The Three Parts of Philosophy: A Textual Note on Apul. Pl. 1.3

IF 0.4 3区历史学 0 CLASSICS MNEMOSYNE Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI:10.1163/1568525x-bja10255

Lorenzo Salerno

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Pl. 1.3, Apuleius provides an account of the genesis of the tripartition of philosophy, recalling its incorrect (but by then traditional) attribution to Plato. In doing so, Apuleius states that Plato showed that the three parts of philosophy do not fight each other, but on the contrary support each other with mutual aid. While the meaning of the passage is clear, the text has been long debated. The aim of this paper is to show that none of the texts printed so far is satisfactory, and to propose a new solution.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

哲学的三个部分：关于阿普尔的文字说明Pl.1.3

在 Pl.在 Pl.1.3，阿普列乌斯讲述了哲学三段论的起源，回顾了柏拉图对哲学三段论的错误（但当时是传统）归因。在此过程中，阿普列乌斯指出，柏拉图表明哲学的三个部分并不相互争斗，相反，它们相互支持、相互帮助。虽然这段话的意思很明确，但对这段文字的争论却由来已久。本文旨在说明迄今为止所刊印的文本都不能令人满意，并提出一个新的解决方案。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

MNEMOSYNE CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since its first appearance as a journal of textual criticism in 1852, Mnemosyne has secured a position as one of the leading journals in its field worldwide. Its reputation is built on the Dutch academic tradition, famous for its rigour and thoroughness. It attracts contributions from all over the world, with the result that Mnemosyne is distinctive for a combination of scholarly approaches from both sides of the Atlantic and the Equator. Its presence in libraries around the globe is a sign of its continued reputation as an invaluable resource for scholarship in Classical studies.

期刊最新文献

Aristotle’s On the Good and the “Categorial Reduction Argument” Tanks for Nothing: an Explanation of Plautus Casina 121-125 Make Art, Not War: An Other (Hi)Story of thymos “Is the Embryo a Living Being?” (Aët. 5.15): Embryology, Plants, and the Origin of Life in Presocratic Thought A Translation Note on Pseudo-Seneca, Her. O. 1907