Multiple dimensions of phylogenetic diversity are needed to explain the complex aboveground–belowground diversity relationships

IF 3.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Oikos Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI:10.1111/oik.10474
Xiaorong Lu, Marc W. Cadotte, Pandeng Wang, Shan Rao, Xiaoye Shi, Siyuan Ren, Xihua Wang, Shao-peng Li
{"title":"Multiple dimensions of phylogenetic diversity are needed to explain the complex aboveground–belowground diversity relationships","authors":"Xiaorong Lu, Marc W. Cadotte, Pandeng Wang, Shan Rao, Xiaoye Shi, Siyuan Ren, Xihua Wang, Shao-peng Li","doi":"10.1111/oik.10474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complex relationship between aboveground and belowground diversity and whether they act as surrogates for one another remains unresolved. Increasing evidence suggests that investigating phylogenetic diversity could provide valuable insights into the interplay between plants and soil microbes, but the proliferation of phylogenetic diversity metrics has hindered comparative studies and the identification of general patterns. To overcome this challenge, we implemented a multi-dimensional framework that classifies phylogenetic diversity metrics into three dimensions: richness, divergence, and regularity, each of which captures different ecological aspects of species differences. Then we applied this framework to investigate the relationship between above and belowground diversity in a subtropical forest in eastern China. We found that phylogenetic diversity of plant and soil microbes, including bacteria and fungi, were more strongly correlated at the richness and regularity dimensions compared with divergence dimension. Further analyses revealed that these observed correlation patterns align with variations in soil total phosphorus content, a key factor influencing both plant and microbial phylogenetic diversity at richness and regularity dimensions. Together, our study demonstrated the necessity of using a multi-dimensional approach to advance our understanding of the complex relationships between plant and soil microbial biodiversity.","PeriodicalId":19496,"journal":{"name":"Oikos","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oikos","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.10474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The complex relationship between aboveground and belowground diversity and whether they act as surrogates for one another remains unresolved. Increasing evidence suggests that investigating phylogenetic diversity could provide valuable insights into the interplay between plants and soil microbes, but the proliferation of phylogenetic diversity metrics has hindered comparative studies and the identification of general patterns. To overcome this challenge, we implemented a multi-dimensional framework that classifies phylogenetic diversity metrics into three dimensions: richness, divergence, and regularity, each of which captures different ecological aspects of species differences. Then we applied this framework to investigate the relationship between above and belowground diversity in a subtropical forest in eastern China. We found that phylogenetic diversity of plant and soil microbes, including bacteria and fungi, were more strongly correlated at the richness and regularity dimensions compared with divergence dimension. Further analyses revealed that these observed correlation patterns align with variations in soil total phosphorus content, a key factor influencing both plant and microbial phylogenetic diversity at richness and regularity dimensions. Together, our study demonstrated the necessity of using a multi-dimensional approach to advance our understanding of the complex relationships between plant and soil microbial biodiversity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
要解释复杂的地上地下多样性关系,需要系统发育多样性的多个维度
地上和地下多样性之间的复杂关系以及它们是否相互替代的问题仍未得到解决。越来越多的证据表明,研究系统发育多样性可以为植物与土壤微生物之间的相互作用提供有价值的见解,但系统发育多样性指标的激增阻碍了比较研究和一般模式的识别。为了克服这一难题,我们采用了一个多维框架,将系统发育多样性指标分为三个维度:丰富度、分化度和规则度,每个维度都能捕捉物种差异的不同生态方面。然后,我们运用这一框架研究了中国东部亚热带森林地上和地下多样性之间的关系。我们发现,植物和土壤微生物(包括细菌和真菌)的系统发育多样性在丰富度和规整度维度上的相关性比分歧维度更强。进一步的分析表明,这些观察到的相关模式与土壤总磷含量的变化一致,而土壤总磷含量是影响植物和微生物系统发育多样性在丰富度和规则度维度上的关键因素。总之,我们的研究表明,有必要使用多维方法来加深我们对植物和土壤微生物生物多样性之间复杂关系的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oikos
Oikos 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
152
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Oikos publishes original and innovative research on all aspects of ecology, defined as organism-environment interactions at various spatiotemporal scales, so including macroecology and evolutionary ecology. Emphasis is on theoretical and empirical work aimed at generalization and synthesis across taxa, systems and ecological disciplines. Papers can contribute to new developments in ecology by reporting novel theory or critical empirical results, and "synthesis" can include developing new theory, tests of general hypotheses, or bringing together established or emerging areas of ecology. Confirming or extending the established literature, by for example showing results that are novel for a new taxon, or purely applied research, is given low priority.
期刊最新文献
Linking fine‐root diameter across root orders with climatic, biological and edaphic factors in the Northern Hemisphere Do plants respond to multi‐year disturbance rhythms and are we missing the beat? Importance of accounting for imperfect detection of plants in the estimation of population growth rates Landscape structures and stand attributes jointly regulate forest productivity Evolutionary cycles in a model of nestmate recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1