A modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.5114/wiitm.2023.133777
Sheng Xu, Jingya Nie, Wenjie Zeng, Yucheng Lai, Xiaoyan Chen, Yan Yu
{"title":"A modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Sheng Xu, Jingya Nie, Wenjie Zeng, Yucheng Lai, Xiaoyan Chen, Yan Yu","doi":"10.5114/wiitm.2023.133777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction</b><br/>Pelvic organ prolapse (POP), a common and benign condition, is characterized by the descent of one or more aspects of the vagina and uterus. A wide variety of mesh-based surgical techniques have been proved to be effective in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).<br/><br/><b>Aim</b><br/>To evaluate the efficacy of a modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh (mLLSM) in patients with apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods</b><br/>All patients diagnosed with apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse underwent a modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh (mLLSM). Perioperative parameters including surgical time, blood loss and complications were recorded. At the minimal 12-month follow-up, primary outcome measures included both anatomical and functional points. The anatomical cure rate was evaluated using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Questionnaire (POP-Q) assessment. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using questionnaires.<br/><br/><b>Results</b><br/>Mean surgical time was 91.56 ±15.33 min; mean estimated blood loss was 55.42 ±36.73 ml; no intraoperative complications were noted in the perioperative period. After a minimal 12-month follow-up period, rates of anatomical success and subjective satisfaction were 96.33% and 94.50%, respectively. Symptom severity and quality of life also improved significantly.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions</b><br/>We found mLLSM to be a safe and effective treatment for patients suffering apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse. We found mLLSM to result in excellent outcomes and fewer mesh complications, underscoring its potential as an alternative treatment option for the management of apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.133777","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP), a common and benign condition, is characterized by the descent of one or more aspects of the vagina and uterus. A wide variety of mesh-based surgical techniques have been proved to be effective in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Aim
To evaluate the efficacy of a modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh (mLLSM) in patients with apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse.

Material and methods
All patients diagnosed with apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse underwent a modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh (mLLSM). Perioperative parameters including surgical time, blood loss and complications were recorded. At the minimal 12-month follow-up, primary outcome measures included both anatomical and functional points. The anatomical cure rate was evaluated using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Questionnaire (POP-Q) assessment. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using questionnaires.

Results
Mean surgical time was 91.56 ±15.33 min; mean estimated blood loss was 55.42 ±36.73 ml; no intraoperative complications were noted in the perioperative period. After a minimal 12-month follow-up period, rates of anatomical success and subjective satisfaction were 96.33% and 94.50%, respectively. Symptom severity and quality of life also improved significantly.

Conclusions
We found mLLSM to be a safe and effective treatment for patients suffering apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse. We found mLLSM to result in excellent outcomes and fewer mesh complications, underscoring its potential as an alternative treatment option for the management of apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良腹腔镜侧悬吊术与网片治疗盆腔顶端和前部器官脱垂:一项回顾性队列研究
简介:盆腔器官脱垂(POP)是一种常见的良性疾病,其特征是阴道和子宫的一个或多个部位下垂。材料和方法所有确诊为盆腔器官顶端和前部脱垂的患者均接受了改良腹腔镜下网片侧悬吊术(mLLSM)。记录围手术期参数,包括手术时间、失血量和并发症。在最短12个月的随访中,主要结果指标包括解剖和功能两方面。解剖学治愈率通过盆腔器官脱垂问卷(POP-Q)评估进行评价。结果 平均手术时间为(91.56 ± 15.33)分钟;估计平均失血量为(55.42 ± 36.73)毫升;围手术期未发现术中并发症。经过最短 12 个月的随访,解剖成功率和主观满意度分别为 96.33% 和 94.50%。结论我们发现 mLLSM 是一种安全有效的治疗方法,适用于患有顶端和前方盆腔器官脱垂的患者。我们发现 mLLSM 的疗效极佳,网片并发症较少,突出了其作为治疗顶端和前方盆腔器官脱垂的替代疗法的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
期刊最新文献
Early-stage voiding function following uni- versus bilateral inferior vesical vessel resection during therapeutic lateral lymph node dissection with autonomic nerve sparing for advanced low rectal cancer (with video) Effect and prognosis of endoscopic intracranial hematoma removal and hematoma puncture and drainage in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for pulmonary metastasis: who benefits the most? Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and safety of transanal endoscopic microsurgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal tumors Clinical comparative study of laparoscopic partial splenectomy and open partial splenectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1