Artificial intelligence, algorithmic recommendation and decision-making in European Union law: analysis of the regulatory challenge and legal certainty

Júlio César Parente Patrocínio, Débora Barreto Santana de Andrade
{"title":"Artificial intelligence, algorithmic recommendation and decision-making in European Union law: analysis of the regulatory challenge and legal certainty","authors":"Júlio César Parente Patrocínio, Débora Barreto Santana de Andrade","doi":"10.51799/2763-8685v3n2005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of artificial intelligence has been developed since the beginning of computing in the 1950s, and, since the 2010s, it has advanced more quickly, contributing to various applications. Artificial intelligence applications bring benefits and uses to various social sectors and activities. It improves optimisation and efficiency of factories and companies, diagnosis and treatment of diseases and disabilities, automating activities, operation of social networks and e-commerce platforms, and viability of autonomous cars. It is also present in the operationalization of banks, pharmacies, military forces, education system, among many others. However, along with benefits, artificial intelligence has also generated risks for society and, consequently, litigation. These disputes have been submitted to courts in different countries, generating discussions about specific regulations. In this sense, this article aims to analyse cases involving artificial intelligence in using data, biometric monitoring, algorithmic recommendation and decision-making discussed in European judicial and administrative lawsuits, as well as study the three main European Union regulations which approach that theme: the General Data Protection Regulation, the Digital Services Act, and the Artificial Intelligence Act Proposal.","PeriodicalId":171261,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of European Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51799/2763-8685v3n2005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of artificial intelligence has been developed since the beginning of computing in the 1950s, and, since the 2010s, it has advanced more quickly, contributing to various applications. Artificial intelligence applications bring benefits and uses to various social sectors and activities. It improves optimisation and efficiency of factories and companies, diagnosis and treatment of diseases and disabilities, automating activities, operation of social networks and e-commerce platforms, and viability of autonomous cars. It is also present in the operationalization of banks, pharmacies, military forces, education system, among many others. However, along with benefits, artificial intelligence has also generated risks for society and, consequently, litigation. These disputes have been submitted to courts in different countries, generating discussions about specific regulations. In this sense, this article aims to analyse cases involving artificial intelligence in using data, biometric monitoring, algorithmic recommendation and decision-making discussed in European judicial and administrative lawsuits, as well as study the three main European Union regulations which approach that theme: the General Data Protection Regulation, the Digital Services Act, and the Artificial Intelligence Act Proposal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟法律中的人工智能、算法推荐和决策:监管挑战和法律确定性分析
自 20 世纪 50 年代计算机出现以来,人工智能的概念就一直在发展,自 2010 年代以来,人工智能的发展更加迅速,促进了各种应用。人工智能的应用为各个社会领域和活动带来了益处和用途。它提高了工厂和公司的优化和效率、疾病和残疾的诊断和治疗、活动的自动化、社交网络和电子商务平台的运营以及自动驾驶汽车的可行性。在银行、药房、军队、教育系统等许多领域,人工智能也在发挥作用。然而,在带来好处的同时,人工智能也给社会带来了风险,并因此引发了诉讼。这些争议已提交给不同国家的法院,并引发了关于具体法规的讨论。从这个意义上说,本文旨在分析欧洲司法和行政诉讼中讨论的涉及人工智能使用数据、生物识别监控、算法推荐和决策的案例,并研究欧盟涉及该主题的三大法规:《通用数据保护条例》、《数字服务法》和《人工智能法提案》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Justiça e redes sociais: modelos comparados de regulamentação da liberdade de expressão dos Magistrados entre tutela dos direitos fundamentais e estado de direito Development of artificial intelligence in the AI-Mandamus project: elements of developed know-how The biometric habeas data in the digital and algorithmic era in the European Union Solidarity and the protection of migrants under European Union law Data protection in Mercosur: current situation, perspectives and project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1