{"title":"The legal personality of foreign states in civil law: l’affaire Zappa and the bequest of the Marquise du Plessis-Bellière","authors":"Laurens van Apeldoorn","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20233408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>This article traces the doctrinal debate on the civil legal personality of foreign states occasioned by two famous legal cases during the closing decade of the nineteenth century: the protracted conflict between Greece and Romania following Evangelis Zappa’s bequest of immovable property located in Romania to the Greek state for the purpose of resurrecting the Olympic Games, and the contested will of the Marquise du Plessis-Bellière which named Pope Leo xiii as legatee of real estate located in France. As Ernst Rabel and others have thought, the debate confirmed the scholarly consensus that the recognition given to a foreign state according to the rules of public international law, implies recognition of its capacity in private law matters. The objective of this article is to reconstruct the considerations that led to this apparent consensus, thus helping to facilitate an assessment of the persuasiveness of those considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":"351 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20233408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Summary
This article traces the doctrinal debate on the civil legal personality of foreign states occasioned by two famous legal cases during the closing decade of the nineteenth century: the protracted conflict between Greece and Romania following Evangelis Zappa’s bequest of immovable property located in Romania to the Greek state for the purpose of resurrecting the Olympic Games, and the contested will of the Marquise du Plessis-Bellière which named Pope Leo xiii as legatee of real estate located in France. As Ernst Rabel and others have thought, the debate confirmed the scholarly consensus that the recognition given to a foreign state according to the rules of public international law, implies recognition of its capacity in private law matters. The objective of this article is to reconstruct the considerations that led to this apparent consensus, thus helping to facilitate an assessment of the persuasiveness of those considerations.
摘要 本文追溯了十九世纪最后十年间两个著名的法律案件所引发的关于外国民事法律人格的理论辩论:伊万吉利斯-扎帕(Evangelis Zappa)为恢复奥林匹克运动会而将位于罗马尼亚的不动产遗赠给希腊之后,希腊与罗马尼亚之间发生的旷日持久的冲突;以及普莱西斯-贝利耶尔侯爵夫人(Marquise du Plessis-Bellière)指定教皇利奥十三世(Pope Leo xiii)为位于法国的不动产的受遗赠人的有争议的遗嘱。正如恩斯特-拉贝尔(Ernst Rabel)等人所认为的那样,辩论证实了学术界的共识,即根据国际公法规则对外国的承认意味着承认其在私法事务中的能力。本文的目的是重构导致这一明显共识的考虑因素,从而有助于评估这些考虑因素的说服力。