Evaluating Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Mono-exponential, Bi-exponential, and Stretched-exponential Models of Diffusion-weighted Imaging.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Thoracic Imaging Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-28 DOI:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000771
Yu Zheng, Na Han, Wenjing Huang, Yanli Jiang, Jing Zhang
{"title":"Evaluating Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Mono-exponential, Bi-exponential, and Stretched-exponential Models of Diffusion-weighted Imaging.","authors":"Yu Zheng, Na Han, Wenjing Huang, Yanli Jiang, Jing Zhang","doi":"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore and compare the diagnostic values of mono-exponential, bi-exponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) parameters of primary lesions and lymph nodes (LNs) to predict mediastinal LN metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Sixty-one patients with non-small cell lung cancer underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, including multiple b -value DWI. The DWI parameters, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from a mono-exponential model, true diffusion (D) coefficient, pseudo-diffusion (D*) coefficient, and perfusion fraction (f) from a bi-exponential model, distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) and intravoxel diffusion heterogeneity index (α) from a stretched-exponential model of primary tumors and LNs and the size characteristics of LNs, were measured and compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to establish models for predicting mediastinal LN metastasis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to evaluate diagnostic performances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DWI parameters of primary tumors showed no statistical significance between LN metastasis-positive and LN metastasis-negative groups. Nonmetastatic LNs had significantly higher ADC, D, DDC, and α values compared with metastatic LNs (all P < 0.05). The short-dimension, long-dimension, and short-long dimension ratio of metastatic LNs was significantly larger than those of nonmetastatic ones (all P < 0.05). The D value showed the best diagnostic performance among all DWI-derived single parameters, and the short dimension of LNs performed the same among all the size variables. Furthermore, the combination of DWI parameters (ADC and D) and the short dimension of LNs can significantly improve diagnostic efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ADC, D, DDC, and α from the mono-exponential, bi-exponential, and stretched-exponential models were demonstrated efficient in differentiating benign from metastatic LNs, and the combination of ADC, D, and short dimension of LNs may have a better diagnostic performance than DWI or size-derived parameters either in combination or individually.</p>","PeriodicalId":49974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"285-292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000771","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore and compare the diagnostic values of mono-exponential, bi-exponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) parameters of primary lesions and lymph nodes (LNs) to predict mediastinal LN metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Patients and methods: Sixty-one patients with non-small cell lung cancer underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, including multiple b -value DWI. The DWI parameters, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from a mono-exponential model, true diffusion (D) coefficient, pseudo-diffusion (D*) coefficient, and perfusion fraction (f) from a bi-exponential model, distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) and intravoxel diffusion heterogeneity index (α) from a stretched-exponential model of primary tumors and LNs and the size characteristics of LNs, were measured and compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to establish models for predicting mediastinal LN metastasis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to evaluate diagnostic performances.

Results: The DWI parameters of primary tumors showed no statistical significance between LN metastasis-positive and LN metastasis-negative groups. Nonmetastatic LNs had significantly higher ADC, D, DDC, and α values compared with metastatic LNs (all P < 0.05). The short-dimension, long-dimension, and short-long dimension ratio of metastatic LNs was significantly larger than those of nonmetastatic ones (all P < 0.05). The D value showed the best diagnostic performance among all DWI-derived single parameters, and the short dimension of LNs performed the same among all the size variables. Furthermore, the combination of DWI parameters (ADC and D) and the short dimension of LNs can significantly improve diagnostic efficiency.

Conclusions: The ADC, D, DDC, and α from the mono-exponential, bi-exponential, and stretched-exponential models were demonstrated efficient in differentiating benign from metastatic LNs, and the combination of ADC, D, and short dimension of LNs may have a better diagnostic performance than DWI or size-derived parameters either in combination or individually.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用扩散加权成像的单指数、双指数和拉伸指数模型评估非小细胞肺癌的纵隔淋巴结转移。
目的:探讨并比较原发病灶和淋巴结(LN)的单指数、双指数和拉伸指数弥散加权成像(DWI)参数在预测非小细胞肺癌患者纵隔LN转移方面的诊断价值:61名非小细胞肺癌患者接受了术前磁共振成像,包括多b值DWI。测量并比较了原发肿瘤和LN的DWI参数,包括单指数模型的表观扩散系数(ADC)、真扩散系数(D)、假扩散系数(D*)和双指数模型的灌注分数(f)、分布扩散系数(DDC)和拉伸指数模型的体细胞内扩散异质性指数(α)以及LN的大小特征。采用多变量逻辑回归分析建立纵隔LN转移预测模型。应用接收者操作特征分析评估诊断效果:原发肿瘤的 DWI 参数在 LN 转移阳性组和 LN 转移阴性组之间没有统计学意义。与转移性 LN 相比,非转移性 LN 的 ADC、D、DDC 和 α 值明显更高(均 P <0.05)。转移性 LN 的短维度、长维度和短长维度比值明显大于非转移性 LN(均 P < 0.05)。在所有 DWI 衍生的单一参数中,D 值显示出最佳的诊断性能,而在所有尺寸变量中,LN 的短尺寸表现相同。此外,DWI参数(ADC和D)与LNs短维度的结合可显著提高诊断效率:结论:单指数、双指数和拉伸指数模型中的 ADC、D、DDC 和 α 被证明能有效区分良性和转移性 LN,ADC、D 和 LN 短维度的组合可能比 DWI 或尺寸衍生参数的组合或单独使用具有更好的诊断效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Journal of Thoracic Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Imaging (JTI) provides authoritative information on all aspects of the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Original articles and analytical reviews published in this timely journal provide the very latest thinking of leading experts concerning the use of chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and all other promising imaging techniques in cardiopulmonary radiology. Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology European Society of Thoracic Imaging.
期刊最新文献
Spatial Resolution Fidelity Comparison Between Energy Integrating and Deep Silicon Photon Counting CT: Implications for Pulmonary Imaging. Incidental Apical Pleuroparenchymal Scarring on Computed Tomography: Diagnostic Yield, Progression, Morphologic Features and Clinical Significance. The Relationship Between Cardiac CT-based Left Atrial Structure and Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Postablation Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Within 2 Years. Left Atrial Strain for Prediction of Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking. Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression Provides Incremental Prognostic Value and Optimizes Risk Reclassification by Computed Tomography Angiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1