In Silico Pharmacokinetics Evaluation of Forgiveness for Doravirine and Rilpivirine.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-26 DOI:10.1097/FTD.0000000000001169
Yeleen Fromage, Najwa Jamal, Cyrielle Codde, Caroline Monchaud, Marc Labriffe, Laure Ponthier, Pierre Marquet, Jean François Faucher, Jean-Baptiste Woillard
{"title":"In Silico Pharmacokinetics Evaluation of Forgiveness for Doravirine and Rilpivirine.","authors":"Yeleen Fromage, Najwa Jamal, Cyrielle Codde, Caroline Monchaud, Marc Labriffe, Laure Ponthier, Pierre Marquet, Jean François Faucher, Jean-Baptiste Woillard","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the concentrations of rilpivirine (RLP) and doravirine (DOR) after 3 days-off using simulations from population pharmacokinetics models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a series of 500 sets of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations to examine the steady-state conditions for 2 common dosage levels: 25 mg/d for RLP and 100 mg/d for DOR. These simulations were conducted under 2 scenarios: 1 without drug cessation and another after a 3-day break. The validity of the implementation was established through a comparison of median trough concentrations (C24h) with previously reported data. Subsequently, the proportion of simulated patients with C24h and C72h after 3 days-off (C72h/3do) that exceeded the inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50), 5.2 mcg/L for DOR and 20.5 mcg/L for RLP respectively, was calculated. The inhibitory quotient (IQ) was also computed, which was 6 times IC50 for DOR and 4.5 times IC50 for RLP. Finally, nomograms were constructed to estimate the probability of having C72h/3do > IC50 or > IQ for different ranges of C24h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulated C24h median ± SD for RLP were 61.8 ± 0.4 mcg/L and for DOR 397 ± 0 mcg/L. For RLP, 99.3 ± 0.1% exceeded IC50 at C24h, 16.4 ± 0.4% at C72h/3do, and none surpassed the IQ threshold. In contrast, DOR had 100% ± 0% above IC50 at C24h, 93.6 ± 0.2% at C72h/3do, and 58.6 ± 0.5% exceeded the IQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that treatment with DOR may offer a more forgiving therapeutic profile than RLP, given the larger proportion of patients achieving effective drug exposure with DOR. However, it is important to acknowledge a significant limitation of this study, namely, the assumption that drug concentration is a perfect surrogate for drug effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"391-396"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the concentrations of rilpivirine (RLP) and doravirine (DOR) after 3 days-off using simulations from population pharmacokinetics models.

Methods: The authors conducted a series of 500 sets of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations to examine the steady-state conditions for 2 common dosage levels: 25 mg/d for RLP and 100 mg/d for DOR. These simulations were conducted under 2 scenarios: 1 without drug cessation and another after a 3-day break. The validity of the implementation was established through a comparison of median trough concentrations (C24h) with previously reported data. Subsequently, the proportion of simulated patients with C24h and C72h after 3 days-off (C72h/3do) that exceeded the inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50), 5.2 mcg/L for DOR and 20.5 mcg/L for RLP respectively, was calculated. The inhibitory quotient (IQ) was also computed, which was 6 times IC50 for DOR and 4.5 times IC50 for RLP. Finally, nomograms were constructed to estimate the probability of having C72h/3do > IC50 or > IQ for different ranges of C24h.

Results: Simulated C24h median ± SD for RLP were 61.8 ± 0.4 mcg/L and for DOR 397 ± 0 mcg/L. For RLP, 99.3 ± 0.1% exceeded IC50 at C24h, 16.4 ± 0.4% at C72h/3do, and none surpassed the IQ threshold. In contrast, DOR had 100% ± 0% above IC50 at C24h, 93.6 ± 0.2% at C72h/3do, and 58.6 ± 0.5% exceeded the IQ.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that treatment with DOR may offer a more forgiving therapeutic profile than RLP, given the larger proportion of patients achieving effective drug exposure with DOR. However, it is important to acknowledge a significant limitation of this study, namely, the assumption that drug concentration is a perfect surrogate for drug effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多拉韦林和利匹韦林恕性的硅学药代动力学评估
背景:本研究旨在利用群体药代动力学模型模拟评估利匹韦林(RLP)和多拉韦林(DOR)停药三天后的浓度:本研究旨在利用群体药代动力学模型模拟评估利匹韦林(RLP)和多拉韦林(DOR)停药 3 天后的浓度:作者进行了一系列共 500 组 10,000 次蒙特卡罗模拟,以检查两种常见剂量水平的稳态条件:RLP 为 25 毫克/天,DOR 为 100 毫克/天。这些模拟在两种情况下进行:一种情况是未停药,另一种情况是停药 3 天后。通过比较中位谷浓度(C24h)与之前报告的数据,确定了实施的有效性。随后,计算了停药 3 天后 C24h 和 C72h(C72h/3do)超过抑制浓度 50(IC50)的模拟患者比例,DOR 和 RLP 分别为 5.2 微克/升和 20.5 微克/升。还计算了抑制商数(IQ),DOR 的抑制商数是 IC50 的 6 倍,RLP 的抑制商数是 IC50 的 4.5 倍。最后,构建了提名图,以估计在不同的 C24h 范围内 C72h/3do > IC50 或 > IQ 的概率:RLP的模拟C24h中位数(±SD)为61.8±0.4微克/升,DOR的模拟C24h中位数(±SD)为397±0微克/升。对于 RLP,99.3 ± 0.1%在 C24h 时超过 IC50,16.4 ± 0.4%在 C72h/3do 时超过 IC50,没有超过 IQ 临界值。相比之下,DOR在C24h时100%±0%超过IC50,在C72h/3do时93.6±0.2%超过IC50,58.6±0.5%超过IQ:这些研究结果表明,与 RLP 相比,使用 DOR 进行治疗可能会提供更宽松的治疗条件,因为使用 DOR 获得有效药物暴露的患者比例更高。不过,必须承认这项研究存在一个重大局限性,即假设药物浓度是药物疗效的完美替代物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
213
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of pharmacologists, clinical chemists, laboratorians, pharmacists, drug researchers and toxicologists. It fosters the exchange of knowledge among the various disciplines–clinical pharmacology, pathology, toxicology, analytical chemistry–that share a common interest in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. The journal presents studies detailing the various factors that affect the rate and extent drugs are absorbed, metabolized, and excreted. Regular features include review articles on specific classes of drugs, original articles, case reports, technical notes, and continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Serum Concentration of Antidepressant Drugs in Geriatric Day Care Patients With Renal Insufficiency and Multimorbidity. Alternate Sampling Matrices for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Immunosuppressants. Midazolam Boosting With Cobicistat in a Patient With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy and Focal Status Epilepticus. New Developments and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Options in Costimulatory Blockade in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Critical Review. Implementation of Volumetric Finger-Prick Self-Sampling for TDM of Immunosuppressants After Kidney Transplantation: Lessons Learned from the Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1