About the lack of direct horizontal effect of Directives in European Union Law

Nuno Cunha Rodrigues
{"title":"About the lack of direct horizontal effect of Directives in European Union Law","authors":"Nuno Cunha Rodrigues","doi":"10.51799/2763-8685v3n2011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to shed light on the distinction between Regulations and Directives as normative acts of European Union Law (derived). Based on these concepts, the principle of direct effect of European Union Law and the notion of direct applicability are clarified. These concepts do not have the same dimension in all European Union acts. The CJEU's case law recognizes the direct applicability of the Regulations (i.e. a direct vertical and horizontal effect). In the case of Directives, that jurisprudence only supports the possibility of vertical direct effect in relations between individuals and the State or public authorities in accordance with which individuals can invoke norms of a directive that are sufficiently clear, precise and unconditional in the context of relations legal-public. The CJEU does not recognize the possibility of a direct horizontal effect of Directives, which would be exercised in relationships between individuals (private legal relationships).","PeriodicalId":171261,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of European Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51799/2763-8685v3n2011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article aims to shed light on the distinction between Regulations and Directives as normative acts of European Union Law (derived). Based on these concepts, the principle of direct effect of European Union Law and the notion of direct applicability are clarified. These concepts do not have the same dimension in all European Union acts. The CJEU's case law recognizes the direct applicability of the Regulations (i.e. a direct vertical and horizontal effect). In the case of Directives, that jurisprudence only supports the possibility of vertical direct effect in relations between individuals and the State or public authorities in accordance with which individuals can invoke norms of a directive that are sufficiently clear, precise and unconditional in the context of relations legal-public. The CJEU does not recognize the possibility of a direct horizontal effect of Directives, which would be exercised in relationships between individuals (private legal relationships).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于欧盟法律中指令缺乏直接横向效力的问题
本文旨在阐明作为欧盟法规范性法案(派生)的《条例》和《指令》之间的区别。在这些概念的基础上,阐明了欧盟法律的直接效力原则和直接适用性概念。这些概念在所有欧盟法案中的含义并不相同。欧盟法院的判例法承认条例的直接适用性(即直接的纵向和横向效力)。就指令而言,该判例仅支持在个人与国家或公共当局之间的关系中产生纵向直接效力的可能性,根据这种可能性,个人可以在法律与公共关系中援引足够清晰、准确和无条件的指令规范。欧盟法院不承认指令在个人之间的关系(私人法律关系)中具有横向直接效力的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Justiça e redes sociais: modelos comparados de regulamentação da liberdade de expressão dos Magistrados entre tutela dos direitos fundamentais e estado de direito Development of artificial intelligence in the AI-Mandamus project: elements of developed know-how The biometric habeas data in the digital and algorithmic era in the European Union Solidarity and the protection of migrants under European Union law Data protection in Mercosur: current situation, perspectives and project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1