The effect of shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of delaminated partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Ruochen Li, Han Xue, Zheyue Zhu, Guangwei Wu, Yipeng Cui, Chen Zhang, Miao Li
{"title":"The effect of shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of delaminated partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.","authors":"Ruochen Li, Han Xue, Zheyue Zhu, Guangwei Wu, Yipeng Cui, Chen Zhang, Miao Li","doi":"10.11152/mu-4251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of shear wave elastography (SWE) in diagnosing delaminated partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (DPT-RCT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was carried out on 137 patients with DPT-RCT. The study included complete clinical data, including the images of conventional ultrasound (US), SWE, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and shoulder arthroscopic surgery. The features of US, SWE, and MRI were evaluated. The study analysed the Shear-Wave Velocity (SWV) among three types of DPT-RCT, and between the regions of tears, normal contralateral, and affected unilateral supraspinatus tendon. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The SWE detection rate was significantly higher (91.2%) compared to US (73.7%) and MRI (87.6%) for the overall diagnosis of DPT-RCT. Similarly, SWE yielded higher rates of detection for types 1 (89.5%) and 2 (92.3%) of DPT-RCT as compared to US (71.7%, 69.2%) and MRI (81.6%, 94.9%), respectively. However, there was no significant difference in the accuracy of diagnosing type 3 among the three methods. The SWV of the 137 supraspinatus tendon tears was 3.64±0.60 m/s, which was higher than that of the normal supraspinatus tendon (2.43±0.47 m/s, p<0.01) as well as the region of tears (1.61±0.54 m/s, p<0.01). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in SWV among the three types of DPT-RCT. The cutoff thresholds of SWV for identifying normal tendon from DPT-RCT and for identifying DPT-RCT from the region of tears were 2.96m/s and 2.39m/s, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SWE with SWV can provide both quantitative and qualitative diagnostic information for DPT-RCT, which can be used as a crucial supplement imaging method.</p>","PeriodicalId":94138,"journal":{"name":"Medical ultrasonography","volume":"25 4","pages":"390-397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-4251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of shear wave elastography (SWE) in diagnosing delaminated partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (DPT-RCT).

Material and methods: A retrospective study was carried out on 137 patients with DPT-RCT. The study included complete clinical data, including the images of conventional ultrasound (US), SWE, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and shoulder arthroscopic surgery. The features of US, SWE, and MRI were evaluated. The study analysed the Shear-Wave Velocity (SWV) among three types of DPT-RCT, and between the regions of tears, normal contralateral, and affected unilateral supraspinatus tendon. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were evaluated.

Results:  The SWE detection rate was significantly higher (91.2%) compared to US (73.7%) and MRI (87.6%) for the overall diagnosis of DPT-RCT. Similarly, SWE yielded higher rates of detection for types 1 (89.5%) and 2 (92.3%) of DPT-RCT as compared to US (71.7%, 69.2%) and MRI (81.6%, 94.9%), respectively. However, there was no significant difference in the accuracy of diagnosing type 3 among the three methods. The SWV of the 137 supraspinatus tendon tears was 3.64±0.60 m/s, which was higher than that of the normal supraspinatus tendon (2.43±0.47 m/s, p<0.01) as well as the region of tears (1.61±0.54 m/s, p<0.01). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in SWV among the three types of DPT-RCT. The cutoff thresholds of SWV for identifying normal tendon from DPT-RCT and for identifying DPT-RCT from the region of tears were 2.96m/s and 2.39m/s, respectively.

Conclusions: SWE with SWV can provide both quantitative and qualitative diagnostic information for DPT-RCT, which can be used as a crucial supplement imaging method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剪切波弹性成像在诊断分层部分厚度肩袖撕裂中的作用。
目的:评估剪切波弹性成像(SWE)在诊断分层部分厚度肩袖撕裂(DPT-RCT)中的有效性:对 137 名 DPT-RCT 患者进行了回顾性研究。研究包括完整的临床数据,包括常规超声(US)、SWE、磁共振成像(MRI)和肩关节镜手术的图像。对超声波、SWE 和核磁共振成像的特征进行了评估。研究分析了三种类型的 DPT-RCT 之间的剪切波速度(SWV),以及撕裂区域、正常对侧和受影响的单侧冈上肌腱之间的剪切波速度。此外,还对接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)进行了评估: 在 DPT-RCT 的总体诊断中,SWE 的检出率(91.2%)明显高于 US(73.7%)和 MRI(87.6%)。同样,与 US(71.7%,69.2%)和 MRI(81.6%,94.9%)相比,SWE 对 DPT-RCT 1 型(89.5%)和 2 型(92.3%)的检出率更高。然而,三种方法诊断 3 型的准确率没有明显差异。137 例冈上肌腱撕裂的 SWV 为 3.64±0.60 m/s,高于正常冈上肌腱的 SWV(2.43±0.47 m/s,p 结论:带 SWV 的 SWE 可为 DPT-RCT 提供定量和定性诊断信息,可作为一种重要的辅助成像方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic accuracy of transcranial ultrasonography for detecting stenosis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatic cancer liver metastasis mimicking focal nodular hyperplasia. A case report. The impact of bowel preparation on MRI scans for confirming rectosigmoid endometriosis detected by transvaginal ultrasonography. Advancements and challenges in Shear-Wave Elastography of tendons: a comprehensive review. An [illustrative] update on pediatric emergency ultrasound: part 3 - cerebral, musculoskeletal and other applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1