Refusal of the hospitalization: a distressed dilemma in obstetric practice.

IF 3.1 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Therapeutic advances in reproductive health Pub Date : 2023-12-25 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334941231216531
Canan Unal, Erdem Fadiloglu, Murat Cagan, Gunel Ziyadova, Esra Kaya, Atakan Tanacan, Mehmet Sinan Beksac
{"title":"Refusal of the hospitalization: a distressed dilemma in obstetric practice.","authors":"Canan Unal, Erdem Fadiloglu, Murat Cagan, Gunel Ziyadova, Esra Kaya, Atakan Tanacan, Mehmet Sinan Beksac","doi":"10.1177/26334941231216531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnant women are a special population in which hospitalizations are more recommended due to physiological changes mimicking pathologies and medico-legal concerns.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess the obstetric outcomes of expectant mothers who were admitted to the obstetrics emergency outpatient clinic and declined the hospitalization advised by doctors. Additionally, we examined the appropriateness of physicians' recommendations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We have retrospectively evaluated the patients admitted to the 'Obstetric Emergency Outpatient Clinic' and refused hospitalization between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cases were classified into three groups based on the trimester, considering the substantial variation between complaints and complications in each trimester. The complaints of pregnant women were categorized as psychosocial causes, obstetric complications, maternal systemic complaints, and suspicion of labor. We evaluated the compatibility of the hospitalization decision with the pregnancy outcome of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 958 pregnant women were included in the study. Leading causes for admissions were obstetric complications, maternal systemic complaints, and suspicion of labor in first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. Psychosocial causes were mostly observed in the second trimester. Readmission to the hospital within a week was highest in the third trimester group. According to pregnancy outcomes, 12.5% (94/753) of our recommendations were appropriate in all trimesters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Obstetricians seem overcautious in managing obstetric patients and willing to offer hospitalization more often than the actual requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":75219,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10752054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334941231216531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pregnant women are a special population in which hospitalizations are more recommended due to physiological changes mimicking pathologies and medico-legal concerns.

Objectives: We aimed to assess the obstetric outcomes of expectant mothers who were admitted to the obstetrics emergency outpatient clinic and declined the hospitalization advised by doctors. Additionally, we examined the appropriateness of physicians' recommendations.

Design: We have retrospectively evaluated the patients admitted to the 'Obstetric Emergency Outpatient Clinic' and refused hospitalization between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019.

Methods: Cases were classified into three groups based on the trimester, considering the substantial variation between complaints and complications in each trimester. The complaints of pregnant women were categorized as psychosocial causes, obstetric complications, maternal systemic complaints, and suspicion of labor. We evaluated the compatibility of the hospitalization decision with the pregnancy outcome of patients.

Results: A total of 958 pregnant women were included in the study. Leading causes for admissions were obstetric complications, maternal systemic complaints, and suspicion of labor in first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. Psychosocial causes were mostly observed in the second trimester. Readmission to the hospital within a week was highest in the third trimester group. According to pregnancy outcomes, 12.5% (94/753) of our recommendations were appropriate in all trimesters.

Conclusion: Obstetricians seem overcautious in managing obstetric patients and willing to offer hospitalization more often than the actual requirements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拒绝住院:产科实践中的两难困境。
背景:孕妇是一个特殊人群,由于生理变化模拟病理和医疗法律问题,她们更需要住院治疗:我们的目的是评估在产科急诊门诊住院并拒绝医生建议住院的孕妇的产科结果。此外,我们还研究了医生建议的适当性:我们对 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间在 "产科急诊门诊 "住院并拒绝住院治疗的患者进行了回顾性评估:考虑到每个孕期的主诉和并发症之间存在很大差异,根据孕期将病例分为三组。孕妇的主诉分为社会心理原因、产科并发症、产妇系统性主诉和怀疑分娩。我们评估了住院决定与患者妊娠结局的匹配性:研究共纳入 958 名孕妇。入院的主要原因分别是产科并发症、孕产妇全身不适以及第一、第二和第三孕期怀疑分娩。心理社会原因主要出现在第二孕期。第三孕期组在一周内再次入院的比例最高。根据妊娠结果,12.5%(94/753)的建议在所有孕期都是适当的:结论:产科医生在管理产科病人时似乎过于谨慎,愿意提供的住院治疗次数多于实际需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparing visual estimation and hematocrit change in the assessment of blood loss among women undergoing cesarean delivery in a tertiary facility in northern Uganda. Exploring challenges to the uptake of sexual and reproductive health services among lesbian and bisexual women in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe: a qualitative enquiry. The role of artificial intelligence in transforming maternity services in Africa: prospects and challenges. Comparison of urine protein-creatinine ratio and urine dipstick test for significant proteinuria in preeclamptic women. Reproductive and oncologic outcomes in young women with uterine sarcoma undergoing fertility-sparing treatment: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1