWBC) and pasteurized white brined cheeses (PWBC) and their whey. Whey was strained by either traditional cheesecloth (control; C) or by one of the PPMFs with different pore sizes (PPMF10, PPMF20, PPMF40, PPMF57 and PPMF 75). The yields of FWBC were 19.46%, 17.13 %, and 14.98% for PPMF10, PPMF20, and PPMF40, respectively. Slightly lower yields were obtained for the PWBC, and the control had the lowest yield (~11.1%). Using PPMFs with increased pore size in both cheeses reduced the total solids, fat, and protein contents. In the whey, reversed trends in the relationship were observed, indicating a loss of solids as fat and protein during the straining. Microbial analysis showed that PPMF cheeses had lower mesophilic aerobes and LAB counts than those of the control. Yeasts, molds, and Staphylococcus aureus were not detected (˂10 log cfu/g) in treatments or the control. In general, FWBC maintained lower microbial counts than PWBC, which was associated with the final boiling step in the FWBC. Cheesecloth maintained the highest microbial counts which would be indicative of the protective effect of cheesecloth on the bacterial cells and their spores. The customary cleaning procedure was not sufficient to eliminate microbial cells from the cheesecloth therefore could represent a source of contamination for cheeses. Acidity (as lactic acid) resulted from the growth of LAB, and PPMFs produced similar or better cheeses in terms of sensory analysis attributes compared to the control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在生产新鲜白煮奶酪和巴氏杀菌白卤奶酪过程中用聚酰胺塑料微过滤器替代奶酪布
奶酪生产中使用的奶酪布存在技术问题;奶酪产量低,而且难以清洁和消毒。本研究调查了用多个人造聚酰胺塑料微过滤器(PPMF)代替奶酪布对新鲜白煮奶酪(FWBC)和巴氏杀菌白卤奶酪(PWBC)及其乳清特性的影响。乳清用传统的奶酪布(对照组;C)或不同孔径的 PPMF(PPMF10、PPMF20、PPMF40、PPMF57 和 PPMF75)之一进行过滤。PPMF10、PPMF20 和 PPMF40 的 FWBC 产量分别为 19.46%、17.13 % 和 14.98%。PWBC 的产量略低,而对照组的产量最低(约为 11.1%)。在两种奶酪中使用孔径增大的 PPMF 会降低总固形物、脂肪和蛋白质含量。在乳清中,观察到了相反的关系趋势,表明在过滤过程中,固体损失为脂肪和蛋白质。微生物分析表明,与对照组相比,PPMF 乳酪的嗜中性需氧菌和嗜酸乳杆菌数量较少。处理组和对照组均未检测到酵母菌、霉菌和金黄色葡萄球菌(˂10 log cfu/g)。一般来说,FWBC 的微生物数量低于 PWBC,这与 FWBC 的最后煮沸步骤有关。芝士布保持的微生物数量最高,这表明芝士布对细菌细胞及其孢子有保护作用。通常的清洗程序不足以消除奶酪布上的微生物细胞,因此可能成为奶酪的污染源。酸度(以乳酸计)来自于 LAB 的生长,就感官分析属性而言,PPMF 生产的奶酪与对照组相似或更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Water Management in Jordan: A Fresh Tomato Water Footprint Analysis Evaluating the Performance of the AquaCrop Model to Soil Salinity in Jordan Valley Evaluating the Performance of the AquaCrop Model to Soil Salinity in Jordan Valley Chemical and Functional Properties of Mahlab Tree (Prunus mahaleb) Exudate Gum Replacement of Cheesecloth with Polyamide Plastic Micro-filters in the Manufacturing of Fresh White Boiled Cheese and Pasteurized White Brined Cheese
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1