Why does the schooling gap close while the wage gap persists across country income comparisons?

IF 1.9 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jedc.2023.104805
Pantelis Karapanagiotis , Paul Reimers
{"title":"Why does the schooling gap close while the wage gap persists across country income comparisons?","authors":"Pantelis Karapanagiotis ,&nbsp;Paul Reimers","doi":"10.1016/j.jedc.2023.104805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The schooling gap diminishes because the services sector becomes more pronounced for high-income countries, and the paid hours gap closes. Although gender wage inequality persists across country income groups, differences in schooling years between females and males diminish. We assemble a novel dataset, calibrate a general equilibrium, multi-sector, -gender, and -production technology model, and show that gender-specific sectoral comparative advantages explain the paid hours and schooling gap decline from low- to high-income economies even when the wage gap persists. Additionally, our counterfactual analyses indicate that consumption subsistence and production share heterogeneity across both income groups and genders are essential to explain the co-decline of the schooling and paid hours gaps. Our results highlight effective mechanisms for policies aiming to reduce gender inequality in schooling and suggest that the schooling gap decline and the de-invisibilization of female paid work observed in high-income countries are linked by structural sector movements instead of wage inequality reductions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188923002117/pdfft?md5=766a593cdfd545b0c2b254c0e02d3908&pid=1-s2.0-S0165188923002117-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188923002117","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The schooling gap diminishes because the services sector becomes more pronounced for high-income countries, and the paid hours gap closes. Although gender wage inequality persists across country income groups, differences in schooling years between females and males diminish. We assemble a novel dataset, calibrate a general equilibrium, multi-sector, -gender, and -production technology model, and show that gender-specific sectoral comparative advantages explain the paid hours and schooling gap decline from low- to high-income economies even when the wage gap persists. Additionally, our counterfactual analyses indicate that consumption subsistence and production share heterogeneity across both income groups and genders are essential to explain the co-decline of the schooling and paid hours gaps. Our results highlight effective mechanisms for policies aiming to reduce gender inequality in schooling and suggest that the schooling gap decline and the de-invisibilization of female paid work observed in high-income countries are linked by structural sector movements instead of wage inequality reductions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么在各国收入比较中,就学差距缩小,而工资差距却持续存在?
由于高收入国家的服务业更加突出,就学差距缩小,有偿工时差距缩小。尽管在不同国家收入组别中,男女工资不平等现象依然存在,但男女之间的受教育年限差距却在缩小。我们收集了一个新颖的数据集,校准了一个多部门、多性别和生产技术的一般均衡模型,并表明即使在工资差距持续存在的情况下,特定性别部门的比较优势也能解释从低收入经济体到高收入经济体的带薪工时和受教育年限差距的缩小。此外,我们的反事实分析表明,收入群体和性别间的消费自给性和生产份额异质性对于解释就学和带薪工时差距的共同下降至关重要。我们的研究结果凸显了旨在减少学校教育中性别不平等的政策的有效机制,并表明在高收入国家观察到的学校教育差距的缩小和女性有偿工作的非虚拟化是由结构部门的变动而不是工资不平等的减少联系在一起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: The journal provides an outlet for publication of research concerning all theoretical and empirical aspects of economic dynamics and control as well as the development and use of computational methods in economics and finance. Contributions regarding computational methods may include, but are not restricted to, artificial intelligence, databases, decision support systems, genetic algorithms, modelling languages, neural networks, numerical algorithms for optimization, control and equilibria, parallel computing and qualitative reasoning.
期刊最新文献
Closed-form approximations of moments and densities of continuous–time Markov models Capital misallocation and economic development in a dynamic open economy Commodity prices and production networks in small open economies How do households respond to income shocks? Unconventional policies in state-dependent liquidity traps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1