{"title":"What Relationships Do We Want with Technology? Toward Technoskepticism in Schools","authors":"Jacob Pleasants, Daniel G. Krutka, T. P. Nichols","doi":"10.17763/1943-5045-93.4.486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, Jacob Pleasants, Dani el G. Krutka, and T. Philip Nichols outline a vision for how technology education can and ought to occur through the core subject areas of science, social studies, and English language arts. In their argument for the development of a technoskeptical stance for thinking critically and making informed decisions about technology, they discuss past and current efforts to address both the teaching and use of technology within the subject areas and possibilities for a deeper and more coherent technology education. To support that goal, they present the Technoskepticism Iceberg as a conceptual framework to identify the technical, psycho social, and political dimensions of technology and highlight ways of thinking with greater depth about those dimensions.","PeriodicalId":48207,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Educational Review","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Educational Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-93.4.486","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this essay, Jacob Pleasants, Dani el G. Krutka, and T. Philip Nichols outline a vision for how technology education can and ought to occur through the core subject areas of science, social studies, and English language arts. In their argument for the development of a technoskeptical stance for thinking critically and making informed decisions about technology, they discuss past and current efforts to address both the teaching and use of technology within the subject areas and possibilities for a deeper and more coherent technology education. To support that goal, they present the Technoskepticism Iceberg as a conceptual framework to identify the technical, psycho social, and political dimensions of technology and highlight ways of thinking with greater depth about those dimensions.
在这篇文章中,雅各布-普莱森茨(Jacob Pleasants)、丹尼-克鲁特卡(Dani el G. Krutka)和T-菲利普-尼科尔斯(T. Philip Nichols)概述了如何通过科学、社会研究和英语语言艺术等核心学科领域开展技术教育的愿景。他们主张发展技术怀疑论的立场,以便对技术进行批判性思考并做出明智的决定。他们讨论了过去和当前在学科领域内解决技术教学和使用问题的努力,以及更深入、更连贯的技术教育的可能性。为了支持这一目标,他们提出了技术怀疑论冰山(Technoskepticism Iceberg)这一概念框架,以确定技术的技术、社会心理和政治层面,并强调对这些层面进行更深入思考的方法。
期刊介绍:
The Harvard Educational Review (HER) accepts contributions from researchers, scholars, policy makers, practitioners, teachers, students, and informed observers in education and related fields. In addition to original reports of research and theory, HER welcomes articles that reflect on teaching and practice in educational settings in the United States and abroad.