Kinetic solubility: Experimental and machine-learning modeling perspectives.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Molecular Informatics Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1002/minf.202300216
Shamkhal Baybekov, Pierre Llompart, Gilles Marcou, Patrick Gizzi, Jean-Luc Galzi, Pascal Ramos, Olivier Saurel, Claire Bourban, Claire Minoletti, Alexandre Varnek
{"title":"Kinetic solubility: Experimental and machine-learning modeling perspectives.","authors":"Shamkhal Baybekov, Pierre Llompart, Gilles Marcou, Patrick Gizzi, Jean-Luc Galzi, Pascal Ramos, Olivier Saurel, Claire Bourban, Claire Minoletti, Alexandre Varnek","doi":"10.1002/minf.202300216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kinetic aqueous or buffer solubility is important parameter measuring suitability of compounds for high throughput assays in early drug discovery while thermodynamic solubility is reserved for later stages of drug discovery and development. Kinetic solubility is also considered to have low inter-laboratory reproducibility because of its sensitivity to protocol parameters [1]. Presumably, this is why little efforts have been put to build QSPR models for kinetic in comparison to thermodynamic aqueous solubility. Here, we investigate the reproducibility and modelability of kinetic solubility assays. We first analyzed the relationship between kinetic and thermodynamic solubility data, and then examined the consistency of data from different kinetic assays. In this contribution, we report differences between kinetic and thermodynamic solubility data that are consistent with those reported by others [1, 2] and good agreement between data from different kinetic solubility campaigns in contrast to general expectations. The latter is confirmed by achieving high performing QSPR models trained on merged kinetic solubility datasets. The poor performance of QSPR model trained on thermodynamic solubility when applied to kinetic solubility dataset reinforces the conclusion that kinetic and thermodynamic solubilities do not correlate: one cannot be used as an ersatz for the other. This encourages for building predictive models for kinetic solubility. The kinetic solubility QSPR model developed in this study is freely accessible through the Predictor web service of the Laboratory of Chemoinformatics (https://chematlas.chimie.unistra.fr/cgi-bin/predictor2.cgi).</p>","PeriodicalId":18853,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.202300216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kinetic aqueous or buffer solubility is important parameter measuring suitability of compounds for high throughput assays in early drug discovery while thermodynamic solubility is reserved for later stages of drug discovery and development. Kinetic solubility is also considered to have low inter-laboratory reproducibility because of its sensitivity to protocol parameters [1]. Presumably, this is why little efforts have been put to build QSPR models for kinetic in comparison to thermodynamic aqueous solubility. Here, we investigate the reproducibility and modelability of kinetic solubility assays. We first analyzed the relationship between kinetic and thermodynamic solubility data, and then examined the consistency of data from different kinetic assays. In this contribution, we report differences between kinetic and thermodynamic solubility data that are consistent with those reported by others [1, 2] and good agreement between data from different kinetic solubility campaigns in contrast to general expectations. The latter is confirmed by achieving high performing QSPR models trained on merged kinetic solubility datasets. The poor performance of QSPR model trained on thermodynamic solubility when applied to kinetic solubility dataset reinforces the conclusion that kinetic and thermodynamic solubilities do not correlate: one cannot be used as an ersatz for the other. This encourages for building predictive models for kinetic solubility. The kinetic solubility QSPR model developed in this study is freely accessible through the Predictor web service of the Laboratory of Chemoinformatics (https://chematlas.chimie.unistra.fr/cgi-bin/predictor2.cgi).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动力学溶解度:实验和机器学习建模视角。
[[1]](#ref-0001) 在此,我们研究了动力学溶解度测定的可重复性和可模拟性。我们首先分析了动力学溶解度数据与热力学溶解度数据之间的关系,然后考察了不同动力学测定数据的一致性。在这篇论文中,我们报告了动力学水溶性或缓冲溶液溶解度与热力学溶解度之间的差异。动力学水溶性或缓冲溶液溶解度是衡量化合物是否适合在药物发现早期进行高通量测定的重要参数,而热力学溶解度则保留给药物发现和开发的后期阶段。由于动力学溶解度对方案参数的敏感性,它在实验室间的可重复性也被认为很低。据推测,这就是为什么与热力学水溶性相比,人们很少致力于为动力学溶解度建立 QSPR 模型的原因。在合并的动力学溶解度数据集上训练出的高性能 QSPR 模型证实了后者。在热力学溶解度基础上训练的 QSPR 模型在应用于动力学溶解度数据集时表现不佳,这进一步证明了动力学溶解度和热力学溶解度之间并不存在相关性:二者不能相互替代。这有助于建立动力学溶解度预测模型。本研究开发的动力学溶解度 QSPR 模型可通过化学信息学实验室的 Predictor 网络服务([https://chematlas.chimie.unistra.fr/cgi-bin/predictor2.cgi](https://chematlas.chimie.unistra.fr/cgi-bin/predictor2.cgi))免费访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Informatics
Molecular Informatics CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
70
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Informatics is a peer-reviewed, international forum for publication of high-quality, interdisciplinary research on all molecular aspects of bio/cheminformatics and computer-assisted molecular design. Molecular Informatics succeeded QSAR & Combinatorial Science in 2010. Molecular Informatics presents methodological innovations that will lead to a deeper understanding of ligand-receptor interactions, macromolecular complexes, molecular networks, design concepts and processes that demonstrate how ideas and design concepts lead to molecules with a desired structure or function, preferably including experimental validation. The journal''s scope includes but is not limited to the fields of drug discovery and chemical biology, protein and nucleic acid engineering and design, the design of nanomolecular structures, strategies for modeling of macromolecular assemblies, molecular networks and systems, pharmaco- and chemogenomics, computer-assisted screening strategies, as well as novel technologies for the de novo design of biologically active molecules. As a unique feature Molecular Informatics publishes so-called "Methods Corner" review-type articles which feature important technological concepts and advances within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Cover Picture: (Mol. Inf. 9/2024) The freedom space - a new set of commercially available molecules for hit discovery. Cover Picture: (Mol. Inf. 8/2024) Chemography-guided analysis of a reaction path network for ethylene hydrogenation with a model Wilkinson's catalyst. Sulfotransferase-mediated phase II drug metabolism prediction of substrates and sites using accessibility and reactivity-based algorithms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1