{"title":"Impacto de la guardia de cardiología en el tratamiento de reperfusión de los pacientes con IAMCEST en un centro de segundo nivel","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rccl.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>The care of patients with cardiovascular disease by specialist in cardiology has shown better results in different spectrums. However, the presence of an on-call cardiologist is still rare in non-tertiary hospitals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>STEMI was recorded consecutively between 2006 and 2016 in a second level center. We analyzed and compared two periods: regional heart attack care network without a cardiology guard (2006-2011) and a second period (2012-2016) with both measures working.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1524 patients were included, 47.2% after the start of cardiology shift. We observed an increase in primary angioplasty (34.3% to 75.7%, <em>P</em> <<!--> <!-->.001) as well as a reduction in door-to-balloon time of 64<!--> <!-->minutes (220 [IQR, 167-290] to 156 [IQR, 130-197], <em>P</em> <<!--> <!-->.001). This translates into a shorter hospital stay as well as a reduction in complications during hospitalization, mainly recurrent ischemia. Although there is a trend towards lower hospital mortality, mortality during follow-up did not change with the cardiology guard.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The presence of a cardiologist on call increases the number of patients reperfused, and shortens the time until it. This translates into a shorter hospital stay, as well as lower short-term mortality. Our results indicate that the creation of the cardiological guard brings additional benefit to the care network for patients with STEMI.</p><p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: <span><span>NCT02501070</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36870,"journal":{"name":"REC: CardioClinics","volume":"59 3","pages":"Pages 159-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC: CardioClinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2605153223003345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objectives
The care of patients with cardiovascular disease by specialist in cardiology has shown better results in different spectrums. However, the presence of an on-call cardiologist is still rare in non-tertiary hospitals.
Methods
STEMI was recorded consecutively between 2006 and 2016 in a second level center. We analyzed and compared two periods: regional heart attack care network without a cardiology guard (2006-2011) and a second period (2012-2016) with both measures working.
Results
1524 patients were included, 47.2% after the start of cardiology shift. We observed an increase in primary angioplasty (34.3% to 75.7%, P < .001) as well as a reduction in door-to-balloon time of 64 minutes (220 [IQR, 167-290] to 156 [IQR, 130-197], P < .001). This translates into a shorter hospital stay as well as a reduction in complications during hospitalization, mainly recurrent ischemia. Although there is a trend towards lower hospital mortality, mortality during follow-up did not change with the cardiology guard.
Conclusions
The presence of a cardiologist on call increases the number of patients reperfused, and shortens the time until it. This translates into a shorter hospital stay, as well as lower short-term mortality. Our results indicate that the creation of the cardiological guard brings additional benefit to the care network for patients with STEMI.