Emergencies in occupational medicine: the experience of an on-site medical office

B. Pârvu
{"title":"Emergencies in occupational medicine: the experience of an on-site medical office","authors":"B. Pârvu","doi":"10.2478/rjom-2023-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: Medical emergencies (ME) in the occupational medicine (OM) office represent an increasingly frequent challenge, because they may require treatment or an ambulance, involving monitoring the patient, halting scheduled activity. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to study ME in the on-site medical office of a local pharmaceutical company, with an emphasis on the differences between major and minor emergencies, and on the factors associated with a longer duration of consultations, in order to optimize management. Methods: ME in the on-site office of a local company, January - June 2023 (109 working days), were recorded. The presentations were divided into 2 groups (G): G1 - ME that required ambulance/hospitalization/immediate treatment (etiological and/or symptomatic) and G2 - ME without immediate intervention. Results: During the 109 working days analyzed, 173 consultations involved ME (12.5% of the total presentations), with a mean of 1.6 presentations/day, On the 62 days with ME, the average was 2.7 presentations/day. The presentations, with a mean age of 40.8 years and a female predominance (69.4%), were divided into 2 groups: G1 included 95 (54.9%) presentations with immediate intervention, G2 - 78 (45.1%). In G1, 8 (8.4%) presentations required ambulance to hospital, 39 (41.1%) received etiological treatment, and 76 (81.1%) symptomatic treatment. Presentations for infectious diseases in a pandemic context ranked first This emphasizes the role of the OM physician in assessing Covid-19 contacts/patients. An ME consultation lasted on average 16.2 minutes, with a maximum of 19.4 minutes (excluding Covid-19 rapid testing). The most frequent ME complaints/humors were of cardiovascular, neurological, digestive and musculoskeletal origin. The maximum duration was in cardiovascular disease, associated with each type of intervention (p<0.0001 in the 3 cases: ambulatory/symptomatic/etiological treatment). Conclusion: ME in the OM doctor’ activity are frequent, more so in middle-aged women, especially between 12:01-16:00. They add approximately 2-3 consultations daily, in addition to the scheduled ones (30-45 additional minutes). Most ME require medical intervention: treatment in the office/ambulance. Apart from the COVID-19 context, most ME were cardiovascular (most time-consuming), digestive, neurological, and musculoskeletal. The duration of emergency consultations, additional to appointments, could require dedicated intervals, in order not to overload the physician. A systematized analysis of ME, paralleled by a good feedback towards the employer, could favor an individualized approach and an optimized endowment of the office, allowing identification of undiagnosed chronic disease, which would enhance productivity.","PeriodicalId":488720,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Occupational Medicine","volume":"62 ","pages":"52 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Occupational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rjom-2023-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Medical emergencies (ME) in the occupational medicine (OM) office represent an increasingly frequent challenge, because they may require treatment or an ambulance, involving monitoring the patient, halting scheduled activity. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to study ME in the on-site medical office of a local pharmaceutical company, with an emphasis on the differences between major and minor emergencies, and on the factors associated with a longer duration of consultations, in order to optimize management. Methods: ME in the on-site office of a local company, January - June 2023 (109 working days), were recorded. The presentations were divided into 2 groups (G): G1 - ME that required ambulance/hospitalization/immediate treatment (etiological and/or symptomatic) and G2 - ME without immediate intervention. Results: During the 109 working days analyzed, 173 consultations involved ME (12.5% of the total presentations), with a mean of 1.6 presentations/day, On the 62 days with ME, the average was 2.7 presentations/day. The presentations, with a mean age of 40.8 years and a female predominance (69.4%), were divided into 2 groups: G1 included 95 (54.9%) presentations with immediate intervention, G2 - 78 (45.1%). In G1, 8 (8.4%) presentations required ambulance to hospital, 39 (41.1%) received etiological treatment, and 76 (81.1%) symptomatic treatment. Presentations for infectious diseases in a pandemic context ranked first This emphasizes the role of the OM physician in assessing Covid-19 contacts/patients. An ME consultation lasted on average 16.2 minutes, with a maximum of 19.4 minutes (excluding Covid-19 rapid testing). The most frequent ME complaints/humors were of cardiovascular, neurological, digestive and musculoskeletal origin. The maximum duration was in cardiovascular disease, associated with each type of intervention (p<0.0001 in the 3 cases: ambulatory/symptomatic/etiological treatment). Conclusion: ME in the OM doctor’ activity are frequent, more so in middle-aged women, especially between 12:01-16:00. They add approximately 2-3 consultations daily, in addition to the scheduled ones (30-45 additional minutes). Most ME require medical intervention: treatment in the office/ambulance. Apart from the COVID-19 context, most ME were cardiovascular (most time-consuming), digestive, neurological, and musculoskeletal. The duration of emergency consultations, additional to appointments, could require dedicated intervals, in order not to overload the physician. A systematized analysis of ME, paralleled by a good feedback towards the employer, could favor an individualized approach and an optimized endowment of the office, allowing identification of undiagnosed chronic disease, which would enhance productivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业医学中的紧急情况:现场医疗办公室的经验
摘要 目的:职业医学(OM)诊室中的医疗紧急情况(ME)是一项日益频繁的挑战,因为这些紧急情况可能需要治疗或救护车,涉及对患者的监护,使预定的活动停止。这项回顾性观察研究的目的是对当地一家制药公司现场医务室的医疗紧急情况进行研究,重点是大紧急情况和小紧急情况之间的差异,以及与就诊时间较长有关的因素,以便优化管理。方法:记录了 2023 年 1 月至 6 月(109 个工作日)当地一家公司现场办公室的 ME。病例分为两组(G):G1 - 需要救护车/住院/立即治疗(病因和/或症状)的 ME;G2 - 无需立即干预的 ME。结果:在分析的 109 个工作日中,有 173 次就诊涉及 ME(占总就诊次数的 12.5%),平均每天 1.6 次;在 62 个有 ME 的工作日中,平均每天 2.7 次。就诊者平均年龄为 40.8 岁,女性占多数(69.4%),分为两组:G1 组有 95 例(54.9%)患者接受了即时干预,G2 组有 78 例(45.1%)患者接受了即时干预。在 G1 组中,8 人(8.4%)需要救护车送往医院,39 人(41.1%)接受了病因治疗,76 人(81.1%)接受了对症治疗。大流行情况下的传染病就诊率位居第一,这强调了主治医生在评估Covid-19接触者/患者方面的作用。一次 ME 咨询平均持续 16.2 分钟,最长 19.4 分钟(不包括 Covid-19 快速检测)。最常见的 ME 主诉/症状是心血管疾病、神经系统疾病、消化系统疾病和肌肉骨骼疾病。持续时间最长的是心血管疾病,与每种类型的干预措施有关(P<0.0001,3种情况:非住院治疗/症状治疗/病因治疗)。结论OM 医生活动中的 ME 频繁出现,中年女性尤甚,特别是在 12:01-16:00 之间。除了预定的咨询时间(增加 30-45 分钟)外,她们每天大约增加 2-3 次咨询。大多数急诊需要医疗干预:在诊室/救护车上进行治疗。除了 COVID-19 的情况外,大多数 ME 是心血管疾病(最耗时)、消化系统疾病、神经系统疾病和肌肉骨骼疾病。除了预约之外,急诊会诊的持续时间可能需要专门的时间间隔,以免医生负担过重。对 ME 进行系统化分析,同时向雇主提供良好的反馈,有利于采取个性化方法和优化诊室配置,从而发现未确诊的慢性疾病,提高工作效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emergencies in occupational medicine: the experience of an on-site medical office From Stone Grinder to Lung Transplant Candidate: A Young Worker's Battle with Silicosis The obstructive phenotype of chronic posttuberculosis disease - is there a role for the occupational exposure? A cross-national perspective on silicosis: incidence, occupational settings, and trends Evaluation of occupational and non-occupational risk factors associated with carpal tunnel syndrome-related symptoms in office workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1