Overcoming organizational constraints: The role of organizational commitment and job crafting in relation to employee performance

IF 7.3 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS European Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-25 DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2023.12.001
Dariusz Turek , Howard J. Klein , Agnieszka Wojtczuk-Turek
{"title":"Overcoming organizational constraints: The role of organizational commitment and job crafting in relation to employee performance","authors":"Dariusz Turek ,&nbsp;Howard J. Klein ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Wojtczuk-Turek","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Organizational constraints have been shown to impact numerous work outcomes negatively. However, we still know little about the mechanisms by which organizational constraints affect employee performance or the conditions under which performance is or is not reduced. Drawing on the job demands–resources theory, we propose a mediated-moderation model that advances our understanding of the effects of organizational constraints on employee performance. We hypothesize that organizational constraints decrease organizational commitment, resulting in employees being less willing to be proactive (job crafting), which in turn leads to lower job performance. However, we further hypothesize that the amount of crafting in the face of organizational constraints depends on commitment, with more committed employees (despite constraints due to counterbalancing factors) engaging in more job crafting than those with low commitment. As a result of high commitment and job crafting, employee performance can actually be higher. Data collected from 746 Polish employees revealed that organizational constraints were directly and negatively related to employee performance. However, this negative relationship is mediated through organizational commitment and job crafting, and further moderated by organizational commitment as predicted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":"42 6","pages":"Pages 944-956"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323001445","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizational constraints have been shown to impact numerous work outcomes negatively. However, we still know little about the mechanisms by which organizational constraints affect employee performance or the conditions under which performance is or is not reduced. Drawing on the job demands–resources theory, we propose a mediated-moderation model that advances our understanding of the effects of organizational constraints on employee performance. We hypothesize that organizational constraints decrease organizational commitment, resulting in employees being less willing to be proactive (job crafting), which in turn leads to lower job performance. However, we further hypothesize that the amount of crafting in the face of organizational constraints depends on commitment, with more committed employees (despite constraints due to counterbalancing factors) engaging in more job crafting than those with low commitment. As a result of high commitment and job crafting, employee performance can actually be higher. Data collected from 746 Polish employees revealed that organizational constraints were directly and negatively related to employee performance. However, this negative relationship is mediated through organizational commitment and job crafting, and further moderated by organizational commitment as predicted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克服组织限制:组织承诺和工作雕琢对员工绩效的作用
事实证明,组织约束会对许多工作成果产生负面影响。然而,我们对组织约束影响员工绩效的机制或绩效降低或不降低的条件仍然知之甚少。借鉴工作需求-资源理论,我们提出了一个中介-调节模型,以加深我们对组织约束对员工绩效影响的理解。我们假设,组织约束会降低组织承诺,导致员工不愿意积极主动地工作(工作雕琢),进而降低工作绩效。然而,我们进一步假设,面对组织约束时的工作雕琢程度取决于承诺,承诺度高的员工(尽管由于平衡因素而受到约束)会比承诺度低的员工进行更多的工作雕琢。高承诺和工作精心设计的结果是,员工的绩效实际上会更高。从 746 名波兰员工那里收集的数据显示,组织约束与员工绩效直接负相关。然而,这种负相关关系通过组织承诺和工作设计进行中介,并如预测的那样被组织承诺进一步调节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Behavioral analysis of ChatGPT users based on the ABC model: Focusing on a socio-technical approach The new normal of corporate sustainability: A post-pandemic perspective on greenwashing discourse and manager perceptions The benefits of an enabling managerial control style in a teleworking situation. A latent profile analysis Coopetition in practice: Managerial practices for navigating cooperation with competitors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1