Study of the History of the Synods of 1666 and 1666–1667

IF 0.4 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI:10.1134/s1019331623070031
E. V. Belyakova
{"title":"Study of the History of the Synods of 1666 and 1666–1667","authors":"E. V. Belyakova","doi":"10.1134/s1019331623070031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>In the 16th–17th centuries, the Russian Church was undergoing the same process of confessionalization as the churches in other European countries. A special role in it was played by the patriarchate of Filaret, when the Synod of 1620 recognized immersion baptism as the only correct way to baptize and formulated the features that distinguish Moscow Orthodoxy from both Catholics and other churches. Under Filaret, the state and church systems of government merged, and “Procheiron laws” began to be applied against violators of church rules. Reforms of Tsar Alexis Mikhailovich opened a new stage of confessionalization, changing the already approved symbols, which was perceived as the introduction of a “new faith.” Handwritten materials from the Synods of 1666 and 1666–1667 are considered, and an attempt is made to answer the question why they have never been published in full. It is shown that only those Acts that were included in the <i>Service Book</i> of 1667 became known to contemporaries. The changes in relation to the previous period of confessionalization were radical.</p>","PeriodicalId":56335,"journal":{"name":"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331623070031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 16th–17th centuries, the Russian Church was undergoing the same process of confessionalization as the churches in other European countries. A special role in it was played by the patriarchate of Filaret, when the Synod of 1620 recognized immersion baptism as the only correct way to baptize and formulated the features that distinguish Moscow Orthodoxy from both Catholics and other churches. Under Filaret, the state and church systems of government merged, and “Procheiron laws” began to be applied against violators of church rules. Reforms of Tsar Alexis Mikhailovich opened a new stage of confessionalization, changing the already approved symbols, which was perceived as the introduction of a “new faith.” Handwritten materials from the Synods of 1666 and 1666–1667 are considered, and an attempt is made to answer the question why they have never been published in full. It is shown that only those Acts that were included in the Service Book of 1667 became known to contemporaries. The changes in relation to the previous period of confessionalization were radical.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1666 年和 1666-1667 年宗教会议历史研究
摘要 16-17 世纪,俄罗斯教会经历了与其他欧洲国家教会相同的教派化进程。1620 年的宗教会议承认浸入式洗礼是唯一正确的洗礼方式,并制定了莫斯科东正教区别于天主教和其他教会的特征。在菲拉雷特统治下,国家和教会的政府系统合并,并开始对违反教会规则的人实施 "普罗切隆法"。沙皇亚历克西斯-米哈伊洛维奇的改革开启了教派化的新阶段,改变了已获批准的标志,这被视为引入了 "新信仰"。本文研究了 1666 年和 1666-1667 年宗教会议的手写材料,并试图回答为何这些材料从未全文出版的问题。研究表明,只有那些被收录在 1667 年《礼拜录》中的法案才为同时代的人所知。与之前的教派化时期相比,变化是翻天覆地的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
141
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences provides a broad coverage of the Russian Academy of Sciences’ activities. It publishes original works, surveys, speeches, and discussions with participation of the members of Russian Academy of Sciences, leading scientists in Russia and worldwide and presents various viewpoints on important subjects related to all fields of science. The journal addresses the questions of scientist’s role in society and the role of scientific knowledge in the modern world.
期刊最新文献
The “Nuclear Winter” Hypothesis and a Responsible Nuclear Policy Medical Services of Russia, France, and Britain in the Crimean War, 1853–1856 The Topical Past: Instrumentalization of the Historical Memory of 1812 during the Crimean War of 1853–1856 B.N. Chicherin: The Crimean War as a Reflection of the Crisis of the Russian Empire The Crimean War and the Kingdom of Sardinia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1