{"title":"Theoretical implications of the prefixation of Polish change of state verbs","authors":"Anna Malicka-Kleparska","doi":"10.1515/opli-2022-0250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text is devoted to a rarely described and analysed problem of a gap in the distribution of aspectual prefixes in Polish. Lexical prefixes do not appear as parts of word-internal morphology of synthetic change of state (COS) verbs suffixed with verbalizing morphemes -<jats:italic>e</jats:italic>-/-<jats:italic>ej</jats:italic>-, -<jats:italic>ną</jats:italic>-, and -<jats:italic>owa</jats:italic>-. The analysis presented below treats such COS verbs as homonymous pairs of lexical items. The telic homonym is equipped with the result phrase (RP) headed by the zero morpheme, whose appearance blocks the insertion of any other telicizing morpheme in the form of a lexical prefix. The zero morpheme is selected by the verbalizers peculiar to COS verbs of synthetic type. The atelic homonym does not have the RP in its structure and, in consequence, does not include a structural position for telicizing heads in the form of lexical prefixes to be ever inserted. The model strongly supports the distinction between the concepts of telicity and perfectivity in Polish, and by extrapolation – in other Slavic languages.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The text is devoted to a rarely described and analysed problem of a gap in the distribution of aspectual prefixes in Polish. Lexical prefixes do not appear as parts of word-internal morphology of synthetic change of state (COS) verbs suffixed with verbalizing morphemes -e-/-ej-, -ną-, and -owa-. The analysis presented below treats such COS verbs as homonymous pairs of lexical items. The telic homonym is equipped with the result phrase (RP) headed by the zero morpheme, whose appearance blocks the insertion of any other telicizing morpheme in the form of a lexical prefix. The zero morpheme is selected by the verbalizers peculiar to COS verbs of synthetic type. The atelic homonym does not have the RP in its structure and, in consequence, does not include a structural position for telicizing heads in the form of lexical prefixes to be ever inserted. The model strongly supports the distinction between the concepts of telicity and perfectivity in Polish, and by extrapolation – in other Slavic languages.
该文专门讨论了一个很少被描述和分析的问题,即波兰语中方面前缀分布的空白。词性前缀不作为词内形态的一部分出现在以动词化语素-e-/-ej-、-ną-和-owa-为后缀的合成状态变化(COS)动词中。下面的分析将这类 COS 动词视为同义的词项对。同形同义词配有以零词素为首的结果短语(RP),零词素的出现阻止了以词素前缀形式插入任何其他同形词素。零词素是由 COS 合成动词特有的动词化词素选择的。非谓语同义词的结构中没有 RP,因此,它的结构位置中也不包括以词性前缀形式插入的伸缩词头。该模型有力地支持了波兰语中伸缩性和完形性概念之间的区别,推而广之,也支持了其他斯拉夫语言中伸缩性和完形性概念之间的区别。