Introduction: Accurate and reliable diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic fibrosis is increasingly important given the variable natural history in chronic liver disease (CLD) and expanding antifibrotic therapeutic options targeting reversibility of early-stage cirrhosis. This highlights the need to develop more refined and effective noninvasive techniques for the dynamic assessment of fibrogenesis and fibrolysis.
Areas covered: We conducted a literature review on PubMed, from 1 December 1970, to 1 November 2024, to evaluate and compare available blood-based and imaging-based noninvasive tools for hepatic fibrosis diagnosis and monitoring. Simple scores such as FIB-4 and NAFLD fibrosis score are suitable for excluding significant or advanced fibrosis, while tertiary centers should adopt complex scores and liver stiffness measurement as part of a secondary diagnostic and more comprehensive evaluation. Moreover, the advent of multiomics for high-resolution molecular profiling, and integration of artificial intelligence for noninvasive diagnostics holds promise for revolutionizing fibrosis monitoring and treatment through novel biomarker discovery and predictive omics-based algorithms.
Expert opinion: The increased shift toward noninvasive diagnostics for liver fibrosis needs to align with personalized medicine, enabling more effective, tailored management strategies for patients with liver disease in the future.
{"title":"The role of noninvasive biomarkers for monitoring cell injury in advanced liver fibrosis.","authors":"Righetti Riccardo, Felice Cinque, Keyur Patel, Giada Sebastiani","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2450717","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2025.2450717","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate and reliable diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic fibrosis is increasingly important given the variable natural history in chronic liver disease (CLD) and expanding antifibrotic therapeutic options targeting reversibility of early-stage cirrhosis. This highlights the need to develop more refined and effective noninvasive techniques for the dynamic assessment of fibrogenesis and fibrolysis.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We conducted a literature review on PubMed, from 1 December 1970, to 1 November 2024, to evaluate and compare available blood-based and imaging-based noninvasive tools for hepatic fibrosis diagnosis and monitoring. Simple scores such as FIB-4 and NAFLD fibrosis score are suitable for excluding significant or advanced fibrosis, while tertiary centers should adopt complex scores and liver stiffness measurement as part of a secondary diagnostic and more comprehensive evaluation. Moreover, the advent of multiomics for high-resolution molecular profiling, and integration of artificial intelligence for noninvasive diagnostics holds promise for revolutionizing fibrosis monitoring and treatment through novel biomarker discovery and predictive omics-based algorithms.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The increased shift toward noninvasive diagnostics for liver fibrosis needs to align with personalized medicine, enabling more effective, tailored management strategies for patients with liver disease in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-08DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2450699
Antonio Z Gimeno-García, Davinia Sacramento-Luis, Rashika Ashok-Bhagchandani, David Nicolás-Pérez, Manuel Hernández-Guerra
Introduction: Suboptimal bowel preparation adversely affects colonoscopy quality, increases healthcare costs, and prolongs waiting time. The primary contributing factors include poor tolerance to the preparation solutions, noncompliance with prescribed instructions, and suboptimal efficacy of the bowel cleansing solution itself.
Areas covered: This review examined the predictive factors associated with suboptimal bowel preparation and discussed interventions aimed at improving bowel cleansing. It also provides evidence-based practical algorithms supplemented by insights from our own clinical experience. Relevant topics were reviewed using resources from the PubMed database.
Expert opinion: Although current bowel preparation protocols are effective for the majority of patients, a significant proportion still present challenges for optimal preparation. These patients may benefit from personalized strategies tailored to the specific causes of preparation failure. Conducting a thorough interview is crucial for identifying the reasons for failure, particularly in patients who have previously experienced suboptimal preparation during colonoscopy. In colonoscopy-naïve patients, it is essential to assess the risk of suboptimal preparation. In both cases, interventions should be customized to either address the identified causes in the former group or employ preventive strategies to reduce the likelihood of failure in the latter.
{"title":"Interventions to improve bowel cleansing in colonoscopy.","authors":"Antonio Z Gimeno-García, Davinia Sacramento-Luis, Rashika Ashok-Bhagchandani, David Nicolás-Pérez, Manuel Hernández-Guerra","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2450699","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2450699","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Suboptimal bowel preparation adversely affects colonoscopy quality, increases healthcare costs, and prolongs waiting time. The primary contributing factors include poor tolerance to the preparation solutions, noncompliance with prescribed instructions, and suboptimal efficacy of the bowel cleansing solution itself.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examined the predictive factors associated with suboptimal bowel preparation and discussed interventions aimed at improving bowel cleansing. It also provides evidence-based practical algorithms supplemented by insights from our own clinical experience. Relevant topics were reviewed using resources from the PubMed database.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Although current bowel preparation protocols are effective for the majority of patients, a significant proportion still present challenges for optimal preparation. These patients may benefit from personalized strategies tailored to the specific causes of preparation failure. Conducting a thorough interview is crucial for identifying the reasons for failure, particularly in patients who have previously experienced suboptimal preparation during colonoscopy. In colonoscopy-naïve patients, it is essential to assess the risk of suboptimal preparation. In both cases, interventions should be customized to either address the identified causes in the former group or employ preventive strategies to reduce the likelihood of failure in the latter.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142931062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-08DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2450795
F Lusetti, C Bezzio, A De Bernardi, M Dota, G Manes, S Saibeni
Introduction: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), present ongoing challenges despite advances in pathophysiological understanding and therapeutic options. Current therapies often fail to achieve sustained remission, necessitating exploration of novel treatment targets.
Areas covered: This review explores the role of Tumor Necrosis Factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A) and its receptor DR3 in IBD pathogenesis, detailing their involvement in mucosal homeostasis and immune modulation. Recent studies on TL1A inhibitors highlight their potential in mitigating inflammation and fibrosis in IBD.
Expert opinion: TL1A inhibition emerges as a promising therapeutic strategy, supported by encouraging outcomes in clinical trials for moderate to severe IBD. Future research may elucidate TL1A's broader impact on immunity, epithelial integrity and fibrosis, offering new avenues for therapeutic intervention and biomarker discovery. Ongoing phase 3 trials are pivotal in assessing TL1A inhibitors as effective and safe treatments for IBD. Additionally, exploration of TL1A's role in fibrosis-associated complications and its potential as a biomarker for treatment response holds promise for personalized medicine approaches. Consideration of TL1A inhibition in concurrent immune-mediated inflammatory diseases suggests broader therapeutic implications beyond gastrointestinal manifestations of IBD.
{"title":"The TL1A inhibitors in IBD: what's in the pot?","authors":"F Lusetti, C Bezzio, A De Bernardi, M Dota, G Manes, S Saibeni","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2450795","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2025.2450795","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), present ongoing challenges despite advances in pathophysiological understanding and therapeutic options. Current therapies often fail to achieve sustained remission, necessitating exploration of novel treatment targets.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review explores the role of Tumor Necrosis Factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A) and its receptor DR3 in IBD pathogenesis, detailing their involvement in mucosal homeostasis and immune modulation. Recent studies on TL1A inhibitors highlight their potential in mitigating inflammation and fibrosis in IBD.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>TL1A inhibition emerges as a promising therapeutic strategy, supported by encouraging outcomes in clinical trials for moderate to severe IBD. Future research may elucidate TL1A's broader impact on immunity, epithelial integrity and fibrosis, offering new avenues for therapeutic intervention and biomarker discovery. Ongoing phase 3 trials are pivotal in assessing TL1A inhibitors as effective and safe treatments for IBD. Additionally, exploration of TL1A's role in fibrosis-associated complications and its potential as a biomarker for treatment response holds promise for personalized medicine approaches. Consideration of TL1A inhibition in concurrent immune-mediated inflammatory diseases suggests broader therapeutic implications beyond gastrointestinal manifestations of IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2450707
Srishti Saha, Bernd Schnabl
Introduction: The gut microbiota has a complex relationship with the human host and is key to maintaining health. Disruption of the healthy diverse gut microbial milieu plays an important role in the pathogenesis of several diseases including Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, alcohol-related liver disease and metabolic-dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is highly effective in treating CDI, though its utility in other diseases is still being explored.
Areas covered: In this narrative review, we explore the role of gut microbiota in liver diseases, focusing on key changes in the microbial composition and function. We summarize current evidence on the role of FMT, identifying gaps in current research and outlining future directions for investigation. We comprehensively searched PubMed through 15 October 2024 to identify relevant studies.
Expert opinion: While data from available studies shows promise, more research is necessary before we can use FMT for liver diseases. Key areas that require further study are- determining the optimal FMT regimen for each disease, establishing efficacy and safety with larger clinical trials, ensuring safe and equitable access to the FMT product and mechanistic insights into the reasons for success or failure of FMT.
{"title":"<u>Modulating the microbiome in chronic liver diseases- current evidence on the role of fecal microbiota transplantation</u>.","authors":"Srishti Saha, Bernd Schnabl","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2450707","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2025.2450707","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The gut microbiota has a complex relationship with the human host and is key to maintaining health. Disruption of the healthy diverse gut microbial milieu plays an important role in the pathogenesis of several diseases including <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI), inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, alcohol-related liver disease and metabolic-dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is highly effective in treating CDI, though its utility in other diseases is still being explored.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this narrative review, we explore the role of gut microbiota in liver diseases, focusing on key changes in the microbial composition and function. We summarize current evidence on the role of FMT, identifying gaps in current research and outlining future directions for investigation. We comprehensively searched PubMed through 15 October 2024 to identify relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>While data from available studies shows promise, more research is necessary before we can use FMT for liver diseases. Key areas that require further study are- determining the optimal FMT regimen for each disease, establishing efficacy and safety with larger clinical trials, ensuring safe and equitable access to the FMT product and mechanistic insights into the reasons for success or failure of FMT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142931058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2450723
Muhammad Umair Tayyub, Deepak Joshi
{"title":"PSC patient with jaundice - should we ERCP?","authors":"Muhammad Umair Tayyub, Deepak Joshi","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2450723","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2025.2450723","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142931064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-05DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2449455
André J Smout, Marlies P Schijven, Albert J Bredenoord
Introduction: Surgical gastric fundoplication is an effective treatment option for gastroesophageal reflux disease. In contrast to acid suppression, fundoplication nearly abolishes all types of reflux, acid and nonacid. However, in some cases lasting side effects of the procedure may overshadow its positive effects. It has remained difficult to determine which patients are the most suitable candidates for fundoplication.
Areas covered: This review aims to evaluate the available data on preoperative factors that are associated with the outcome of fundoplication and to determine which combination of patient characteristics and preoperative test results provides optimal selection. In addition, we assess the need for tailoring the procedure on the basis of the preoperative quality of esophageal peristalsis.
Expert opinion: Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease is underutilized as it may provide an excellent option for a subset of GERD patients. It is not sensible to restrict surgical treatment to patients who do not respond to acid suppression. However, meticulous patient selection is key. Most importantly, surgical treatment should not be considered in patients in whom there is no convincing evidence that the symptoms are caused by reflux. Impaired esophageal peristalsis should not be regarded as a contraindication against fundoplication.
{"title":"Antireflux surgery - choosing the right candidate.","authors":"André J Smout, Marlies P Schijven, Albert J Bredenoord","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2024.2449455","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2024.2449455","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical gastric fundoplication is an effective treatment option for gastroesophageal reflux disease. In contrast to acid suppression, fundoplication nearly abolishes all types of reflux, acid and nonacid. However, in some cases lasting side effects of the procedure may overshadow its positive effects. It has remained difficult to determine which patients are the most suitable candidates for fundoplication.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review aims to evaluate the available data on preoperative factors that are associated with the outcome of fundoplication and to determine which combination of patient characteristics and preoperative test results provides optimal selection. In addition, we assess the need for tailoring the procedure on the basis of the preoperative quality of esophageal peristalsis.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease is underutilized as it may provide an excellent option for a subset of GERD patients. It is not sensible to restrict surgical treatment to patients who do not respond to acid suppression. However, meticulous patient selection is key. Most importantly, surgical treatment should not be considered in patients in whom there is no convincing evidence that the symptoms are caused by reflux. Impaired esophageal peristalsis should not be regarded as a contraindication against fundoplication.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142931060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-03DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2448451
Paulo Gustavo Kotze, Sailish Honap, Mariane Christina Savio, Rafaela Molteni Moretti Araújo, Abel Botelho Quaresma, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Introduction: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a critical manifestation of ulcerative colitis (UC), often necessitating colectomy when medical management fails. Despite advancements in therapeutic interventions such as corticosteroids, biologics, and JAK inhibitors, a significant proportion of patients require surgery, with colectomy rates ranging from 10% to 15%.
Areas covered: This paper reviews the factors influencing the timing and necessity of colectomy in ASUC management, emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary decision-making involving gastroenterologists and surgeons.
Expert opinion: Key surgical indications include failure of medical therapy, toxic megacolon, perforation, uncontrolled bleeding, and systemic deterioration. Delays in surgery can result in higher morbidity and mortality rates, making timely intervention essential. This review highlights surgical techniques, including total colectomy and end ileostomy, and discusses potential complications, urging a balanced approach to optimize patient outcomes.
{"title":"Acute severe ulcerative colitis: defining the precise moment for colectomy.","authors":"Paulo Gustavo Kotze, Sailish Honap, Mariane Christina Savio, Rafaela Molteni Moretti Araújo, Abel Botelho Quaresma, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2024.2448451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2024.2448451","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a critical manifestation of ulcerative colitis (UC), often necessitating colectomy when medical management fails. Despite advancements in therapeutic interventions such as corticosteroids, biologics, and JAK inhibitors, a significant proportion of patients require surgery, with colectomy rates ranging from 10% to 15%.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This paper reviews the factors influencing the timing and necessity of colectomy in ASUC management, emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary decision-making involving gastroenterologists and surgeons.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Key surgical indications include failure of medical therapy, toxic megacolon, perforation, uncontrolled bleeding, and systemic deterioration. Delays in surgery can result in higher morbidity and mortality rates, making timely intervention essential. This review highlights surgical techniques, including total colectomy and end ileostomy, and discusses potential complications, urging a balanced approach to optimize patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2025-01-09DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2443574
Aashray Gupta, Simon Erridge, Vivian Graf, Monica Kelada, Lara Bapir, Naveen Jesuraj, John Warner-Levy, Evonne Clarke, Katy McLachlan, Ross Coomber, James J Rucker, Michael W Platt, Mikael H Sodergren
Background: Treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain limited, and cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs) provide promise in addressing inflammation and pain. However, long-term data on CBMP efficacy in IBD are scarce. This study examines health-related quality of life (HRQoL) changes in IBD patients treated with CBMPs.
Research design and methods: Patients with IBD were identified from the UK Medical Cannabis Registry. Primary outcomes were changes in the short IBD questionnaire (SIBDQ), EQ-5D-5L, single-item sleep quality scale (SQS), and generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7), from baseline to 18-months after CBMP treatment started. Secondary outcomes were adverse event prevalence.
Results: Analysis of 116 patients with IBD included 94 males (81.03%) with a mean age of 39.52 ± 9.12 years. There were improvements in the SIBDQ, GAD-7, SQS, and EQ-5D-5L Index (p < 0.001). At 18-months, 30 (25.86%) patients achieved a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the SIBDQ. Patients with severe baseline anxiety and above-median THC doses were more likely to achieve this MCID (p < 0.050). Twenty (17.24%) patients reported 155 (133.62%) adverse events.
Conclusions: CBMP treatment was associated with improvement in IBD-specific outcomes in patients and general HRQoL over 18-months. However, causation cannot be inferred. Hence, randomized controlled trials are still required.
{"title":"UK medical cannabis registry: an updated analysis of clinical outcomes of cannabis-based medicinal products for inflammatory bowel disease.","authors":"Aashray Gupta, Simon Erridge, Vivian Graf, Monica Kelada, Lara Bapir, Naveen Jesuraj, John Warner-Levy, Evonne Clarke, Katy McLachlan, Ross Coomber, James J Rucker, Michael W Platt, Mikael H Sodergren","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2024.2443574","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17474124.2024.2443574","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain limited, and cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs) provide promise in addressing inflammation and pain. However, long-term data on CBMP efficacy in IBD are scarce. This study examines health-related quality of life (HRQoL) changes in IBD patients treated with CBMPs.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Patients with IBD were identified from the UK Medical Cannabis Registry. Primary outcomes were changes in the short IBD questionnaire (SIBDQ), EQ-5D-5L, single-item sleep quality scale (SQS), and generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7), from baseline to 18-months after CBMP treatment started. Secondary outcomes were adverse event prevalence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 116 patients with IBD included 94 males (81.03%) with a mean age of 39.52 ± 9.12 years. There were improvements in the SIBDQ, GAD-7, SQS, and EQ-5D-5L Index (<i>p</i> < 0.001). At 18-months, 30 (25.86%) patients achieved a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the SIBDQ. Patients with severe baseline anxiety and above-median THC doses were more likely to achieve this MCID (<i>p</i> < 0.050). Twenty (17.24%) patients reported 155 (133.62%) adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBMP treatment was associated with improvement in IBD-specific outcomes in patients and general HRQoL over 18-months. However, causation cannot be inferred. Hence, randomized controlled trials are still required.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"829-838"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2443813
Vishnu Girish, Rakhi Maiwall
Introduction: Patients with cirrhosis are known to be prone to infections. Infections can trigger organ failures and decompensations in cirrhosis. Septic shock can increase mortality by fourfold and cause hemodynamic imbalances, adding to the already hyperdynamic circulation. Management of septic shock in cirrhosis can be tricky due to this complex interplay of altered hemodynamics, immune function, and coagulation.
Areas covered: In this review, we explore the pathophysiological basis, screening, monitoring and management of septic shock in cirrhosis. We also explore novel biomarkers, the growing challenge of multidrug-resistant pathogens and novel and adjunctive therapies. Finally, we propose an algorithm for the management of septic shock in cirrhosis. We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library using the keywords and MeSH terms like 'septic shock,' 'cirrhosis,' 'liver disease,' 'sepsis' among others. The search was restricted to peer-reviewed articles in English.
Expert opinion: The difficulties in managing septic shock in cirrhosis are discussed, emphasizing personalized approaches over protocol-driven care. Fluid and vasopressor management, antibiotic timing and selection, the role of adjunctive therapies, the importance of lactate clearance, gut failure, and the need for further research in this population are highlighted.
{"title":"Revisiting septic shock in cirrhosis: a call for personalized management.","authors":"Vishnu Girish, Rakhi Maiwall","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2024.2443813","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17474124.2024.2443813","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with cirrhosis are known to be prone to infections. Infections can trigger organ failures and decompensations in cirrhosis. Septic shock can increase mortality by fourfold and cause hemodynamic imbalances, adding to the already hyperdynamic circulation. Management of septic shock in cirrhosis can be tricky due to this complex interplay of altered hemodynamics, immune function, and coagulation.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this review, we explore the pathophysiological basis, screening, monitoring and management of septic shock in cirrhosis. We also explore novel biomarkers, the growing challenge of multidrug-resistant pathogens and novel and adjunctive therapies. Finally, we propose an algorithm for the management of septic shock in cirrhosis. We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library using the keywords and MeSH terms like 'septic shock,' 'cirrhosis,' 'liver disease,' 'sepsis' among others. The search was restricted to peer-reviewed articles in English.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The difficulties in managing septic shock in cirrhosis are discussed, emphasizing personalized approaches over protocol-driven care. Fluid and vasopressor management, antibiotic timing and selection, the role of adjunctive therapies, the importance of lactate clearance, gut failure, and the need for further research in this population are highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"795-813"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142914073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}