首页 > 最新文献

The Legal History Review最新文献

英文 中文
Private legal practice and public authority in early Venetian Ithaca: thirteen new notarial documents (1575–1599) 早期威尼斯伊萨卡的私人法律实践与公共权力:13 份新的公证文件(1575-1599 年)
Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1163/15718190-20241205
K. Nikias

Summary

The Greek notarial documents produced in the centuries after the fall of Byzantine rule are important sources for retracing the development of private legal practices under the influence of the different administrative and legal orders which came to rule the Greek-speaking territories. In the vast areas which came under Venetian control, the system of private transactions was conditioned by a tension between the widespread practice of notaries operating as private professionals during the Byzantine period, and the intervention of Venetian administrators who sought to regulate notaries as public officers. This article considers this tension in an understudied peripheral context, the small island of Ithaca in the period of early Venetian rule, through an analysis of thirteen new Greek notarial sources from 1575–1599 which are presented here in a critical edition. Owing to the small size of the Ithacan economy and the informality of the island’s administration during the sixteenth century, private transactions were executed mainly by independent scribes, priests, and in some cases by public notaries from neighbouring Cephalonia. This was gradually changed by successive regulatory interventions by the Venetians which formalised administrative structures on Ithaca, traced here through several unpublished sources from the local archives, in addition to documents from Cephalonia and Venice. These reforms led to the establishment of a system of publicly appointed and supervised notaries on Ithaca in the early seventeenth century, putting the freer practice of the earlier period under the closer control of the public administration and bringing Ithaca into line with practices in the larger Venetian possessions.

摘要拜占庭统治衰落后几个世纪中产生的希腊公证文件是追溯在统治希腊语地区的不同行政和法律秩序影响下私人法律实践发展的重要资料。在威尼斯人控制下的广大地区,私人交易制度受制于拜占庭时期公证人作为私人专业人士的普遍做法与威尼斯人管理者试图将公证人作为公职人员进行管理的干预之间的矛盾。本文通过分析 1575-1599 年间的 13 篇新的希腊公证资料,探讨了这一紧张关系在一个未被充分研究的边缘背景--早期威尼斯统治时期的伊萨卡小岛--中的影响。在 16 世纪,由于伊萨卡经济规模较小,岛上的行政管理也不正规,私人交易主要由独立的抄写员和牧师执行,在某些情况下由来自邻近的塞法罗尼亚的公证人执行。这种情况逐渐被威尼斯人的连续监管措施所改变,这些措施使伊萨卡岛的行政管理结构正规化,除了来自塞法罗尼亚和威尼斯的文件外,这里还可以通过当地档案馆的一些未发表的资料进行追溯。这些改革导致 17 世纪初在伊萨卡建立了一个由政府任命和监督的公证人系统,将早期较为自由的做法置于公共管理机构的严密控制之下,并使伊萨卡与更大的威尼斯属地的做法保持一致。
{"title":"Private legal practice and public authority in early Venetian Ithaca: thirteen new notarial documents (1575–1599)","authors":"K. Nikias","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20241205","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20241205","url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>The Greek notarial documents produced in the centuries after the fall of Byzantine rule are important sources for retracing the development of private legal practices under the influence of the different administrative and legal orders which came to rule the Greek-speaking territories. In the vast areas which came under Venetian control, the system of private transactions was conditioned by a tension between the widespread practice of notaries operating as private professionals during the Byzantine period, and the intervention of Venetian administrators who sought to regulate notaries as public officers. This article considers this tension in an understudied peripheral context, the small island of Ithaca in the period of early Venetian rule, through an analysis of thirteen new Greek notarial sources from 1575–1599 which are presented here in a critical edition. Owing to the small size of the Ithacan economy and the informality of the island’s administration during the sixteenth century, private transactions were executed mainly by independent scribes, priests, and in some cases by public notaries from neighbouring Cephalonia. This was gradually changed by successive regulatory interventions by the Venetians which formalised administrative structures on Ithaca, traced here through several unpublished sources from the local archives, in addition to documents from Cephalonia and Venice. These reforms led to the establishment of a system of publicly appointed and supervised notaries on Ithaca in the early seventeenth century, putting the freer practice of the earlier period under the closer control of the public administration and bringing Ithaca into line with practices in the larger Venetian possessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142191215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bonfante, Vacca, Ankum: acquisition of ownership of res mancipi abandoned by their owner, Pomp. D. 41,7,5pr. Bonfante、Vacca、Ankum:获得被其所有者遗弃的res mancipi的所有权,Pomp.D. 41,7,5pr.
Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1163/15718190-20241212
Jeroen M.J. Chorus

Summary

Pomponius, Digest 41,7,5pr., presents many difficulties. It holds, inter alia, that if the possessor of a thing abandoned by its owner, did not have that thing in bonis, the person who bought it from him, knowing that it had been abandoned, will usucapt it. But this seems to conflict with § 1, asserting that the acquirer of an abandoned thing becomes its dominus at once, without usucapio. Bonfante saw that the principium concerns only res mancipi and § 1 only res nec mancipi. Vacca did not agree, but subscribed to part of Bonfante’s interpretation. Both Bonfante and Vacca, however, introduced an element not mentioned by Pomponius: that the selling possessor ignored that the thing had been abandoned by its owner and, instead, thought the thing was res aliena. Ankum rejected that introduction and gave an interpretation (and reconstruction) of the fragment without the contested element. It is argued that Ankum’s interpretation should prevail.

摘要 庞波尼乌斯(Pomponius)的《摘要》(Digest 41,7,5pr.)提出了许多难题。它认为,除其他外,如果一件被其所有者遗弃的物品的拥有者并不拥有该物品的所有权,那么从他手中买下该物品的人在知道该物品已被遗弃的情况下,将使用该物品。但这似乎与第 1 节相冲突,因为第 1 节断言,被遗弃之物的取得者立即成为其支配者,而无需使用权。Bonfante 认为原则只涉及 res mancipi,而 § 1 只涉及 res nec mancipi。瓦卡并不同意,但赞同邦凡特的部分解释。然而,邦凡特和瓦卡都引入了庞波尼乌斯没有提到的一个因素:出售占有人无视该物已被其所有者遗弃,反而认为该物是异物。安库姆拒绝了这一引入,并在没有争议要素的情况下对该片段进行了解释(和重构)。据认为,应以 Ankum 的解释为准。
{"title":"Bonfante, Vacca, Ankum: acquisition of ownership of res mancipi abandoned by their owner, Pomp. D. 41,7,5pr.","authors":"Jeroen M.J. Chorus","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20241212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20241212","url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>Pomponius, Digest 41,7,5<em>pr</em>., presents many difficulties. It holds, <em>inter alia</em>, that if the possessor of a thing abandoned by its owner, did not have that thing <em>in bonis</em>, the person who bought it from him, knowing that it had been abandoned, will usucapt it. But this seems to conflict with § 1, asserting that the acquirer of an abandoned thing becomes its <em>dominus</em> at once, without <em>usucapio</em>. Bonfante saw that the <em>principium</em> concerns only <em>res mancipi</em> and § 1 only <em>res nec mancipi</em>. Vacca did not agree, but subscribed to part of Bonfante’s interpretation. Both Bonfante and Vacca, however, introduced an element not mentioned by Pomponius: that the selling possessor ignored that the thing had been abandoned by its owner and, instead, thought the thing was <em>res aliena</em>. Ankum rejected that introduction and gave an interpretation (and reconstruction) of the fragment without the contested element. It is argued that Ankum’s interpretation should prevail.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142191232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The issue of sexuality in Italian penitentiary law: a 1930s debate between international influences and fascist prison policies 意大利监狱法中的性问题:20 世纪 30 年代国际影响与法西斯监狱政策之间的辩论
Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1163/15718190-20241211
Gianmarco Palmieri

Summary

This article delves into a crucial yet understudied aspect of Italian penitentiary history during the 1930s: the intricate interplay between international influences and the development of fascist prison policies with regard to issues of sexuality. Drawing from a rich archive of legislative documents, contemporary publications, and historical accounts, this study examines the emergence of a multifaceted discourse surrounding sexuality within the context of Italian prisons. Within this framework, the article illuminates the tensions between Mussolini’s authoritarian policies and the pioneering penitentiary practices that were undergoing experimentation in foreign legal systems1.

摘要本文深入探讨了 20 世纪 30 年代意大利监狱史中一个重要但未被充分研究的方面:国际影响与法西斯监狱政策在性问题上的发展之间错综复杂的相互作用。本研究利用丰富的立法文件、当代出版物和历史记载档案,探讨了意大利监狱中围绕性问题出现的多方面论述。在此框架内,文章揭示了墨索里尼的专制政策与外国法律体系中正在进行试验的先锋监狱实践之间的紧张关系1。
{"title":"The issue of sexuality in Italian penitentiary law: a 1930s debate between international influences and fascist prison policies","authors":"Gianmarco Palmieri","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20241211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20241211","url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>This article delves into a crucial yet understudied aspect of Italian penitentiary history during the 1930s: the intricate interplay between international influences and the development of fascist prison policies with regard to issues of sexuality. Drawing from a rich archive of legislative documents, contemporary publications, and historical accounts, this study examines the emergence of a multifaceted discourse surrounding sexuality within the context of Italian prisons. Within this framework, the article illuminates the tensions between Mussolini’s authoritarian policies and the pioneering penitentiary practices that were undergoing experimentation in foreign legal systems<sup>1</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142191218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘Scriptura recepta et usitata’: The impact of the Lex citandi on Justinian’s Digest Scriptura recepta et usitata":Lex citandi》对《查士丁尼文摘》的影响
Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1163/15718190-20241213
W.J. Zwalve

Summary

It is generally taken for granted that the 426 Law of Citations (Lex citandi) of the emperor Valentinian III had no impact on the composition of Justinian’s Digest and that it had already been repealed on 15 December 530 with the promulgation of Const. Deo auctore, announcing the composition of the Digest. In this article it is contended that the Lex citandi was only repealed on 16 December 533, with the promulgation of the Digest on which it had a considerable impact since it was referred to in Const. Deo auctore and was the main inspiration of the Index florentinus, which is to be regarded as an expanded version of the Lex citandi.

摘要 人们普遍认为,瓦伦提尼安三世皇帝颁布的 426 年《引证法》(Lex citandi)对查士丁尼《文摘》的撰写没有影响,而且随着 530 年 12 月 15 日《宪法》的颁布,该法已被废除。Deo auctore,宣布了《文摘》的撰写。这篇文章认为,Lex citandi 是在 533 年 12 月 16 日颁布《文摘》时才被废除的,因为《文摘》在 Const.Deo auctore》中有所提及,并且是《佛罗伦萨索引》的主要灵感来源,而《佛罗伦萨索引》应被视为《Lex citandi》的扩充版。
{"title":"‘Scriptura recepta et usitata’: The impact of the Lex citandi on Justinian’s Digest","authors":"W.J. Zwalve","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20241213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20241213","url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>It is generally taken for granted that the 426 Law of Citations (<em>Lex citandi</em>) of the emperor Valentinian III had no impact on the composition of Justinian’s <em>Digest</em> and that it had already been repealed on 15 December 530 with the promulgation of Const. <em>Deo auctore</em>, announcing the composition of the <em>Digest</em>. In this article it is contended that the <em>Lex citandi</em> was only repealed on 16 December 533, with the promulgation of the <em>Digest</em> on which it had a considerable impact since it was referred to in Const. <em>Deo auctore</em> and was the main inspiration of the <em>Index florentinus</em>, which is to be regarded as an expanded version of the <em>Lex citandi</em>.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142191216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is legal history just writing a text? 法律史就是写文本吗?
Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1163/15718190-20241204
Boudewijn Sirks

Summary

The question, what constitutes the methodology of the legal history research, is answered in different ways. One is that it is the same as for general history: writing on history according to a set of rules which constitute its methodology, because in the end all research on history is just creating a text. It follows from this that legal history is a variation of history and belongs to history faculties, since there is no connection with legal methodology. It is maintained in this article that this view is based on too simple a view of history as science: there is not one methodology but various methodologies (‘discourses’, not only in history but in science in general), each with its own conditions and requirements. Legal history’s discourse has a particular distinguishing element, viz. legal analysis and methodology, which sets it apart from history in general. Its natural place is consequently in law faculties.

摘要对于什么是法律史研究的方法论这一问题,有不同的回答。一种说法是,它与一般历史学相同:根据一套构成其方法论的规则来撰写历史,因为所有的历史研究归根结底都是在创造文本。由此可见,法律史是历史学的一种变体,属于历史系,因为与法律方法论无关。本文认为,这种观点是建立在过于简单地将历史学视为科学的基础之上的:不存在一种方法论,而是存在各种方法论("话语",不仅在历史学中,而且在一般科学中),每种方法论都有其自身的条件和要求。法律史的论述有一个特殊的区分要素,即法律分析和方法论,这使其有别于一般的历史学。因此,它自然而然地属于法学系。
{"title":"Is legal history just writing a text?","authors":"Boudewijn Sirks","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20241204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20241204","url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>The question, what constitutes the methodology of the legal history research, is answered in different ways. One is that it is the same as for general history: writing on history according to a set of rules which constitute its methodology, because in the end all research on history is just creating a text. It follows from this that legal history is a variation of history and belongs to history faculties, since there is no connection with legal methodology. It is maintained in this article that this view is based on too simple a view of history as science: there is not one methodology but various methodologies (‘discourses’, not only in history but in science in general), each with its own conditions and requirements. Legal history’s discourse has a particular distinguishing element, viz. legal analysis and methodology, which sets it apart from history in general. Its natural place is consequently in law faculties.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142191219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Donationem non facit? Donations to people in potestate of the donor in Roman law Donationem non facit?罗马法中对捐赠人的捐赠
Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1163/15718190-20241202
Daniele Curir

Summary

The paper focuses on the phenomenon of donation to people in potestate of the donor. Even though this kind of donation was an old practice in Roman society, classical jurisprudence considered it void due to the lack of legal capacity of the people alieni iuris. However, we can see that beginning from the Severian age, the jurists and then the imperial chancery gradually stated the validity of these acts of liberality, contingent upon certain conditions primarily based on the donor’s voluntas. The analysis of responsa and rescripta related to this subject highlights how this concessio worked under a juridical point of view, along with its progression. Finally, it is highlighted how this interpretatio was part of a broader phenomenon occurring in the 3rd century a.d. and aimed to value the donor’s voluntas.

内容提要 本文主要论述了向捐赠者法定监护人捐赠的现象。尽管这种捐赠在罗马社会是一种古老的习俗,但古典法学认为,由于异族人缺乏法律行为能力,这种捐赠是无效的。然而,我们可以看到,从塞维利亚时代开始,法学家和帝国大法官逐渐声明这些慷慨行为的有效性,但主要以捐赠者的自愿为基础,并取决于某些条件。对与此相关的responsa和rescripta的分析强调了这种特许权是如何从法学角度发挥作用的,以及其发展过程。最后,还强调了这一解释如何成为公元 3 世纪出现的更广泛现象的一部分,并旨在重视捐赠者的自愿。
{"title":"Donationem non facit? Donations to people in potestate of the donor in Roman law","authors":"Daniele Curir","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20241202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20241202","url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>The paper focuses on the phenomenon of donation to people <em>in potestate</em> of the donor. Even though this kind of donation was an old practice in Roman society, classical jurisprudence considered it void due to the lack of legal capacity of the people <em>alieni iuris</em>. However, we can see that beginning from the Severian age, the jurists and then the imperial chancery gradually stated the validity of these acts of liberality, contingent upon certain conditions primarily based on the donor’s <em>voluntas</em>. The analysis of <em>responsa</em> and <em>rescripta</em> related to this subject highlights how this <em>concessio</em> worked under a juridical point of view, along with its progression. Finally, it is highlighted how this <em>interpretatio</em> was part of a broader phenomenon occurring in the 3rd century <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">a.d.</span> and aimed to value the donor’s <em>voluntas</em>.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142191214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Testamentary law in late Medieval Dubrovnik: A case study of the testament of notary Thomasinus de Savere (1284) 中世纪晚期杜布罗夫尼克的遗嘱法:公证人 Thomasinus de Savere 遗嘱(1284 年)案例研究
Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI: 10.1163/15718190-20233411
Henrik-Riko Held

Summary

This paper explores testamentary law in late medieval Dubrovnik (Ragusa) by analysing the testaments made by notary Thomasinus de Savere, working at Dubrovnik, 1277–1286. De Savere was an educated notary, originating from Reggio Emilia in Italy. He greatly contributed to the spread of doctrinal elements of ius commune in Dubrovnik. In determining the reach of his influence on testamentary law, I will first examine inheritance law in Dubrovnik at the time, followed by an analysis of the testaments De Savere composed for the local population. I will then compare these testaments with the testament De Savere made for himself (1284). The latter differs from the testaments composed for the locals, as it is doctrinally in line with the latest developments of the ius commune. I will discuss the possible reasons and relevance of this difference.

摘要本文通过分析 1277-1286 年在杜布罗夫尼克工作的公证人 Thomasinus de Savere 所做的遗嘱,探讨了中世纪晚期杜布罗夫尼克(拉古萨)的遗嘱法。De Savere 是一位受过良好教育的公证人,来自意大利的雷焦艾米利亚。他为 ius commune 理论要素在杜布罗夫尼克的传播做出了巨大贡献。在确定他对遗嘱法的影响范围时,我将首先研究当时杜布罗夫尼克的继承法,然后分析 De Savere 为当地人撰写的遗嘱。然后,我将把这些遗嘱与德萨韦尔为自己撰写的遗嘱(1284 年)进行比较。后者不同于为当地人撰写的遗书,因为它在教义上符合公社法的最新发展。我将讨论这种差异的可能原因和相关性。
{"title":"Testamentary law in late Medieval Dubrovnik: A case study of the testament of notary Thomasinus de Savere (1284)","authors":"Henrik-Riko Held","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20233411","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20233411","url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>This paper explores testamentary law in late medieval Dubrovnik (Ragusa) by analysing the testaments made by notary Thomasinus de Savere, working at Dubrovnik, 1277–1286. De Savere was an educated notary, originating from Reggio Emilia in Italy. He greatly contributed to the spread of doctrinal elements of <em>ius commune</em> in Dubrovnik. In determining the reach of his influence on testamentary law, I will first examine inheritance law in Dubrovnik at the time, followed by an analysis of the testaments De Savere composed for the local population. I will then compare these testaments with the testament De Savere made for himself (1284). The latter differs from the testaments composed for the locals, as it is doctrinally in line with the latest developments of the <em>ius commune.</em> I will discuss the possible reasons and relevance of this difference.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139051113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Testamentary practices and village courts in the Bailiwick of ’s-Hertogenbosch (c. 1470-1550) 塞尔托亨博斯辖区的遗嘱做法和乡村法庭(约 1470-1550 年)
Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI: 10.1163/15718190-20233409
Mark Vermeer

Summary

This paper discusses the origin, function and uses of schepentestamenten, acts of last will registered before municipal courts of aldermen. From the second half of the fifteenth century, peasants and townsmen found recourse to these courts for the registration of acts of last will. At first these acts were primarily contracts among spouses mutually conveying to each other the property upon death, but especially after the secularisation of the notarial profession in 1531 the number of pious bequests and religious beneficiaries greatly increased. In general, three strategies prevail in the employment of the last will: overruling the customary dispensation to the surviving spouse and providing this person with additional resources, specifying the position of each of the children (especially when some were illegitimate or had received by life), and preventing loss of wealth from the family. For the legal instruments, the aldermen resorted to their standard formulary, although attuned to the peculiarities of the last will. The trust and authority the courts of aldermen enjoyed, in combination with their executive clout in enforcing compliance, allowed them to discard various formal elements required in notarial instruments, while also making them popular institutions for the registration of last wills.

摘要本文讨论了在市镇市政官法院登记的遗愿文书(schepentestamenten)的起源、功能和用途。从十五世纪下半叶起,农民和城镇居民就开始求助于这些法院登记遗愿。起初,这些遗嘱主要是配偶之间相互转让死亡后财产的契约,但特别是在 1531 年公证行业世俗化之后,虔诚遗赠和宗教受益人的数量大大增加。一般来说,遗嘱的使用主要有三种策略:推翻对未亡配偶的习惯性分配,并为其提供额外的资源;明确规定每个子女的地位(尤其是当有些子女是私生子或终身受益时);以及防止家庭财富的流失。在法律文书方面,市议员们采用的是他们的标准格式,但也考虑到了最后遗嘱的特殊性。市议员法院享有的信任和权威,再加上他们在强制执行方面的行政影响力,使他们能够摒弃公证文书中所要求的各种形式要素,同时也使他们成为登记遗愿的受欢迎机构。
{"title":"Testamentary practices and village courts in the Bailiwick of ’s-Hertogenbosch (c. 1470-1550)","authors":"Mark Vermeer","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20233409","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20233409","url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>This paper discusses the origin, function and uses of <em>schepentestamenten</em>, acts of last will registered before municipal courts of aldermen. From the second half of the fifteenth century, peasants and townsmen found recourse to these courts for the registration of acts of last will. At first these acts were primarily contracts among spouses mutually conveying to each other the property upon death, but especially after the secularisation of the notarial profession in 1531 the number of pious bequests and religious beneficiaries greatly increased. In general, three strategies prevail in the employment of the last will: overruling the customary dispensation to the surviving spouse and providing this person with additional resources, specifying the position of each of the children (especially when some were illegitimate or had received by life), and preventing loss of wealth from the family. For the legal instruments, the aldermen resorted to their standard formulary, although attuned to the peculiarities of the last will. The trust and authority the courts of aldermen enjoyed, in combination with their executive clout in enforcing compliance, allowed them to discard various formal elements required in notarial instruments, while also making them popular institutions for the registration of last wills.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139051283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Zur Entmündigung wegen Wahnsinn und Verschwendung im römischen Recht 罗马法中因疯狂和浪费而丧失行为能力的规定
Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI: 10.1163/15718190-20233405
Christine Lehne-Gstreinthaler

Summary

This article is devoted to the incapacitation procedure for insane and profligate persons in Roman law. On the basis of literary and legal sources, an attempt is made to explain the incapacitation procedure in more detail. Special attention is given to the concept of interdiction and the question of involvement of physicians in such proceedings.

内容提要 本文专门论述罗马法中对精神失常者和挥霍无度者的剥夺行为能力程序。在文学和法律资料的基础上,试图更详细地解释丧失行为能力的程序。本文特别关注禁治产的概念以及医生参与此类程序的问题。
{"title":"Zur Entmündigung wegen Wahnsinn und Verschwendung im römischen Recht","authors":"Christine Lehne-Gstreinthaler","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20233405","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20233405","url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>This article is devoted to the incapacitation procedure for insane and profligate persons in Roman law. On the basis of literary and legal sources, an attempt is made to explain the incapacitation procedure in more detail. Special attention is given to the concept of interdiction and the question of involvement of physicians in such proceedings.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139051124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
L’élaboration d’une normativité en droit des gens: le recours au discours historique dans le De legationibus d’Alberico Gentili 万国法规范性的发展:Alberico Gentili 的《De legationibus》中历史话语的运用
Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI: 10.1163/15718190-20233407
Emilie Colpaint

Summary

The development of normativity in international law: the use of historical discourse in Alberico Gentili’s De legationibus. – The aim of this article is to examine the sources used and the method employed by Alberico Gentili in his De legationibus, to elaborate a norm for the law of embassies. Although legal sources feature prominently in this treatise, the majority of them are derived from a variety of sources from Antiquity (historians, philosophers, rhetors, poets, etc.). Alberico Gentili mainly uses historical sources, and more specifically the exemplum, in his treatise. By mobilizing historical exempla alongside legal sources, the jurist created a rational normative system capable of responding to the diplomatic challenges of the sixteenth century brought about by constantly evolving practice.

摘要国际法规范性的发展:阿贝里科-让蒂利在《De legationibus》中对历史论述的运用。- 本文旨在研究 Alberico Gentili 在其 De legationibus 中阐述使馆法规范时所使用的资料来源和方法。虽然法律渊源在这篇论文中占有重要地位,但其中大部分渊源来自古代的各种资料(历史学家、哲学家、修辞学家、诗人等)。Alberico Gentili 在其论文中主要使用历史资料,更具体地说是范例。通过调动历史典范和法律渊源,这位法学家创建了一个合理的规范体系,能够应对十六世纪不断演变的实践所带来的外交挑战。
{"title":"L’élaboration d’une normativité en droit des gens: le recours au discours historique dans le De legationibus d’Alberico Gentili","authors":"Emilie Colpaint","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20233407","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20233407","url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p><em>The development of normativity in international law: the use of historical discourse in Alberico Gentili’s</em> De legationibus. – The aim of this article is to examine the sources used and the method employed by Alberico Gentili in his <em>De legationibus</em>, to elaborate a norm for the law of embassies. Although legal sources feature prominently in this treatise, the majority of them are derived from a variety of sources from Antiquity (historians, philosophers, rhetors, poets, etc.). Alberico Gentili mainly uses historical sources, and more specifically the <em>exemplum</em>, in his treatise. By mobilizing historical <em>exempla</em> alongside legal sources, the jurist created a rational normative system capable of responding to the diplomatic challenges of the sixteenth century brought about by constantly evolving practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139054088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The Legal History Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1