A systematic analysis and data mining of opioid-related adverse events submitted to the FAERS database.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Experimental Biology and Medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-30 DOI:10.1177/15353702231211860
Huyen Le, Huixiao Hong, Weigong Ge, Henry Francis, Beverly Lyn-Cook, Yi-Ting Hwang, Paul Rogers, Weida Tong, Wen Zou
{"title":"A systematic analysis and data mining of opioid-related adverse events submitted to the FAERS database.","authors":"Huyen Le, Huixiao Hong, Weigong Ge, Henry Francis, Beverly Lyn-Cook, Yi-Ting Hwang, Paul Rogers, Weida Tong, Wen Zou","doi":"10.1177/15353702231211860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The opioid epidemic has become a serious national crisis in the United States. An indepth systematic analysis of opioid-related adverse events (AEs) can clarify the risks presented by opioid exposure, as well as the individual risk profiles of specific opioid drugs and the potential relationships among the opioids. In this study, 92 opioids were identified from the list of all Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs, annotated by RxNorm and were classified into 13 opioid groups: buprenorphine, codeine, dihydrocodeine, fentanyl, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, meperidine, methadone, morphine, oxycodone, oxymorphone, tapentadol, and tramadol. A total of 14,970,399 AE reports were retrieved and downloaded from the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) from 2004, Quarter 1 to 2020, Quarter 3. After data processing, Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM) was then applied which identified 3317 pairs of potential risk signals within the 13 opioid groups. Based on these potential safety signals, a comparative analysis was pursued to provide a global overview of opioid-related AEs for all 13 groups of FDA-approved prescription opioids. The top 10 most reported AEs for each opioid class were then presented. Both network analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis were conducted to further explore the relationship between opioids. Results from the network analysis revealed a close association among fentanyl, oxycodone, hydrocodone, and hydromorphone, which shared more than 22 AEs. In addition, much less commonly reported AEs were shared among dihydrocodeine, meperidine, oxymorphone, and tapentadol. On the contrary, the hierarchical clustering analysis further categorized the 13 opioid classes into two groups by comparing the full profiles of presence/absence of AEs. The results of network analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis were not only consistent and cross-validated each other but also provided a better and deeper understanding of the associations and relationships between the 13 opioid groups with respect to their adverse effect profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":12163,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1944-1951"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10798186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15353702231211860","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The opioid epidemic has become a serious national crisis in the United States. An indepth systematic analysis of opioid-related adverse events (AEs) can clarify the risks presented by opioid exposure, as well as the individual risk profiles of specific opioid drugs and the potential relationships among the opioids. In this study, 92 opioids were identified from the list of all Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs, annotated by RxNorm and were classified into 13 opioid groups: buprenorphine, codeine, dihydrocodeine, fentanyl, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, meperidine, methadone, morphine, oxycodone, oxymorphone, tapentadol, and tramadol. A total of 14,970,399 AE reports were retrieved and downloaded from the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) from 2004, Quarter 1 to 2020, Quarter 3. After data processing, Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM) was then applied which identified 3317 pairs of potential risk signals within the 13 opioid groups. Based on these potential safety signals, a comparative analysis was pursued to provide a global overview of opioid-related AEs for all 13 groups of FDA-approved prescription opioids. The top 10 most reported AEs for each opioid class were then presented. Both network analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis were conducted to further explore the relationship between opioids. Results from the network analysis revealed a close association among fentanyl, oxycodone, hydrocodone, and hydromorphone, which shared more than 22 AEs. In addition, much less commonly reported AEs were shared among dihydrocodeine, meperidine, oxymorphone, and tapentadol. On the contrary, the hierarchical clustering analysis further categorized the 13 opioid classes into two groups by comparing the full profiles of presence/absence of AEs. The results of network analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis were not only consistent and cross-validated each other but also provided a better and deeper understanding of the associations and relationships between the 13 opioid groups with respect to their adverse effect profiles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对提交至 FAERS 数据库的阿片类药物相关不良事件进行系统分析和数据挖掘。
在美国,阿片类药物的流行已成为一场严重的全国性危机。对阿片类药物相关不良事件(AEs)进行深入系统的分析可以明确阿片类药物暴露所带来的风险,以及特定阿片类药物的个体风险特征和阿片类药物之间的潜在关系。在这项研究中,从美国食品药品管理局(FDA)批准的所有药物清单中确定了 92 种阿片类药物,并由 RxNorm 进行了注释,将其分为 13 个阿片类药物组:丁丙诺啡、可待因、双氢可待因、芬太尼、氢可酮、氢吗啡酮、美培林、美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮、羟吗啡酮、他喷他多和曲马多。从美国食品药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FDA Adverse Events Reporting System,FAERS)中检索并下载了 2004 年第 1 季度至 2020 年第 3 季度共 14,970,399 份不良事件报告。数据处理后,应用经验贝叶斯几何平均法 (EBGM),在 13 个阿片类药物组中识别出 3317 对潜在风险信号。在这些潜在安全信号的基础上,进行了比较分析,以提供 FDA 批准的所有 13 组阿片类处方药的阿片相关 AE 的总体概况。然后列出了每类阿片类药物报告最多的前 10 种 AE。为了进一步探究阿片类药物之间的关系,我们进行了网络分析和分层聚类分析。网络分析的结果显示,芬太尼、羟考酮、氢可酮和氢吗啡酮之间存在密切联系,它们共有超过 22 种 AE。此外,双氢可待因、美佩里定、羟吗啡酮和他喷他多之间共用的 AEs 要少得多。相反,分层聚类分析通过比较出现/不出现 AEs 的全部情况,进一步将 13 种阿片类药物分为两组。网络分析和分层聚类分析的结果不仅相互一致、相互验证,而且能更好、更深入地了解 13 个阿片类药物组之间在不良反应特征方面的关联和关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Biology and Medicine
Experimental Biology and Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Biology and Medicine (EBM) is a global, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research in the biomedical sciences. EBM provides both research and review articles as well as meeting symposia and brief communications. Articles in EBM represent cutting edge research at the overlapping junctions of the biological, physical and engineering sciences that impact upon the health and welfare of the world''s population. Topics covered in EBM include: Anatomy/Pathology; Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Bioimaging; Biomedical Engineering; Bionanoscience; Cell and Developmental Biology; Endocrinology and Nutrition; Environmental Health/Biomarkers/Precision Medicine; Genomics, Proteomics, and Bioinformatics; Immunology/Microbiology/Virology; Mechanisms of Aging; Neuroscience; Pharmacology and Toxicology; Physiology; Stem Cell Biology; Structural Biology; Systems Biology and Microphysiological Systems; and Translational Research.
期刊最新文献
STEMIN and YAP5SA, the future of heart repair? Fructose metabolism is unregulated in cancers and placentae. Subunit-specific mechanisms of isoflurane-induced acute tonic inhibition in dentate gyrus granule neuron. Quantitative characterization of retinal features in translated OCTA. Exosomal circPTPRK promotes angiogenesis after radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1