Pub Date : 2024-09-18DOI: 10.1186/s43238-024-00159-8
Renata Latuf de Oliveira Sanchez
The Olympic Games have been associated with many urban transformation projects throughout their history, often focusing on city expansion. Recent sustainability concerns, however, constitute a pressing challenge, with the regeneration of central areas fulfilling a key role in existing urban agendas. In this paper, the legacy of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games at two proposed centralities was analysed, namely, the Olympic Park, intended as a future neighbourhood to the west of the city, and Porto Maravilha (PM), an urban project aimed at revitalizing a central, historical area of the city. By comparing the Olympic Park and the first provided areas in PM, in terms of selecting urban design criteria through qualitative in loco assessments, this paper focused on analysing the impacts of urban forms and heritage on the consolidation of these two centralities, as well as encouraging social interaction and integration into the city. The analysis results indicated that urban design attributes such as human-scaled, mixed-use, context-based urban spaces could interfere with social interaction and the usability of spaces. Moreover, the repurposing of heritage buildings contributed to urban cohesion for legacy transformation. Hence, novel insights into urban design and heritage could become important for future editions of the Olympics so that host cities may fulfil their sustainability agendas.
{"title":"Heritage, urban form and spatial resignification in the production of sustainable Olympic legacies: an urban design analysis of the Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games","authors":"Renata Latuf de Oliveira Sanchez","doi":"10.1186/s43238-024-00159-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00159-8","url":null,"abstract":"The Olympic Games have been associated with many urban transformation projects throughout their history, often focusing on city expansion. Recent sustainability concerns, however, constitute a pressing challenge, with the regeneration of central areas fulfilling a key role in existing urban agendas. In this paper, the legacy of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games at two proposed centralities was analysed, namely, the Olympic Park, intended as a future neighbourhood to the west of the city, and Porto Maravilha (PM), an urban project aimed at revitalizing a central, historical area of the city. By comparing the Olympic Park and the first provided areas in PM, in terms of selecting urban design criteria through qualitative in loco assessments, this paper focused on analysing the impacts of urban forms and heritage on the consolidation of these two centralities, as well as encouraging social interaction and integration into the city. The analysis results indicated that urban design attributes such as human-scaled, mixed-use, context-based urban spaces could interfere with social interaction and the usability of spaces. Moreover, the repurposing of heritage buildings contributed to urban cohesion for legacy transformation. Hence, novel insights into urban design and heritage could become important for future editions of the Olympics so that host cities may fulfil their sustainability agendas.","PeriodicalId":33925,"journal":{"name":"Built Heritage","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142251022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1186/s43238-024-00157-w
Florence Graezer Bideau, Anne-Marie Broudehoux
<p>Mega-events, whether sporting (Olympics, World Cup, etc.) or cultural (Exhibitions), are unique moments to study urban dynamics, especially with regard to image and identity construction (Andranovich et al. 2001; Smith 2012; Gold and Gold 2016). For cities and nations alike, mega-events represent unique opportunities to showcase the best of what they have to offer, hoping to bolster tourism and attract inward foreign investment (Grix and Lee 2013; Hayes and Karamichas 2012; Müller and Gaffney 2018). They are important drivers of the urban intervention meant to build a favourable place-image and yield positive economic returns.</p><p>Over the last few decades, critical studies have highlighted how mega-events downplay, or actively invisibilise, their negative impacts on urban dynamics, in terms of growing economic inequality, social polarisation, politics of exclusion, and resident’s dispossession, leading to multiple forms of mega-events’ resistance and opposition (Gruneau and Horne 2015; Sanchez and Broudehoux 2013). Some scholars (Pillay and Bass 2008) have described the resulting material and immaterial transformations in terms of social engineering, while others talk of sustainability and inclusive development goals (Broudehoux 2017; Stanton 2005, 2019). While mega-events are not the only factors influencing local change, they do exacerbate existing trends and, as such, act as a magnifying glass to reveal with clear clarity the interests and values of local decision-makers, especially in terms of heritage preservation.</p><p>Heritage plays a major part in destination branding and attractiveness. Processes and negotiations among individual and institutional actors to identify, acknowledge, and convey a property’s heritage designation are paramount, as they pertain to meanings associated with memory, identity, and space (Carter et al. 2020). In particular, built heritage is an essential element of the urban landscape, a material bearer of values and meaning. It can be a major asset, as an element of cultural offer that can attest to the city’s historical rootedness and level of cultural sophistication. It can also act as a testimony to its trustworthiness as a safe location for investment and tourism.</p><p>Local states increasingly mobilise industrial heritage sites to host mega-events as a strategy to promote urban development, place branding, and societal change (Theurillat and Graezer Bideau 2022). Led by public-private coalitions of interest that remain faithful to the urban entrepreneurialism governance strategies described by Harvey a few decades ago (Harvey 1989), these endeavours impact both infrastructure and landmark development, as well as ecological and social environments. The paper by Graezer Bideau, Deng and Roux compares dominant discourses surrounding the reuse of industrial heritage in the context of mega-events. Specifically, it analyses the Shanghai 2010 World Expo and the London 2012 Summer Olympic Games. Meanwhile, Zha
劳动：美洲工人阶级史研究》16 (1)：151-170.Article Google Scholar Theurillat, Thierry, and Florence Graezer Bideau.2022.金融化生态文明背景下'消费城市'驱动的中国扩展型城市化.Transactions in Planning and Urban Research 1 (1-2)：17-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/27541223221101720.Article Google Scholar Wicke, Christian, Stephan Berger, and Jana Golombek, eds. 2018.工业遗产与地区身份。伦敦：Google Scholar 下载参考文献作者感谢 Plácido Gonzáles Martínez 对本特刊的协调、期刊编辑团队以及匿名审稿人的宝贵意见。本项目的数据收集资金来自加拿大社会科学与人文研究理事会的洞察力基金。作者及所属机构College of Humanities, Digital Humanities Institute, Heritage, Anthropology and Technologies Research Group, EPFL, CM 2 270 - Station 10, Lausanne, 1015, SwitzerlandFlorence Graezer BideauSchool of Design, University of Quebec at Montreal, C.P. 8888, succ.Centre-ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3P8, CanadaAnne-Marie Broudehoux作者简介Florence Graezer Bideau查看作者发表的论文您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者Anne-Marie Broudehoux查看作者发表的论文您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者供稿Florence Graezer Bideau和Anne-Marie Broudehoux为共同作者。作者信息弗洛伦斯-格雷泽-比多（Florence Graezer Bideau）是瑞士洛桑联邦理工学院（EPFL）人文学院的高级科学家和高级讲师，自 2009 年起受聘于该学院。她领导遗产、人类学与技术研究小组（前身为遗产、文化与城市），重点研究社会行动者在遗产制作中的作用。她在巴黎高等社会科学研究学院（EHESS）获得历史与文明博士学位。2015 年至 2022 年间，她还在意大利都灵理工大学建筑与设计系担任客座教授。在批判性遗产研究领域，她的工作通过比较视角深入研究文化与权力之间复杂的相互作用。她的研究调查了文化政策、遗产管理和治理、抵制的动力以及城市和领土发展，从自上而下和自下而上的角度研究这些问题。她出版过多部著作，发表过多篇文章，内容涉及城市人类学与遗产相关的跨学科项目，包括北京 2008 年奥运会后、联合国教科文组织世界遗产地或非物质文化遗产。她与人合编的著作《Porter le temps.Mémoires urbaines d'un site horloger》（MētisPresses）一书于 2022 年获得国际规划史学会颁发的 Koos Bosma 奖。自 2020 年以来，她一直领导着国家社会科学基金项目 "2022 年北京冬奥会文化遗产的利用"。安妮-玛丽-布劳德胡克（Anne-Marie Broudehoux）是蒙特利尔魁北克大学（UQAM）设计学院的全职教授，自 2002 年起一直受聘于该学院。她担任现代建筑遗产研究生课程主任。她从加州大学伯克利分校获得建筑学博士学位。她的主要研究方向是城市形象建设的政治经济学，尤其是在新兴经济体举办大型活动的背景下。她出版过多部著作，发表过多篇文章，内容涉及 2008 年北京奥运会和 2016 年里约热内卢奥运会之前的社会空间变革。她在 2004 年出版的著作《后毛泽东时代北京的制造与销售》（The Making and Selling of Post-Mao Beijing，Routledge 出版社）于 2006 年获得国际规划史学会图书奖。自2017年起，她的研究转向跨大西洋奴隶贸易的纪念和集体暴行纪念馆的空间化。伦理批准和参与同意本文的撰写使用了一个研究项目（2022年北京冬奥会文化遗产的使用）的知识，该项目已获得EPFL人类研究伦理委员会（HREC）的批准。本文的写作使用了一个研究项目（赛事城市的社会空间方面：里约热内卢）的知识，该项目已获得蒙特利尔魁北克大学跨学科人类研究伦理委员会（CIEREH）颁发的伦理证书。 开放获取 本文采用知识共享署名 4.0 国际许可协议进行许可，该协议允许以任何媒介或格式使用、共享、改编、分发和复制，只要您适当注明原作者和来源，提供知识共享许可协议的链接，并说明是否进行了修改。本文中的图片或其他第三方材料均包含在文章的知识共享许可协议中，除非在材料的署名栏中另有说明。如果材料未包含在文章的知识共享许可协议中，且您打算使用的材料不符合法律规定或超出许可使用范围，您需要直接从版权所有者处获得许可。要查看该许可的副本，请访问 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.Reprints and permissionsCite this articleGraezer Bideau, F., Broudehoux, AM.举办大型活动中的工业遗产：评估城市再开发和社会变革的潜力？Built Heritage 8, 40 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00157-wDownload citationReceived：13 August 2024Accepted: 26 August 2024Published: 12 September 2024DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00157-wShare this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
{"title":"Industrial heritage in the hosting of mega-events: assessing the potential for urban redevelopment and social change?","authors":"Florence Graezer Bideau, Anne-Marie Broudehoux","doi":"10.1186/s43238-024-00157-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00157-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mega-events, whether sporting (Olympics, World Cup, etc.) or cultural (Exhibitions), are unique moments to study urban dynamics, especially with regard to image and identity construction (Andranovich et al. 2001; Smith 2012; Gold and Gold 2016). For cities and nations alike, mega-events represent unique opportunities to showcase the best of what they have to offer, hoping to bolster tourism and attract inward foreign investment (Grix and Lee 2013; Hayes and Karamichas 2012; Müller and Gaffney 2018). They are important drivers of the urban intervention meant to build a favourable place-image and yield positive economic returns.</p><p>Over the last few decades, critical studies have highlighted how mega-events downplay, or actively invisibilise, their negative impacts on urban dynamics, in terms of growing economic inequality, social polarisation, politics of exclusion, and resident’s dispossession, leading to multiple forms of mega-events’ resistance and opposition (Gruneau and Horne 2015; Sanchez and Broudehoux 2013). Some scholars (Pillay and Bass 2008) have described the resulting material and immaterial transformations in terms of social engineering, while others talk of sustainability and inclusive development goals (Broudehoux 2017; Stanton 2005, 2019). While mega-events are not the only factors influencing local change, they do exacerbate existing trends and, as such, act as a magnifying glass to reveal with clear clarity the interests and values of local decision-makers, especially in terms of heritage preservation.</p><p>Heritage plays a major part in destination branding and attractiveness. Processes and negotiations among individual and institutional actors to identify, acknowledge, and convey a property’s heritage designation are paramount, as they pertain to meanings associated with memory, identity, and space (Carter et al. 2020). In particular, built heritage is an essential element of the urban landscape, a material bearer of values and meaning. It can be a major asset, as an element of cultural offer that can attest to the city’s historical rootedness and level of cultural sophistication. It can also act as a testimony to its trustworthiness as a safe location for investment and tourism.</p><p>Local states increasingly mobilise industrial heritage sites to host mega-events as a strategy to promote urban development, place branding, and societal change (Theurillat and Graezer Bideau 2022). Led by public-private coalitions of interest that remain faithful to the urban entrepreneurialism governance strategies described by Harvey a few decades ago (Harvey 1989), these endeavours impact both infrastructure and landmark development, as well as ecological and social environments. The paper by Graezer Bideau, Deng and Roux compares dominant discourses surrounding the reuse of industrial heritage in the context of mega-events. Specifically, it analyses the Shanghai 2010 World Expo and the London 2012 Summer Olympic Games. Meanwhile, Zha","PeriodicalId":33925,"journal":{"name":"Built Heritage","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142199558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-11DOI: 10.1186/s43238-024-00152-1
Yujie Zhu
This paper explores the intricate interactions between heritage and religion in modern China, as well as the broader social and political implications of these interactions in relation to national heritage policies and local developmental practices. By conducting a longitudinal analysis of the social history of Baosheng Temple, this research traces its transformations over the past hundred years from a historically religious site to a local built heritage dedicated to preserving and displaying religious relics. This transformation highlights a shift in the role of religious relics from carriers of practice and thought to focal points for heritage preservation, aimed at supporting nation-building and, more recently, promoting local development through the tourism industry. These changes reflect continuous local responses to broader social transformations towards a modern nation-state as well as the influence of Western ideas and practices. The findings of this research illuminate the evolving values associated with religious heritage and the corresponding implications for Chinese modernity within a secular state context.
{"title":"Evolving heritage in modern China: transforming religious sites for preservation and development","authors":"Yujie Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s43238-024-00152-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00152-1","url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the intricate interactions between heritage and religion in modern China, as well as the broader social and political implications of these interactions in relation to national heritage policies and local developmental practices. By conducting a longitudinal analysis of the social history of Baosheng Temple, this research traces its transformations over the past hundred years from a historically religious site to a local built heritage dedicated to preserving and displaying religious relics. This transformation highlights a shift in the role of religious relics from carriers of practice and thought to focal points for heritage preservation, aimed at supporting nation-building and, more recently, promoting local development through the tourism industry. These changes reflect continuous local responses to broader social transformations towards a modern nation-state as well as the influence of Western ideas and practices. The findings of this research illuminate the evolving values associated with religious heritage and the corresponding implications for Chinese modernity within a secular state context.","PeriodicalId":33925,"journal":{"name":"Built Heritage","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142199559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-05DOI: 10.1186/s43238-024-00145-0
Christina E. Mediastika, Anugrah S. Sudarsono, Sentagi S. Utami, Teguh Setiawan, James G. Mansell, Revianto B. Santosa, Army Wiratama, Ressy J. Yanti, Laurence Cliffe
Kotagede, the capital of the ancient Mataram Kingdom and currently an area in the Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia, is known as a ‘real living museum’. It was previously a residential area with many vital premises and heritage buildings that became a tourist area. Its locally established activities enrich the visual and sound environment of the vicinity. However, it has gradually lost its distinguishing sounds. A series of studies aims to improve the possibility of restoring past soundmarks to preserve the intangible heritage and make living museums as rich as possible. This paper reports the initial stage of the series, which focuses on capturing the rich historical sounds of Kotagede. The study was carefully designed to collect comprehensive data on heritage sounds using qualitative methods consisting of an initial focus group discussion (FGD), in-depth interviews, and a final FGD. These methods resulted in a large amount of data that were processed and classified using the descriptive phenomenology approach with the Colaizzi protocol. The study found that Kotagede has various soundmarks grouped into local and outside sounds. The locally rooted sounds can be grouped into eight categories, some of which can be extended as past and present sounds and a few that have persisted from the past to the present. In the subsequent stage, this classification and local leaders' concerns helped the researchers select and prioritise sounds for preservation and tourism purposes. The study emphasises the importance of choosing suitable participants to provide detailed and comprehensive information.
{"title":"The sound heritage of Kotagede: the evolving soundscape of a living museum","authors":"Christina E. Mediastika, Anugrah S. Sudarsono, Sentagi S. Utami, Teguh Setiawan, James G. Mansell, Revianto B. Santosa, Army Wiratama, Ressy J. Yanti, Laurence Cliffe","doi":"10.1186/s43238-024-00145-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00145-0","url":null,"abstract":"Kotagede, the capital of the ancient Mataram Kingdom and currently an area in the Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia, is known as a ‘real living museum’. It was previously a residential area with many vital premises and heritage buildings that became a tourist area. Its locally established activities enrich the visual and sound environment of the vicinity. However, it has gradually lost its distinguishing sounds. A series of studies aims to improve the possibility of restoring past soundmarks to preserve the intangible heritage and make living museums as rich as possible. This paper reports the initial stage of the series, which focuses on capturing the rich historical sounds of Kotagede. The study was carefully designed to collect comprehensive data on heritage sounds using qualitative methods consisting of an initial focus group discussion (FGD), in-depth interviews, and a final FGD. These methods resulted in a large amount of data that were processed and classified using the descriptive phenomenology approach with the Colaizzi protocol. The study found that Kotagede has various soundmarks grouped into local and outside sounds. The locally rooted sounds can be grouped into eight categories, some of which can be extended as past and present sounds and a few that have persisted from the past to the present. In the subsequent stage, this classification and local leaders' concerns helped the researchers select and prioritise sounds for preservation and tourism purposes. The study emphasises the importance of choosing suitable participants to provide detailed and comprehensive information.","PeriodicalId":33925,"journal":{"name":"Built Heritage","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142199565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-30DOI: 10.1186/s43238-024-00135-2
Maurizio Marinelli
The intent of this article is to analyse the interconnectedness between urban transformation and eco-heritage value over time in Tianjin from a river-city perspective. The focus is on the Hai River’s (海河) contribution to the mechanisms of space and power in imperial, hyper-colonial, and globalising Tianjin. After an analytical excursus of the Haihe’s historical-political-economic roles, attention is given to the Haihe as the fulcrum of Tianjin's creation as a spectacle city in present times. The objectives are to elucidate the Tianjin Municipal Government-led urban ‘beautification’ strategy and analyse the aims and objectives of the 2002 ‘Comprehensive Reconstruction and Redevelopment Plan of the Haihe’s Riversides’ while also considering the actual experience of this transformation. The premise of this article is that the Haihe River has helped determine Tianjin’s politics of design via heritagisation: the historical processes through which cultural heritage is adapted to strategically promote favourable imagery of the river-city for political management purposes.
{"title":"The politics of heritage in a river-city: imperial, hyper-colonial, and globalising Tianjin","authors":"Maurizio Marinelli","doi":"10.1186/s43238-024-00135-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00135-2","url":null,"abstract":"The intent of this article is to analyse the interconnectedness between urban transformation and eco-heritage value over time in Tianjin from a river-city perspective. The focus is on the Hai River’s (海河) contribution to the mechanisms of space and power in imperial, hyper-colonial, and globalising Tianjin. After an analytical excursus of the Haihe’s historical-political-economic roles, attention is given to the Haihe as the fulcrum of Tianjin's creation as a spectacle city in present times. The objectives are to elucidate the Tianjin Municipal Government-led urban ‘beautification’ strategy and analyse the aims and objectives of the 2002 ‘Comprehensive Reconstruction and Redevelopment Plan of the Haihe’s Riversides’ while also considering the actual experience of this transformation. The premise of this article is that the Haihe River has helped determine Tianjin’s politics of design via heritagisation: the historical processes through which cultural heritage is adapted to strategically promote favourable imagery of the river-city for political management purposes.","PeriodicalId":33925,"journal":{"name":"Built Heritage","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142225769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-28DOI: 10.1186/s43238-024-00155-y
Maximilian Felix Chami, Elinaza Mjema
<p> <b>Correction</b><b>: </b><b>Built Heritage 8, 31 (2024)</b> </p><p><b>https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00148-x</b></p><br/><p>Following publication of the original article (Chami and Mjema 2024), the authors reported an error in the Acknowledgements section.</p><p>The originally published Acknowledgements statements were:</p><p>Authors wish to thank the Institute of German Archaeological Institute (DAI), who supported this work in Pangani. We also would like to thank the National Museum of Tanzania through the Department of Monument and Sites for providing permits to conduct this activity.</p><p>The correct Acknowledgements section should read:</p><p>This research work was part of the 'Pangani Shared Colonial Heritage Project' funded by the Culture Preservation Programme (KEP) of the German Foreign Office at the German Archaeological Institute (DAI) in 2023. We also would like to thank the National Museum of Tanzania through the Department of Monument and Sites for providing permits to conduct this activity.</p><p>The original article (Chami and Mjema 2024) has been updated.</p><ul data-track-component="outbound reference" data-track-context="references section"><li><p>Chami, M.F., and E. Mjema. 2024. Local community engagement and gazettement approach in managing and conserving Pangani historic town in Tanzania. <i>Built Heritage</i> 8: 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00148-x.</p><p>Article Google Scholar </p></li></ul><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden="true" focusable="false" height="16" role="img" width="16"><use xlink:href="#icon-eds-i-download-medium" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"></use></svg></p><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Department of Archaeology and Heritage Studies, University of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, P.O Box 35050, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania</p><p>Maximilian Felix Chami & Elinaza Mjema</p></li></ol><span>Authors</span><ol><li><span>Maximilian Felix Chami</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Elinaza Mjema</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li></ol><h3>Corresponding author</h3><p>Correspondence to Maximilian Felix Chami.</p><p><b>Open Access</b> This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds
更正：Built Heritage 8, 31 (2024)https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00148-xFollowing 原文（Chami and Mjema 2024）发表后，作者报告了致谢部分的一处错误。原发表的致谢语句为：作者感谢德国考古研究所（DAI）支持在潘加尼开展的这项工作。正确的致谢部分应为：这项研究工作是 "潘加尼共享殖民遗产项目 "的一部分，该项目由德国外交部文化保护计划（KEP）资助，于 2023 年在德国考古研究所（DAI）进行。我们还要感谢坦桑尼亚国家博物馆通过纪念碑和遗址部提供了开展这项活动的许可。原文（Chami and Mjema 2024）已更新。2024.管理和保护坦桑尼亚潘加尼历史古镇的当地社区参与和地名录方法。Built Heritage 8：31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00148-x.Article Google Scholar Download references作者和工作单位坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆大学考古与遗产研究系，P. O Box 35050, Dar Es Salaam.O Box 35050, Dar Es Salaam, TanzaniaMaximilian Felix Chami & Elinaza MjemaAuthorsMaximilian Felix ChamiView author publications您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarElinaza MjemaView author publications您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarCorresponding authorCorrespondence to Maximilian Felix Chami.开放存取 本文采用知识共享署名 4.0 国际许可协议进行许可，该协议允许以任何媒介或格式使用、共享、改编、分发和复制本文，但必须注明原作者和出处，提供知识共享许可协议的链接，并说明是否进行了修改。本文中的图片或其他第三方材料均包含在文章的知识共享许可协议中，除非在材料的署名栏中另有说明。如果材料未包含在文章的知识共享许可协议中，且您打算使用的材料不符合法律规定或超出许可使用范围，您需要直接从版权所有者处获得许可。要查看该许可的副本，请访问 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.Reprints and permissionsCite this articleChami, M.F., Mjema, E. Correction：管理和保护坦桑尼亚潘加尼历史名镇的当地社区参与和地名录方法。Built Heritage 8, 36 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00155-yDownload citationPublished: 28 August 2024DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00155-yShare this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
{"title":"Correction: Local community engagement and gazettement approach in managing and conserving Pangani historic town in Tanzania","authors":"Maximilian Felix Chami, Elinaza Mjema","doi":"10.1186/s43238-024-00155-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00155-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000<b>Correction</b><b>: </b><b>Built Heritage 8, 31 (2024)</b>\u0000</p><p><b>https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00148-x</b></p><br/><p>Following publication of the original article (Chami and Mjema 2024), the authors reported an error in the Acknowledgements section.</p><p>The originally published Acknowledgements statements were:</p><p>Authors wish to thank the Institute of German Archaeological Institute (DAI), who supported this work in Pangani. We also would like to thank the National Museum of Tanzania through the Department of Monument and Sites for providing permits to conduct this activity.</p><p>The correct Acknowledgements section should read:</p><p>This research work was part of the 'Pangani Shared Colonial Heritage Project' funded by the Culture Preservation Programme (KEP) of the German Foreign Office at the German Archaeological Institute (DAI) in 2023. We also would like to thank the National Museum of Tanzania through the Department of Monument and Sites for providing permits to conduct this activity.</p><p>The original article (Chami and Mjema 2024) has been updated.</p><ul data-track-component=\"outbound reference\" data-track-context=\"references section\"><li><p>Chami, M.F., and E. Mjema. 2024. Local community engagement and gazettement approach in managing and conserving Pangani historic town in Tanzania. <i>Built Heritage</i> 8: 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00148-x.</p><p>Article Google Scholar </p></li></ul><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></p><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Department of Archaeology and Heritage Studies, University of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, P.O Box 35050, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania</p><p>Maximilian Felix Chami & Elinaza Mjema</p></li></ol><span>Authors</span><ol><li><span>Maximilian Felix Chami</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Elinaza Mjema</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li></ol><h3>Corresponding author</h3><p>Correspondence to Maximilian Felix Chami.</p><p><b>Open Access</b> This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds ","PeriodicalId":33925,"journal":{"name":"Built Heritage","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142225770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alxa League, located in the western part of Inner Mongolia, China, frequently suffers from sandstorms. Such dusty conditions result in sharp increases in respirable particulate matter (PM10) concentration in outdoor and indoor environments, posing a significant health risk to local inhabitants. Vernacular dwellings in this area feature a specific floor plan that includes an entrance space to safeguard indoor air quality during sandstorms while being compatible with the local climate. This study utilises CONTAM, a multizone indoor air quality and ventilation analysis computer program, and field measurements to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of the entrance space in protecting indoor air quality against ambient PM10 pollution under both dusty and normal conditions. The simulation results reveal that the entrance space can effectively mitigate PM10 pollution in the middle room, lowering the average concentration from 47.0 μg/m3 to 37.5 μg/m3 during dust periods. However, PM10 pollution may increase in the entrance space, reaching an average concentration of up to 70.0 μg/m3. Experimental outcomes align with the simulated results. Given that construction activities exacerbate desertification and frequent sandstorms, the above findings help identify the optimal design strategies for energy-efficient green vernacular dwellings in the targeted desert area, promoting environmental harmony and addressing climate change challenges.
{"title":"A study of the impact of entrance space on indoor air quality in vernacular dwellings in desert areas during sandstorms","authors":"Xinyu Zhang, Yushu Liang, Shanshan Shi, Guofeng Shen","doi":"10.1186/s43238-024-00149-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00149-w","url":null,"abstract":"Alxa League, located in the western part of Inner Mongolia, China, frequently suffers from sandstorms. Such dusty conditions result in sharp increases in respirable particulate matter (PM10) concentration in outdoor and indoor environments, posing a significant health risk to local inhabitants. Vernacular dwellings in this area feature a specific floor plan that includes an entrance space to safeguard indoor air quality during sandstorms while being compatible with the local climate. This study utilises CONTAM, a multizone indoor air quality and ventilation analysis computer program, and field measurements to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of the entrance space in protecting indoor air quality against ambient PM10 pollution under both dusty and normal conditions. The simulation results reveal that the entrance space can effectively mitigate PM10 pollution in the middle room, lowering the average concentration from 47.0 μg/m3 to 37.5 μg/m3 during dust periods. However, PM10 pollution may increase in the entrance space, reaching an average concentration of up to 70.0 μg/m3. Experimental outcomes align with the simulated results. Given that construction activities exacerbate desertification and frequent sandstorms, the above findings help identify the optimal design strategies for energy-efficient green vernacular dwellings in the targeted desert area, promoting environmental harmony and addressing climate change challenges.","PeriodicalId":33925,"journal":{"name":"Built Heritage","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142199561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1186/s43238-024-00143-2
Pascal Honisch
Be it the 1873 World’s Fair in Vienna, which established the city's status as a link between the Occident and Orient, or the very first Great Exhibition in 1851 in London, which showcased the then British empire to a global public and the world to its domestic visitors. World’s fairs have been and are still an indispensable part of a shared human history as well as an indicator of a country's economic and cultural relevance on a global scale. They are undoubtedly politically motivated drivers of collective memories and, in turn, nation-building processes. This is why they are not only publicly discussed and thoroughly documented in archives but also often manifested in buildings that long outlast these events and themes but continue to tell their tales. This article elaborates on the ways in which world’s fairs (or expos) have been used as catalysts to develop cities and how they themselves – though ephemeral phenomena – ultimately found their way into urban landscapes and historiography. Moreover, based on his own empirical studies on the last two expos of Shanghai (2010) and Milan (2015), the author elaborates on the placemaking procedures that precede and follow these mega-events, reflecting on the ensuing public discourse to (de)legitimate them, its limitations, and effects on the urban legacy of the aforementioned expos. He then presents an overarching discussion on their built heritage.
{"title":"Making history, making place—contextualising the built heritage of world expos 2010 and 2015","authors":"Pascal Honisch","doi":"10.1186/s43238-024-00143-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00143-2","url":null,"abstract":"Be it the 1873 World’s Fair in Vienna, which established the city's status as a link between the Occident and Orient, or the very first Great Exhibition in 1851 in London, which showcased the then British empire to a global public and the world to its domestic visitors. World’s fairs have been and are still an indispensable part of a shared human history as well as an indicator of a country's economic and cultural relevance on a global scale. They are undoubtedly politically motivated drivers of collective memories and, in turn, nation-building processes. This is why they are not only publicly discussed and thoroughly documented in archives but also often manifested in buildings that long outlast these events and themes but continue to tell their tales. This article elaborates on the ways in which world’s fairs (or expos) have been used as catalysts to develop cities and how they themselves – though ephemeral phenomena – ultimately found their way into urban landscapes and historiography. Moreover, based on his own empirical studies on the last two expos of Shanghai (2010) and Milan (2015), the author elaborates on the placemaking procedures that precede and follow these mega-events, reflecting on the ensuing public discourse to (de)legitimate them, its limitations, and effects on the urban legacy of the aforementioned expos. He then presents an overarching discussion on their built heritage.","PeriodicalId":33925,"journal":{"name":"Built Heritage","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142199560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-19DOI: 10.1186/s43238-024-00150-3
Yichuan Chen
This paper explores the creation, development, and dissemination of prefabricated concrete rural houses in Jiangsu Province in East China from 1961 to the 1980s, an example of the technological transition provoked by the depletion of forest and timber in China. Through archival research, fieldwork and interviews, the paper examines the two waves of design and dissemination of prefabricated concrete rural houses between 1961 and 1965 and their subsequent ‘vernacularisation’ in the 1970s and the 1980s. This research provides a twofold insight into the current scholarly debates surrounding built heritage and global climate change. On one hand, it addresses a historical context of concrete overuse in contemporary China, a matter of critical importance in relation to carbon emissions and global climate change. On the other hand, it offers a counter-argument to today's call for reintroducing timber structures in many places, as evidenced by the case of East China, where the widespread use of materials like concrete was primarily a consequence of the ecological crisis following decades of deforestation and timber resource depletion. In addition, the ‘vernacularisation’ of concrete structures manifested by this case still provides lessons for today’s efforts to popularise more eco-friendly construction materials and technologies, especially in rural areas, and the prefabricated concrete houses possess potential heritage values as trackers of ecological changes.
{"title":"When concrete was considered sustainable: ecological crisis, technological transition and the prefabricated concrete rural houses in Jiangsu Province from 1961 to the 1980s","authors":"Yichuan Chen","doi":"10.1186/s43238-024-00150-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00150-3","url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the creation, development, and dissemination of prefabricated concrete rural houses in Jiangsu Province in East China from 1961 to the 1980s, an example of the technological transition provoked by the depletion of forest and timber in China. Through archival research, fieldwork and interviews, the paper examines the two waves of design and dissemination of prefabricated concrete rural houses between 1961 and 1965 and their subsequent ‘vernacularisation’ in the 1970s and the 1980s. This research provides a twofold insight into the current scholarly debates surrounding built heritage and global climate change. On one hand, it addresses a historical context of concrete overuse in contemporary China, a matter of critical importance in relation to carbon emissions and global climate change. On the other hand, it offers a counter-argument to today's call for reintroducing timber structures in many places, as evidenced by the case of East China, where the widespread use of materials like concrete was primarily a consequence of the ecological crisis following decades of deforestation and timber resource depletion. In addition, the ‘vernacularisation’ of concrete structures manifested by this case still provides lessons for today’s efforts to popularise more eco-friendly construction materials and technologies, especially in rural areas, and the prefabricated concrete houses possess potential heritage values as trackers of ecological changes.","PeriodicalId":33925,"journal":{"name":"Built Heritage","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142199563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-16DOI: 10.1186/s43238-024-00147-y
Lucas Lixinski
<img alt="" src="//media.springernature.com/lw335/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs43238-024-00147-y/MediaObjects/43238_2024_147_Figa_HTML.png"/><p>This open access volume brings together 38 chapters that reflect on different facets of the 1972 Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (WHC). The WHC is one of the world’s most successful treaty regimes of all times in terms of its widespread ratification and recognizability, and certainly the most successful one under UNESCO’s umbrella. The volume’s publication, timed to coincide with the 50<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the treaty’s adoption, marks an apt moment for celebration, reflection, and mobilisation.</p><p>The volume particularly focuses on the idea of ongoing threats to world heritage and its regime, and the idea of destruction. As the editors put it in their concluding chapter to the volume, ‘Heritage creates identity and the destruction of heritage destroys identity.’ (p. 482). The stakes for the world on which the volume seeks to have an impact are high indeed.</p><p>The volume is the product of a series of workshops the editors held over the course of 2021, followed by an international conference. In addition to two introductory chapters (Part I) and six chapters dedicated to ‘the day after tomorrow’ for the WHC (Part III), the bulk of the book (Part II) is organised around six specific themes that foreground threats to the WHC: global governance; urban transformation; war and terrorism; climate change; technological change; and commodification.</p><p>Part I of the book contains two introductory texts. One is an overall introduction, authored by all editors, Marie-Theres Albert, Roland Bernecker, Claire Cave, Anca Claudia Prodan, and Matthias Ripp, which describes the purposes of the volume, its background, and summarises all the chapters. The second chapter, by Birgitta Ringbeck, outlines the importance of the WHC, and the need for its reimagining, particularly in terms of its representativeness, and its ability to incorporate voices still largely excluded from its processes. In particular, it argues that the WHC can become a tool to address the ‘losses and breaks caused by colonization’, which ‘still have an impact on the awareness of and the access to heritage, as well as on the possibility to build on conservation policies that have evolved over time, on political attention and, last but not least, on active participation in the implementation of the Convention.’ (p. 24).</p><p>This quote from Ringbeck’s chapter encapsulates, in many ways, what I see as the key tension that runs through the volume. Specifically, the contributors to the volume seem to be all animated by the possibility of reforming the WHC system to make it serve a new or changing world. This view, while wonderfully optimistic, is not without its limits.</p><p>To be fair, the WHC has proven to be a remarkably resilient and adaptable instrument over the past five decades,
{"title":"50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation, by Marie-Theres Albert, Roland Bernecker, Claire Cave, Anca Claudia Prodan and Matthias Ripp. Springer Cham, 2022. 504pp. ISBN9783031056628","authors":"Lucas Lixinski","doi":"10.1186/s43238-024-00147-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00147-y","url":null,"abstract":"<img alt=\"\" src=\"//media.springernature.com/lw335/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs43238-024-00147-y/MediaObjects/43238_2024_147_Figa_HTML.png\"/><p>This open access volume brings together 38 chapters that reflect on different facets of the 1972 Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (WHC). The WHC is one of the world’s most successful treaty regimes of all times in terms of its widespread ratification and recognizability, and certainly the most successful one under UNESCO’s umbrella. The volume’s publication, timed to coincide with the 50<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the treaty’s adoption, marks an apt moment for celebration, reflection, and mobilisation.</p><p>The volume particularly focuses on the idea of ongoing threats to world heritage and its regime, and the idea of destruction. As the editors put it in their concluding chapter to the volume, ‘Heritage creates identity and the destruction of heritage destroys identity.’ (p. 482). The stakes for the world on which the volume seeks to have an impact are high indeed.</p><p>The volume is the product of a series of workshops the editors held over the course of 2021, followed by an international conference. In addition to two introductory chapters (Part I) and six chapters dedicated to ‘the day after tomorrow’ for the WHC (Part III), the bulk of the book (Part II) is organised around six specific themes that foreground threats to the WHC: global governance; urban transformation; war and terrorism; climate change; technological change; and commodification.</p><p>Part I of the book contains two introductory texts. One is an overall introduction, authored by all editors, Marie-Theres Albert, Roland Bernecker, Claire Cave, Anca Claudia Prodan, and Matthias Ripp, which describes the purposes of the volume, its background, and summarises all the chapters. The second chapter, by Birgitta Ringbeck, outlines the importance of the WHC, and the need for its reimagining, particularly in terms of its representativeness, and its ability to incorporate voices still largely excluded from its processes. In particular, it argues that the WHC can become a tool to address the ‘losses and breaks caused by colonization’, which ‘still have an impact on the awareness of and the access to heritage, as well as on the possibility to build on conservation policies that have evolved over time, on political attention and, last but not least, on active participation in the implementation of the Convention.’ (p. 24).</p><p>This quote from Ringbeck’s chapter encapsulates, in many ways, what I see as the key tension that runs through the volume. Specifically, the contributors to the volume seem to be all animated by the possibility of reforming the WHC system to make it serve a new or changing world. This view, while wonderfully optimistic, is not without its limits.</p><p>To be fair, the WHC has proven to be a remarkably resilient and adaptable instrument over the past five decades, ","PeriodicalId":33925,"journal":{"name":"Built Heritage","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142199562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：