Household solid waste management in a recently established municipality of Bangladesh: Prevailing practices, residents’ perceptions, attitude and awareness

Anirban Sarker , Tarit Kumar Baul , Tapan Kumar Nath , Shyamal Karmakar , Alak Paul
{"title":"Household solid waste management in a recently established municipality of Bangladesh: Prevailing practices, residents’ perceptions, attitude and awareness","authors":"Anirban Sarker ,&nbsp;Tarit Kumar Baul ,&nbsp;Tapan Kumar Nath ,&nbsp;Shyamal Karmakar ,&nbsp;Alak Paul","doi":"10.1016/j.wds.2023.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Increasing population, economic activities, and the associated factors put a serious strain on municipal solid waste management in developing nations. We assessed the amount of solid waste generated and elucidated the existing management practices at household level in Mymensingh City Corporation, Bangladesh. We also investigated residents’ perceptions and attitudes on waste management and their awareness on waste-induced health and environmental problems. Data were gathered by a questionnaire survey of 352 households and two key informants’ interviews. The Kruskal-Wallis H and Pearson Chi-Squared tests were used for statistical analysis. Results show that a household generated about 0.62 kg of waste per day of which 99% was organic. Following the door-to-door approach, the city corporation collects unsegregated waste. More than 50% of the households reused fresh food waste as green fertilizer, and either reused or sold paper, metal, and plastic waste. Small, higher-income, and educated households generated higher amounts of organic waste than their counterparts. Respondents were satisfied with the existing door-to-door waste collection system, like to use of bioenergy and organic fertilizer, and were willing to pay for sustainable and eco-friendly waste management. More than 80% of respondents were aware of public health and environmental issues caused by waste mismanagement. The corporation has a plan to establish an energy and compost plant for which we suggest providing incentives for source segregation and designated bins to households. The city planners can take the findings of this study as useful baseline information for planning sustainable municipal solid waste management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101285,"journal":{"name":"World Development Sustainability","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X23000757/pdfft?md5=4b131799994a2c037e845889189a7a0d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772655X23000757-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X23000757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing population, economic activities, and the associated factors put a serious strain on municipal solid waste management in developing nations. We assessed the amount of solid waste generated and elucidated the existing management practices at household level in Mymensingh City Corporation, Bangladesh. We also investigated residents’ perceptions and attitudes on waste management and their awareness on waste-induced health and environmental problems. Data were gathered by a questionnaire survey of 352 households and two key informants’ interviews. The Kruskal-Wallis H and Pearson Chi-Squared tests were used for statistical analysis. Results show that a household generated about 0.62 kg of waste per day of which 99% was organic. Following the door-to-door approach, the city corporation collects unsegregated waste. More than 50% of the households reused fresh food waste as green fertilizer, and either reused or sold paper, metal, and plastic waste. Small, higher-income, and educated households generated higher amounts of organic waste than their counterparts. Respondents were satisfied with the existing door-to-door waste collection system, like to use of bioenergy and organic fertilizer, and were willing to pay for sustainable and eco-friendly waste management. More than 80% of respondents were aware of public health and environmental issues caused by waste mismanagement. The corporation has a plan to establish an energy and compost plant for which we suggest providing incentives for source segregation and designated bins to households. The city planners can take the findings of this study as useful baseline information for planning sustainable municipal solid waste management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉国一个新建市镇的家庭固体废物管理:现行做法、居民的看法、态度和意识
人口、经济活动和相关因素的增加给发展中国家的城市固体废物管理带来了严重压力。我们评估了孟加拉国迈门辛市政府产生的固体废物量,并阐明了家庭层面的现有管理做法。我们还调查了居民对废物管理的看法和态度,以及他们对废物引发的健康和环境问题的认识。数据是通过对 352 个家庭进行问卷调查和两次关键信息提供者访谈收集的。统计分析采用了 Kruskal-Wallis H 和 Pearson Chi-Squared 检验。结果显示,一个家庭每天产生约 0.62 公斤垃圾,其中 99% 为有机垃圾。城市公司采用挨家挨户的方式收集未分类的垃圾。超过 50% 的家庭将新鲜食物垃圾作为绿色肥料进行再利用,并对纸张、金属和塑料垃圾进行再利用或出售。小家庭、高收入家庭和受过教育的家庭产生的有机废物量高于同类家庭。受访者对现有的上门垃圾收集系统表示满意,喜欢使用生物能源和有机肥料,并愿意为可持续和环保的垃圾管理付费。超过 80% 的受访者意识到废物管理不善造成的公共卫生和环境问题。该公司已计划建立一个能源和堆肥厂,我们建议为其提供源头分类激励措施,并为家庭提供指定的垃圾箱。城市规划者可将本研究结果作为规划可持续城市固体废物管理的有用基准信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does the relative size of agricultural exports matter for sustainable development? Evidence from Sub-Sahara Africa On income inequality and CO2 emissions in Bangladesh Impact of public climate change adaptation policies on women's employment and poverty in Burkina Faso Why the impasse? The large dams debate and divergent perspectives Farmers’ preferences toward organic certification scheme: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Northern Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1