Perspectives of Students at Institutions of Higher Education Toward Open Distance Learning

{"title":"Perspectives of Students at Institutions of Higher Education Toward Open Distance Learning","authors":"","doi":"10.55057/ijares.2023.5.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open and Distance Learning (ODL) is a way of learning remotely without being in regular face-to-face contact with an instructor in the classroom. Students learn the content using instructional materials that are uploaded on online platforms. Despite the convenience of the learning method, there is a need to assess students' awareness and intention to use these platforms. This paper evaluates whether perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU), and perceived self-efficacy (PSE) can influence students enrolled at an institution of higher education (IHE) to choose open distance learning (ODL). The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has been identified to support the research framework of this study. A research framework was proposed and three hypotheses were developed. Data were obtained from 125 respondents enrolled in the ODL Program using convenient sampling. Data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical program on descriptive statistics, factor analysis, and regression. The results revealed that PU and PSE have direct relationships with the behavioral intention to choose ODL. Therefore, PU and PSE influenced the students to choose ODL. Meanwhile, PEU has no direct relationship with behavioral intention to choose ODL. Therefore, PEU cannot attract the interest and attention to influence the students to use ODL. The study helped uncover a significant understanding of students’ acceptance of ODL for IHEs to develop further ODL programs related to Islamic Finance and Banking courses under Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC). Also, ODL provides opportunities for interactions and communications between students and lecturers through information and communication technology (ICT) and multimedia. This study provides further empirical support that behavioral intention is able to be influenced to choose ODL.","PeriodicalId":426882,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society","volume":"71 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2023.5.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Open and Distance Learning (ODL) is a way of learning remotely without being in regular face-to-face contact with an instructor in the classroom. Students learn the content using instructional materials that are uploaded on online platforms. Despite the convenience of the learning method, there is a need to assess students' awareness and intention to use these platforms. This paper evaluates whether perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU), and perceived self-efficacy (PSE) can influence students enrolled at an institution of higher education (IHE) to choose open distance learning (ODL). The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has been identified to support the research framework of this study. A research framework was proposed and three hypotheses were developed. Data were obtained from 125 respondents enrolled in the ODL Program using convenient sampling. Data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical program on descriptive statistics, factor analysis, and regression. The results revealed that PU and PSE have direct relationships with the behavioral intention to choose ODL. Therefore, PU and PSE influenced the students to choose ODL. Meanwhile, PEU has no direct relationship with behavioral intention to choose ODL. Therefore, PEU cannot attract the interest and attention to influence the students to use ODL. The study helped uncover a significant understanding of students’ acceptance of ODL for IHEs to develop further ODL programs related to Islamic Finance and Banking courses under Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC). Also, ODL provides opportunities for interactions and communications between students and lecturers through information and communication technology (ICT) and multimedia. This study provides further empirical support that behavioral intention is able to be influenced to choose ODL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等院校学生对开放式远程学习的看法
开放式远程学习(ODL)是一种无需在课堂上与教师进行面对面交流的远程学习方式。学生使用上传到在线平台上的教学材料学习内容。尽管这种学习方式很方便,但仍有必要对学生使用这些平台的意识和意向进行评估。本文评估了感知有用性(PU)、感知易用性(PEU)和感知自我效能感(PSE)是否会影响高等教育机构(IHE)的学生选择远程开放学习(ODL)。技术接受模型(TAM)已被确定用于支持本研究的研究框架。本研究提出了一个研究框架和三个假设。本研究采用方便抽样法从 125 名参加开放式远程学习项目的受访者中获取数据。使用 SPSS 统计程序对数据进行了描述性统计、因素分析和回归分析。结果显示,PU 和 PSE 与选择 ODL 的行为意向有直接关系。因此,PU 和 PSE 会影响学生选择 ODL。同时,PEU 与选择 ODL 的行为意向没有直接关系。因此,PEU 无法吸引学生的兴趣和注意力,从而影响他们使用 ODL。这项研究有助于深入了解学生对开放式远程学习的接受程度,从而帮助国际高等教育机构进一步开发与大规模在线开放课程(MOOC)下的伊斯兰金融和银行课程相关的开放式远程学习项目。此外,开放式远程学习还通过信息与通信技术(ICT)和多媒体为学生与讲师之间的互动和交流提供了机会。本研究提供了进一步的实证支持,证明行为意向能够影响学生选择开放式在线学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Underachiever Studies of Gifted and Talented Students: Types and Implications Study On Application of Open Online Psychological Courses to Mental Health Education of College Students Kajian Jati Diri Holistik Pelajar Pintar dan Berbakat di Malaysia Measuring Student Adoption of Digital Platforms for Distance Education among University Students in Malaysia Penerapan Konsep Malaysia MADANI dalam Dasar Awam: Membudayakan Harmoni dalam Kepelbagaian
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1