The place of the Great Mosque of Tlemcen: the paradox between patrimonialisation and appropriation

Q1 Arts and Humanities Built Heritage Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.1186/s43238-023-00109-w
Mohammed Chihab Selka, Imene Selka Oussadit
{"title":"The place of the Great Mosque of Tlemcen: the paradox between patrimonialisation and appropriation","authors":"Mohammed Chihab Selka, Imene Selka Oussadit","doi":"10.1186/s43238-023-00109-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Great Mosque of Tlemcen is a unique case, as it is one of the few mosques dating back to the Almoravid period that is almost intact. It has evolved in a constantly changing space and now has a conjoined public square, following an occidental configuration, which is quite rare. The size of this square suggests that it could be put to use as an additional vector for the valorisation of the mosque, but the current situation is different. This added space, introduced by occidental culture, creates a dual architectural language with several other buildings that mark all the layers of evolution in the urban fabric. Apart from its religious function, this mosque used to play the role of a covered public square, a role that has eroded over time. The aim of this research is to analyse the relationship between the building and its surroundings, as well as the population’s perception of this relationship. Additionally, the research is intended to highlight changes in the perception of the Great Mosque of Tlemcen’s public square over time, depending on historical, political, and social contexts. This research relies on an approach that combines different methods, including a thorough analysis of historical, cartographic, and legislative documents. Through this approach, we were able to conduct a comparative analysis with other similar cases. Finally, field research allowed us to understand the relationship between space and society. Despite the legal recognition of the surroundings as a historical monument, this status is not widely perceived and integrated into the population’s sense of heritage space. This is reflected in private and even public actions, despite the instrumentalisation of this heritage status, with appropriations of protected space that occur outside of regulations and become part of the landscape expression of the building in its environment.","PeriodicalId":33925,"journal":{"name":"Built Heritage","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-023-00109-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Great Mosque of Tlemcen is a unique case, as it is one of the few mosques dating back to the Almoravid period that is almost intact. It has evolved in a constantly changing space and now has a conjoined public square, following an occidental configuration, which is quite rare. The size of this square suggests that it could be put to use as an additional vector for the valorisation of the mosque, but the current situation is different. This added space, introduced by occidental culture, creates a dual architectural language with several other buildings that mark all the layers of evolution in the urban fabric. Apart from its religious function, this mosque used to play the role of a covered public square, a role that has eroded over time. The aim of this research is to analyse the relationship between the building and its surroundings, as well as the population’s perception of this relationship. Additionally, the research is intended to highlight changes in the perception of the Great Mosque of Tlemcen’s public square over time, depending on historical, political, and social contexts. This research relies on an approach that combines different methods, including a thorough analysis of historical, cartographic, and legislative documents. Through this approach, we were able to conduct a comparative analysis with other similar cases. Finally, field research allowed us to understand the relationship between space and society. Despite the legal recognition of the surroundings as a historical monument, this status is not widely perceived and integrated into the population’s sense of heritage space. This is reflected in private and even public actions, despite the instrumentalisation of this heritage status, with appropriations of protected space that occur outside of regulations and become part of the landscape expression of the building in its environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特莱姆森大清真寺的位置:遗产化与占有之间的矛盾
特莱姆森大清真寺是一个独特的例子,因为它是为数不多的几座可追溯到阿尔莫拉维时期的清真寺之一,几乎保存完好。清真寺在不断变化的空间中发展,现在有一个连体公共广场,采用西式布局,这是非常罕见的。从广场的面积来看,它可以作为清真寺价值提升的额外载体,但目前的情况却并非如此。由西方文化引入的这一新增空间与其他几座建筑形成了双重建筑语言,标志着城市结构的所有演变层次。除宗教功能外,这座清真寺还曾扮演过有顶广场的角色,但随着时间的推移,这一角色已逐渐消失。这项研究的目的是分析这座建筑与其周围环境之间的关系,以及人们对这种关系的看法。此外,这项研究还旨在强调随着时间的推移,人们对特莱姆森大清真寺公共广场的看法会随着历史、政治和社会背景的变化而变化。这项研究采用了一种结合不同方法的方法,包括对历史、地图和立法文件的全面分析。通过这种方法,我们能够与其他类似案例进行比较分析。最后,实地研究使我们得以了解空间与社会之间的关系。尽管周围环境在法律上被认定为历史古迹,但这一地位并没有被广泛认知,也没有融入民众对遗产空间的认识中。这一点反映在私人甚至公共行动中,尽管这种遗产地位被工具化了,但对受保护空间的占用发生在法规之外,成为建筑在其环境中的景观表达的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Built Heritage
Built Heritage Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Heritage, urban form and spatial resignification in the production of sustainable Olympic legacies: an urban design analysis of the Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games Industrial heritage in the hosting of mega-events: assessing the potential for urban redevelopment and social change? Evolving heritage in modern China: transforming religious sites for preservation and development The sound heritage of Kotagede: the evolving soundscape of a living museum The politics of heritage in a river-city: imperial, hyper-colonial, and globalising Tianjin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1