Exploration for Helium in the Phanerozoic

Paul Lafleur
{"title":"Exploration for Helium in the Phanerozoic","authors":"Paul Lafleur","doi":"10.31582/rmag.mg.60.3.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Almost all the helium discovered worldwide has been found by chance in the drilling for hydrocarbons. Targets were usually anticlinal structures located by seismic surveys. The association of helium and natural gas in reservoirs is purely coincidental because the source rocks for each are different—natural gas is mainly produced from diagenesis of carbon rich shale whereas Helium- 4 is derived mainly from the decay of uranium/thorium in the crust. A new geochemical exploration system for helium in the Phanerozoic is considered highly desirable by industry. The current exploration system in the Phanerozoic uses a modified petroleum system concept that has been used successfully for decades to high-grade plays and de-risk oil and gas prospects. Like a petroleum system, the helium system is identified by its source rock, reservoir, trap, seal, and migration pathways. However, this approach is expensive taking years to complete and can be a limiting factor for countries/provinces/states to develop their resources. As a precursor to ground helium/hydrogen surveys for exploration in the Phanerozoic, hyperspectral (satellite) surveys assess huge areas for their helium potential as well as any associated hydrocarbons. These areas may be even devoid of any previous exploration for hydrocarbons. This is followed with geochemical soil gas surveys of the more prospective trends to locate drilling locations. Both methods ascertain whether helium anomalies, which represent helium reservoirs at depth, are associated with hydrocarbons or nitrogen. Helium reservoirs associated with nitrogen are higher in helium content but are deeper, close to the basement. Hyperspectral and geochemical soil gas surveys are also applicable for projects that begin with helium analysis of old wells followed by seismic and drilling. Typically, exploration companies lease vast areas surrounding the legacy well, but their initial focus is on seismic in the area around the legacy well to determine the size and configuration of the helium reservoir and trap penetrated by the well and this is followed by drilling. It is not known at this point whether this reservoir is the best prospect because the helium discovered is usually associated with hydrocarbon (HC), not with nitrogen with much higher helium concentration in the lower Phanerozoic. Rarely do legacy wells penetrate deep enough to this level. Any cost-effective exploration program for helium is best accomplished by hyperspectral and follow-up geochemical soil gas surveys.","PeriodicalId":101513,"journal":{"name":"Mountain Geologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mountain Geologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31582/rmag.mg.60.3.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Almost all the helium discovered worldwide has been found by chance in the drilling for hydrocarbons. Targets were usually anticlinal structures located by seismic surveys. The association of helium and natural gas in reservoirs is purely coincidental because the source rocks for each are different—natural gas is mainly produced from diagenesis of carbon rich shale whereas Helium- 4 is derived mainly from the decay of uranium/thorium in the crust. A new geochemical exploration system for helium in the Phanerozoic is considered highly desirable by industry. The current exploration system in the Phanerozoic uses a modified petroleum system concept that has been used successfully for decades to high-grade plays and de-risk oil and gas prospects. Like a petroleum system, the helium system is identified by its source rock, reservoir, trap, seal, and migration pathways. However, this approach is expensive taking years to complete and can be a limiting factor for countries/provinces/states to develop their resources. As a precursor to ground helium/hydrogen surveys for exploration in the Phanerozoic, hyperspectral (satellite) surveys assess huge areas for their helium potential as well as any associated hydrocarbons. These areas may be even devoid of any previous exploration for hydrocarbons. This is followed with geochemical soil gas surveys of the more prospective trends to locate drilling locations. Both methods ascertain whether helium anomalies, which represent helium reservoirs at depth, are associated with hydrocarbons or nitrogen. Helium reservoirs associated with nitrogen are higher in helium content but are deeper, close to the basement. Hyperspectral and geochemical soil gas surveys are also applicable for projects that begin with helium analysis of old wells followed by seismic and drilling. Typically, exploration companies lease vast areas surrounding the legacy well, but their initial focus is on seismic in the area around the legacy well to determine the size and configuration of the helium reservoir and trap penetrated by the well and this is followed by drilling. It is not known at this point whether this reservoir is the best prospect because the helium discovered is usually associated with hydrocarbon (HC), not with nitrogen with much higher helium concentration in the lower Phanerozoic. Rarely do legacy wells penetrate deep enough to this level. Any cost-effective exploration program for helium is best accomplished by hyperspectral and follow-up geochemical soil gas surveys.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生代氦勘探
全世界发现的氦几乎都是在钻探碳氢化合物时偶然发现的。目标通常是通过地震勘测找到的反斜面结构。氦气和天然气在储层中的结合纯属偶然,因为两者的来源岩石不同--天然气主要产生于富含碳的页岩的成岩作用,而氦-4 主要来自地壳中铀/钍的衰变。工业界认为,在新生代建立一个新的氦地球化学勘探系统是非常必要的。目前的新生代勘探系统采用的是经过修改的石油系统概念,几十年来,这一概念已成功用于高品位勘探和降低油气勘探风险。与石油系统一样,氦系统也是通过其源岩、储层、捕集器、密封和迁移路径来识别的。然而,这种方法耗资巨大,需要数年时间才能完成,可能成为限制国家/省/州开发资源的因素。作为在新生代进行地面氦/氢勘探的前奏,高光谱(卫星)勘探可评估大片区域的氦潜力以及任何相关的碳氢化合物。这些区域以前甚至可能没有任何碳氢化合物勘探。随后对更有前景的趋势进行地球化学土壤气体勘测,以确定钻探位置。这两种方法都能确定代表深层氦储层的氦异常是与碳氢化合物有关还是与氮有关。与氮有关的氦储层氦含量更高,但更深,更接近基底。高光谱和地球化学土壤气体勘测也适用于首先对老井进行氦气分析,然后进行地震勘测和钻探的项目。通常情况下,勘探公司会租赁旧井周围的大片区域,但最初的重点是在旧井周围区域进行地震勘探,以确定氦储层的规模和构造以及旧井穿透的陷阱,然后再进行钻探。目前尚不清楚该储层是否是最佳勘探区,因为所发现的氦通常与碳氢化合物(HC)有关,而不是与氮有关,因为下新生代的氦浓度要高得多。传统油井很少能深入到这一层次。任何具有成本效益的氦勘探计划最好通过高光谱和后续地球化学土壤气体勘测来完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Oil and Gas Play Turns Into a Prime Helium Prospect Recent Developments in Helium Exploitation in southern Saskatchewan and adjacent areas of Montana and Alberta Helium - Relationships to other reservoir gases and some implications for exploration: The New Mexico Example Fly Me to the Moon Exploration for Helium in the Phanerozoic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1