Sex ratio affects sexual selection against mutant alleles in a locus-specific way.

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioral Ecology Pub Date : 2023-12-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/beheco/arad110
Sakshi Sharda, Brian Hollis, Tadeusz J Kawecki
{"title":"Sex ratio affects sexual selection against mutant alleles in a locus-specific way.","authors":"Sakshi Sharda, Brian Hollis, Tadeusz J Kawecki","doi":"10.1093/beheco/arad110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Higher male:female operational sex ratio (OSR) is often assumed to lead to stronger sexual selection on males. Yet, this premise has been directly tested by very few studies, with mixed outcomes. We investigated how OSR affects the strength of sexual selection against two deleterious alleles, a natural <i>ebony</i> mutant and a transgenic <i>GFP</i> insertion, in <i>Drosophila melanogaster.</i> To this end, we estimated the relative paternity share of homozygous mutant males competing against wild-type males under different OSRs (1:2, 1:1, 2:1). We also manipulated the mating pool density (18, 36, or 54 individuals) and assessed paternity over three consecutive days, during which the nature of sexual interaction changed. The strength of sexual selection against the <i>ebony</i> mutant increased with OSR, became weaker after the first day, and was little affected by density. In contrast, sexual selection against the <i>GFP</i> transgene was markedly affected by density: at the highest density, it increased with OSR, but at lower densities, it was strongest at 1:1 OSR, remaining strong throughout the experiment. Thus, while OSR can strongly affect the strength of sexual selection against \"bad genes,\" it does not necessarily increase monotonically with male:female OSR. Furthermore, the pattern of relationship between OSR and the strength of sexual selection can be locus-specific, likely reflecting the specific phenotypic effects of the mutation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8840,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology","volume":"35 1","pages":"arad110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10756055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arad110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Higher male:female operational sex ratio (OSR) is often assumed to lead to stronger sexual selection on males. Yet, this premise has been directly tested by very few studies, with mixed outcomes. We investigated how OSR affects the strength of sexual selection against two deleterious alleles, a natural ebony mutant and a transgenic GFP insertion, in Drosophila melanogaster. To this end, we estimated the relative paternity share of homozygous mutant males competing against wild-type males under different OSRs (1:2, 1:1, 2:1). We also manipulated the mating pool density (18, 36, or 54 individuals) and assessed paternity over three consecutive days, during which the nature of sexual interaction changed. The strength of sexual selection against the ebony mutant increased with OSR, became weaker after the first day, and was little affected by density. In contrast, sexual selection against the GFP transgene was markedly affected by density: at the highest density, it increased with OSR, but at lower densities, it was strongest at 1:1 OSR, remaining strong throughout the experiment. Thus, while OSR can strongly affect the strength of sexual selection against "bad genes," it does not necessarily increase monotonically with male:female OSR. Furthermore, the pattern of relationship between OSR and the strength of sexual selection can be locus-specific, likely reflecting the specific phenotypic effects of the mutation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别比例以特定位点的方式影响针对突变等位基因的性选择。
较高的雌雄操作性比(OSR)通常被认为会导致对雄性更强的性选择。然而,只有极少数研究对这一假设进行了直接测试,结果喜忧参半。我们研究了雌雄操作性比如何影响针对黑腹果蝇两种有害等位基因(天然乌木突变体和转基因 GFP 插入体)的性选择强度。为此,我们估算了在不同的OSR(1:2、1:1、2:1)条件下,同卵突变体雄性与野生型雄性竞争时的相对父亲份额。我们还操纵了交配池的密度(18、36 或 54 个个体),并评估了连续三天的父子关系,在此期间,性互动的性质发生了变化。针对乌木突变体的性选择强度随着OSR的增加而增加,第一天后变得较弱,并且几乎不受密度的影响。与此相反,针对 GFP 转基因的性选择明显受到密度的影响:在最高密度下,性选择随 OSR 的增加而增加,但在较低密度下,1:1 OSR 时性选择最强,并在整个实验过程中保持强劲。因此,虽然OSR会强烈影响针对 "坏基因 "的性选择强度,但它并不一定会随着雌雄OSR的增加而单调增加。此外,OSR与性选择强度之间的关系模式可能是因位点而异的,这可能反映了突变的特定表型效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Ecology
Behavioral Ecology 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Studies on the whole range of behaving organisms, including plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, and humans, are included. Behavioral Ecology construes the field in its broadest sense to include 1) the use of ecological and evolutionary processes to explain the occurrence and adaptive significance of behavior patterns; 2) the use of behavioral processes to predict ecological patterns, and 3) empirical, comparative analyses relating behavior to the environment in which it occurs.
期刊最新文献
Urban sensory conditions alter rival interactions and mate choice in urban and forest túngara frogs. Interaction between anthropogenic stressors affects antipredator defense in an intertidal crustacean. An immune challenge induces a decline in parental effort and compensation by the mate. Social and seasonal variation in dwarf mongoose home-range size, daily movements, and burrow use. Detectability of a poison frog and its Batesian mimic depends on body posture and viewing angle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1