Government spending efficiency in Latin America

IF 1.9 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Empirica Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI:10.1007/s10663-023-09599-4
António Afonso, Gabriela Baquero Fraga
{"title":"Government spending efficiency in Latin America","authors":"António Afonso, Gabriela Baquero Fraga","doi":"10.1007/s10663-023-09599-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We assess public spending efficiency of 20 Latin American countries over the period of 2000–2019, computing data envelopment analysis efficiency scores. For the Public Sector Performance composite indicator, we use the annual data of socio-economic indicators, and for the input measure we consider Total Public Spending as a percentage of GDP, by spending category. The results show that public spending during the period under study increased, but that overall governments were not efficient, as on average they could have used 27% less spending to achieve the same levels of performance. On the other hand, governments could have increased their performance by 18% whilst maintaining the same level of spending. The most-efficient countries were Chile, Guatemala, Panama, and Paraguay, with the least efficient being Bolivia, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Suriname, and Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":46526,"journal":{"name":"Empirica","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-023-09599-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We assess public spending efficiency of 20 Latin American countries over the period of 2000–2019, computing data envelopment analysis efficiency scores. For the Public Sector Performance composite indicator, we use the annual data of socio-economic indicators, and for the input measure we consider Total Public Spending as a percentage of GDP, by spending category. The results show that public spending during the period under study increased, but that overall governments were not efficient, as on average they could have used 27% less spending to achieve the same levels of performance. On the other hand, governments could have increased their performance by 18% whilst maintaining the same level of spending. The most-efficient countries were Chile, Guatemala, Panama, and Paraguay, with the least efficient being Bolivia, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Suriname, and Brazil.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉丁美洲的政府支出效率
我们对 2000-2019 年间 20 个拉美国家的公共支出效率进行了评估,并计算了数据包络分析效率得分。在公共部门绩效综合指标方面,我们使用了社会经济指标的年度数据;在投入指标方面,我们考虑了公共支出总额占国内生产总值的百分比(按支出类别划分)。结果表明,在研究期间,公共开支有所增加,但总体而言,政府的效率并不高,因为平均而言,政府本可以减少 27% 的开支来实现相同的绩效水平。另一方面,在保持相同支出水平的情况下,政府本可以将绩效提高 18%。效率最高的国家是智利、危地马拉、巴拿马和巴拉圭,效率最低的国家是玻利维亚、委内瑞拉、尼加拉瓜、苏里南和巴西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Empirica
Empirica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Empirica is a peer-reviewed journal, which publishes original research of general interest to an international audience. Authors are invited to submit empirical papers in all areas of economics with a particular focus on European economies. Per January 2021, the editors also solicit descriptive papers on current or unexplored topics. Founded in 1974, Empirica is the official journal of the Nationalökonomische Gesellschaft (Austrian Economic Association) and is published in cooperation with Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO). The journal aims at a wide international audience and invites submissions from economists around the world. Officially cited as: Empirica
期刊最新文献
Testing PPP hypothesis under considerations of nonlinear and asymmetric adjustments: new international evidence The varying impact of COVID-19 in the Spanish Labor Market Intergroup cooperation in the lab: asymmetric power relations and redistributive policies Labor market outcomes during opposite resource shocks: the 2009 and 2012 earthquakes in Italy Optimal fiscal policy in times of uncertainty: a stochastic control approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1