The precursors of AI adoption in business: Towards an efficient decision-making and functional performance

IF 20.1 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE International Journal of Information Management Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102745
Abdullah M. Baabdullah
{"title":"The precursors of AI adoption in business: Towards an efficient decision-making and functional performance","authors":"Abdullah M. Baabdullah","doi":"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is a highly effective solution for enhancing decision-making efficiency and optimising the functional performance of organisations. However, there have been limited attempts to assess the consequences of implementing AI systems on the quality and efficiency of decision-making. This study proposes and empirically examines an extended model covering all aspects that would shape the successful adoption of AI by decision-makers while investigating how the successful adoption of AI enhances the efficiency of the decision-making process. This study also intends to test the validity of the integrated AI acceptance-avoidance model (IAAAM) proposed by Cao et al. (2021) using the Middle East context (i.e. Saudi Arabia). The extended model of the current study was based on the IAAAM and IS professional distinctiveness (ISPD). Two quantitative studies were conducted to achieve the research objectives. The first study was conducted to validate the IAAAM using a purposive sample of employees (non-adopters of AI applications). The second study tested the proposed model using a purposive sample of employees (actual adopters). The structural equation modelling (SEM) results of the first study (non-adopters) supported the validity of the IAAAM in Saudi Arabia. Factors (performance expectancy (PE), facilitating conditions (FC), personal well-being concern (PWC), perceived threat (PT), and attitudes (ATT)) had a significant impact on either ATT or the intention to use AI. The SEM results of actual adopters supported the impact of PE, EE, FC, PWC, and ATT on either ATT or the adoption of AI (AoAI). As an external factor, the ISPD was the most significant predictor of AoAI. The AoAI was confirmed to strongly predict decision-making efficiency, which, in turn, contributes to functional performance. This study enriches the current understanding of the main factors that contribute to the successful implementation of AI systems, offering an in-depth understanding of both AI adopters and non-adopters. It identifies factors important to non-users to enhance future adoption, whereas current AI users focus on improving decision-making quality with the AI assistance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48422,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401223001263","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a highly effective solution for enhancing decision-making efficiency and optimising the functional performance of organisations. However, there have been limited attempts to assess the consequences of implementing AI systems on the quality and efficiency of decision-making. This study proposes and empirically examines an extended model covering all aspects that would shape the successful adoption of AI by decision-makers while investigating how the successful adoption of AI enhances the efficiency of the decision-making process. This study also intends to test the validity of the integrated AI acceptance-avoidance model (IAAAM) proposed by Cao et al. (2021) using the Middle East context (i.e. Saudi Arabia). The extended model of the current study was based on the IAAAM and IS professional distinctiveness (ISPD). Two quantitative studies were conducted to achieve the research objectives. The first study was conducted to validate the IAAAM using a purposive sample of employees (non-adopters of AI applications). The second study tested the proposed model using a purposive sample of employees (actual adopters). The structural equation modelling (SEM) results of the first study (non-adopters) supported the validity of the IAAAM in Saudi Arabia. Factors (performance expectancy (PE), facilitating conditions (FC), personal well-being concern (PWC), perceived threat (PT), and attitudes (ATT)) had a significant impact on either ATT or the intention to use AI. The SEM results of actual adopters supported the impact of PE, EE, FC, PWC, and ATT on either ATT or the adoption of AI (AoAI). As an external factor, the ISPD was the most significant predictor of AoAI. The AoAI was confirmed to strongly predict decision-making efficiency, which, in turn, contributes to functional performance. This study enriches the current understanding of the main factors that contribute to the successful implementation of AI systems, offering an in-depth understanding of both AI adopters and non-adopters. It identifies factors important to non-users to enhance future adoption, whereas current AI users focus on improving decision-making quality with the AI assistance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业采用人工智能的先兆:实现高效决策和职能绩效
人工智能(AI)是提高决策效率和优化组织职能绩效的高效解决方案。然而,对实施人工智能系统对决策质量和效率的影响进行评估的尝试还很有限。本研究提出了一个扩展模型,并对其进行了实证检验,该模型涵盖了影响决策者成功采用人工智能的所有方面,同时研究了成功采用人工智能如何提高决策过程的效率。本研究还打算在中东地区(即沙特阿拉伯)检验 Cao 等人(2021 年)提出的人工智能接受-规避综合模型(IAAAM)的有效性。本研究的扩展模型基于 IAAAM 和信息系统专业独特性(ISPD)。为实现研究目标,进行了两项定量研究。第一项研究使用员工(人工智能应用的非采用者)的目的性样本验证了 IAAAM。第二项研究利用员工(实际采用者)的目的性样本对所提出的模型进行了测试。第一项研究(非采用者)的结构方程模型(SEM)结果支持了沙特阿拉伯 IAAAM 的有效性。各因素(绩效预期 (PE)、便利条件 (FC)、个人福祉关注 (PWC)、感知威胁 (PT) 和态度 (ATT))对 ATT 或使用人工智能的意向均有显著影响。实际采用者的 SEM 结果支持 PE、EE、FC、PWC 和 ATT 对 ATT 或采用人工智能(AoAI)的影响。作为外部因素,ISPD 是预测 AoAI 的最重要因素。AoAI 被证实能有力地预测决策效率,而决策效率反过来又有助于提高职能绩效。这项研究丰富了当前对有助于成功实施人工智能系统的主要因素的理解,深入了解了人工智能采用者和非采用者的情况。它确定了对未采用者重要的因素,以促进未来的采用,而当前的人工智能用户则侧重于在人工智能的帮助下提高决策质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Management
International Journal of Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Management (IJIM) is a distinguished, international, and peer-reviewed journal dedicated to providing its readers with top-notch analysis and discussions within the evolving field of information management. Key features of the journal include: Comprehensive Coverage: IJIM keeps readers informed with major papers, reports, and reviews. Topical Relevance: The journal remains current and relevant through Viewpoint articles and regular features like Research Notes, Case Studies, and a Reviews section, ensuring readers are updated on contemporary issues. Focus on Quality: IJIM prioritizes high-quality papers that address contemporary issues in information management.
期刊最新文献
Using the influence of human-as-machine representation for self-improvement products The exploration of users’ perceived value from personalization and virtual conversational agents to enable a smart home assemblage– A mixed method approach Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology for sustainable technologies context Unrequited love? A mixed-methods study of parasocial engagement with social media influencers Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1