{"title":"Suppression of negative tweets using reinforcement learning systems","authors":"Kazuteru Miyazaki , Hitomi Miyazaki","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.101207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, damage caused by negative tweets has become a social problem. In this paper, we consider a method of suppressing negative tweets by using reinforcement learning<span>. In particular, we consider the case where tweet writing is modeled as a multi-agent environment. Numerical experiments verify the effects of suppression using various reinforcement learning methods. We will also verify robustness to environmental changes. We compared the results of Profit Sharing (PS) and Q-learning (QL) as reinforcement learning methods to confirm the effectiveness of PS, and confirmed the behavior of the rationality theorem in a multi-agent environment. Furthermore, in experiments regarding the ability to follow environmental changes, it was confirmed that PS is more robust than QL. If machines can appropriately intervene and interact with posts made by humans, we can expect that negative tweets and even blow-ups can be suppressed automatically without the need for costly human eye monitoring.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041723001419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent years, damage caused by negative tweets has become a social problem. In this paper, we consider a method of suppressing negative tweets by using reinforcement learning. In particular, we consider the case where tweet writing is modeled as a multi-agent environment. Numerical experiments verify the effects of suppression using various reinforcement learning methods. We will also verify robustness to environmental changes. We compared the results of Profit Sharing (PS) and Q-learning (QL) as reinforcement learning methods to confirm the effectiveness of PS, and confirmed the behavior of the rationality theorem in a multi-agent environment. Furthermore, in experiments regarding the ability to follow environmental changes, it was confirmed that PS is more robust than QL. If machines can appropriately intervene and interact with posts made by humans, we can expect that negative tweets and even blow-ups can be suppressed automatically without the need for costly human eye monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial.
The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition.
Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.