Automation in Contemporary Clinical Information Systems: a Survey of AI in Healthcare Settings.

Yearbook of medical informatics Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-26 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1768733
Farah Magrabi, David Lyell, Enrico Coiera
{"title":"Automation in Contemporary Clinical Information Systems: a Survey of AI in Healthcare Settings.","authors":"Farah Magrabi, David Lyell, Enrico Coiera","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To examine the nature and use of automation in contemporary clinical information systems by reviewing studies reporting the implementation and evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, the tables of contents of major informatics journals, and the bibliographies of articles were searched for studies reporting evaluation of AI in clinical settings from January 2021 to December 2022. We documented the clinical application areas and tasks supported, and the level of system autonomy. Reported effects on user experience, decision-making, care delivery and outcomes were summarised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI technologies are being applied in a wide variety of clinical areas. Most contemporary systems utilise deep learning, use routinely collected data, support diagnosis and triage, are assistive (requiring users to confirm or approve AI provided information or decisions), and are used by doctors in acute care settings in high-income nations. AI systems are integrated and used within existing clinical information systems including electronic medical records. There is limited support for One Health goals. Evaluation is largely based on quantitative methods measuring effects on decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI systems are being implemented and evaluated in many clinical areas. There remain many opportunities to understand patterns of routine use and evaluate effects on decision-making, care delivery and patient outcomes using mixed-methods. Support for One Health including integrating data about environmental factors and social determinants needs further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":40027,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of medical informatics","volume":"32 1","pages":"115-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10751141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To examine the nature and use of automation in contemporary clinical information systems by reviewing studies reporting the implementation and evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare settings.

Method: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, the tables of contents of major informatics journals, and the bibliographies of articles were searched for studies reporting evaluation of AI in clinical settings from January 2021 to December 2022. We documented the clinical application areas and tasks supported, and the level of system autonomy. Reported effects on user experience, decision-making, care delivery and outcomes were summarised.

Results: AI technologies are being applied in a wide variety of clinical areas. Most contemporary systems utilise deep learning, use routinely collected data, support diagnosis and triage, are assistive (requiring users to confirm or approve AI provided information or decisions), and are used by doctors in acute care settings in high-income nations. AI systems are integrated and used within existing clinical information systems including electronic medical records. There is limited support for One Health goals. Evaluation is largely based on quantitative methods measuring effects on decision-making.

Conclusion: AI systems are being implemented and evaluated in many clinical areas. There remain many opportunities to understand patterns of routine use and evaluate effects on decision-making, care delivery and patient outcomes using mixed-methods. Support for One Health including integrating data about environmental factors and social determinants needs further exploration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代临床信息系统中的自动化:医疗机构中的人工智能调查。
目的和目标通过回顾报道医疗机构中人工智能(AI)技术的实施和评估的研究,研究当代临床信息系统中自动化的性质和使用情况:方法:我们检索了 PubMed/MEDLINE、Web of Science、EMBASE、主要信息学期刊的目录以及文章的参考书目,以查找 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间报告临床环境中人工智能评估的研究。我们记录了所支持的临床应用领域和任务,以及系统的自主程度。我们总结了所报告的对用户体验、决策、护理服务和结果的影响:人工智能技术正在广泛应用于各种临床领域。大多数当代系统利用深度学习,使用常规收集的数据,支持诊断和分流,具有辅助功能(要求用户确认或批准人工智能提供的信息或决策),并由高收入国家急症护理环境中的医生使用。人工智能系统被集成并用于现有的临床信息系统,包括电子病历。对 "一体健康 "目标的支持有限。评估主要基于定量方法,衡量对决策的影响:结论:许多临床领域正在实施和评估人工智能系统。仍有很多机会了解常规使用模式,并使用混合方法评估对决策、护理服务和患者预后的影响。需要进一步探索对 "一体健康 "的支持,包括整合有关环境因素和社会决定因素的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Yearbook of medical informatics
Yearbook of medical informatics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Published by the International Medical Informatics Association, this annual publication includes the best papers in medical informatics from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Reflections Towards the Future of Medical Informatics. The Impact of Clinical Decision Support on Health Disparities and the Digital Divide. Health Information Exchange: Understanding the Policy Landscape and Future of Data Interoperability. The Need for Green and Responsible Medical Informatics and Digital Health: Looking Forward with One Digital Health. Health Equity in Clinical Research Informatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1