Optimizing ambulatory reflux monitoring: current findings and future directions.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-25 DOI:10.1080/17474124.2023.2297919
Dhweeja Dasarathy, Michael Vaezi, Dhyanesh Patel
{"title":"Optimizing ambulatory reflux monitoring: current findings and future directions.","authors":"Dhweeja Dasarathy, Michael Vaezi, Dhyanesh Patel","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2023.2297919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common diagnosis seen in outpatient gastroenterology clinics. The diagnosis is made by a variable combination of symptoms, response to acid suppressive therapy, endoscopic evaluation, and pH testing. In this review, we evaluate how to utilize various reflux testing in clinical practice based on current evidence.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Ambulatory reflux monitoring is a recognized diagnostic tool for clinical decision making in patients with/without established GERD, persistent reflux symptoms, and lack of response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Standard evaluation approaches include 24-hour pH or impedance monitoring via transnasal catheter, prolonged (48 to 96 hour) wireless pH monitoring, and the recently developed mucosal integrity testing. Testing using one of these methods allows for measurement of acid exposure, frequency of reflux, and to phenotype patients to personalize treatment recommendations.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The primary goal of future studies should be to simplify ambulatory reflux monitoring, reduce diagnostic latency, improve patient tolerance, and to obtain clinical outcomes-based studies. The current paradigm of reflux testing is vastly complex with multiple modalities and shifting cutoffs of pH abnormality that lead to high economic burden on the society.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"13-24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2023.2297919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common diagnosis seen in outpatient gastroenterology clinics. The diagnosis is made by a variable combination of symptoms, response to acid suppressive therapy, endoscopic evaluation, and pH testing. In this review, we evaluate how to utilize various reflux testing in clinical practice based on current evidence.

Areas covered: Ambulatory reflux monitoring is a recognized diagnostic tool for clinical decision making in patients with/without established GERD, persistent reflux symptoms, and lack of response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Standard evaluation approaches include 24-hour pH or impedance monitoring via transnasal catheter, prolonged (48 to 96 hour) wireless pH monitoring, and the recently developed mucosal integrity testing. Testing using one of these methods allows for measurement of acid exposure, frequency of reflux, and to phenotype patients to personalize treatment recommendations.

Expert opinion: The primary goal of future studies should be to simplify ambulatory reflux monitoring, reduce diagnostic latency, improve patient tolerance, and to obtain clinical outcomes-based studies. The current paradigm of reflux testing is vastly complex with multiple modalities and shifting cutoffs of pH abnormality that lead to high economic burden on the society.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化流动反流监测:当前发现与未来方向。
简介胃食管反流病(GERD)是消化内科门诊中最常见的诊断。诊断是根据症状、对抑酸治疗的反应、内窥镜评估和 pH 值测试的不同组合做出的。在本综述中,我们将根据目前的证据评估如何在临床实践中使用各种反流检测:非卧床反流监测是一种公认的诊断工具,用于对已确诊/未确诊胃食管反流病、持续反流症状以及对质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗无反应的患者进行临床决策。标准评估方法包括通过经鼻导管进行 24 小时 pH 值或阻抗监测、长时间(48 至 96 小时)无线 pH 值监测以及最近开发的粘膜完整性测试。使用这些方法中的一种进行测试,可以测量酸暴露、反流频率,并对患者进行表型分析,从而提出个性化的治疗建议:未来研究的主要目标应该是简化非卧床反流监测、减少诊断潜伏期、提高患者耐受性,并获得基于临床结果的研究。目前的反流检测模式非常复杂,有多种模式,pH 值异常的临界值不断变化,给社会造成了沉重的经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The enormous health and economic burden of gastrointestinal disease worldwide warrants a sharp focus on the etiology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, treatment and development of new therapies. By the end of the last century we had seen enormous advances, both in technologies to visualize disease and in curative therapies in areas such as gastric ulcer, with the advent first of the H2-antagonists and then the proton pump inhibitors - clear examples of how advances in medicine can massively benefit the patient. Nevertheless, specialists face ongoing challenges from a wide array of diseases of diverse etiology.
期刊最新文献
Cellular senescence and its pathogenic and therapeutic implications in autoimmune hepatitis. Implications of the microbiome after pancreatic cancer resection with regards to morbidity & mortality. Diagnosing and managing gastroparesis - where are we now? Interrupting inflammatory bowel disease therapy: why, who, when and how to consider medication holidays. Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: recent developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1