The Final Chapter of Aristotle’s Poetics

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS MNEMOSYNE Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI:10.1163/1568525x-bja10237
Stavros Tsitsiridis
{"title":"The Final Chapter of Aristotle’s Poetics","authors":"Stavros Tsitsiridis","doi":"10.1163/1568525x-bja10237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the following close examination of chapter 26 of Aristotle’s <em>Poetics</em> it is argued (<em>a</em>) that unlike the main part of the treatise, tragedy and epic are no longer compared in the frame of ‘poetic art’, i.e. as literary genres, but rather as <em>Gesamtkunstwerke</em> judged by elitist criteria; (<em>b</em>) that the chapter adopts a logical method of argumentation founded on the dialectical method of the <em>Topics</em>; (<em>c</em>) that, as at the end of Book 8 of the <em>Politics</em>, it mainly reflects disputes in the Academy instigated by the so-called ‘New Music’; (<em>d</em>) that for a variety of reasons this chapter of the <em>Poetics</em> and hence the earlier layer of the treatise dates back to Aristotle’s first Athenian period (367-347 <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">BCE</span>).</p>","PeriodicalId":46134,"journal":{"name":"MNEMOSYNE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MNEMOSYNE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-bja10237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the following close examination of chapter 26 of Aristotle’s Poetics it is argued (a) that unlike the main part of the treatise, tragedy and epic are no longer compared in the frame of ‘poetic art’, i.e. as literary genres, but rather as Gesamtkunstwerke judged by elitist criteria; (b) that the chapter adopts a logical method of argumentation founded on the dialectical method of the Topics; (c) that, as at the end of Book 8 of the Politics, it mainly reflects disputes in the Academy instigated by the so-called ‘New Music’; (d) that for a variety of reasons this chapter of the Poetics and hence the earlier layer of the treatise dates back to Aristotle’s first Athenian period (367-347 BCE).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚里士多德《诗学》的最后一章
在下面对亚里士多德《诗学》第 26 章的仔细研究中,我们认为 (a) 与论文的主要部分不同,悲剧和史诗不再在 "诗歌艺术 "的框架内进行比较,即不再作为文学体裁进行比较,而是作为以精英主义标准进行评判的 Gesamtkunstwerke 进行比较(b) 本章采用的逻辑论证方法建立在 "论题 "的辩证法基础之上;(c) 如同《政治学》第 8 卷末尾一样,本章主要反映了所谓 "新音乐 "在学院中引发的争论;(d) 由于种种原因,《诗学》本章以及该论文的前几部分可追溯到亚里士多德的第一个雅典时期(公元前 367-347 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MNEMOSYNE
MNEMOSYNE CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Since its first appearance as a journal of textual criticism in 1852, Mnemosyne has secured a position as one of the leading journals in its field worldwide. Its reputation is built on the Dutch academic tradition, famous for its rigour and thoroughness. It attracts contributions from all over the world, with the result that Mnemosyne is distinctive for a combination of scholarly approaches from both sides of the Atlantic and the Equator. Its presence in libraries around the globe is a sign of its continued reputation as an invaluable resource for scholarship in Classical studies.
期刊最新文献
Aristotle’s On the Good and the “Categorial Reduction Argument” Tanks for Nothing: an Explanation of Plautus Casina 121-125 Make Art, Not War: An Other (Hi)Story of thymos “Is the Embryo a Living Being?” (Aët. 5.15): Embryology, Plants, and the Origin of Life in Presocratic Thought A Translation Note on Pseudo-Seneca, Her. O. 1907
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1