Pub Date : 2024-11-20DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001283
Tessa Born-Bondt van den, Niels Westra, Katarzyna Krzywicka, Harmen R Moes, Manon Schuls-Fouchier, Daan J Touw, Oude Munnink Thijs H
Background: This report presents the case of a patient with drug-resistant epilepsy. Despite treatment with 4 antiepileptic drugs, the patient experienced an increasing frequency of focal seizures, necessitating hospitalization, and continuous intravenous midazolam infusion.
Methods: Cobicistat was introduced as a pharmacokinetic booster to decrease the metabolic clearance of midazolam, leading to increased exposure and an extended half-life.
Results: Cobicistat boosting allowed the switch from intravenous to oral midazolam, and the patient was discharged on an oral midazolam regimen.
Conclusions: Cobicistat can be effectively used to boost midazolam exposure pharmacokinetically in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who require stable midazolam blood concentrations.
{"title":"Midazolam Boosting With Cobicistat in a Patient With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy and Focal Status Epilepticus.","authors":"Tessa Born-Bondt van den, Niels Westra, Katarzyna Krzywicka, Harmen R Moes, Manon Schuls-Fouchier, Daan J Touw, Oude Munnink Thijs H","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001283","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001283","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This report presents the case of a patient with drug-resistant epilepsy. Despite treatment with 4 antiepileptic drugs, the patient experienced an increasing frequency of focal seizures, necessitating hospitalization, and continuous intravenous midazolam infusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cobicistat was introduced as a pharmacokinetic booster to decrease the metabolic clearance of midazolam, leading to increased exposure and an extended half-life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cobicistat boosting allowed the switch from intravenous to oral midazolam, and the patient was discharged on an oral midazolam regimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cobicistat can be effectively used to boost midazolam exposure pharmacokinetically in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who require stable midazolam blood concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142676932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-20DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001275
Gretchen N de Graav, Suwasin Udomkarnjananun, Carla C Baan, Marlies E J Reinders, Joke I Roodnat, Brenda C M de Winter, Dennis A Hesselink
Purpose: In this review, the authors summarized the latest developments in costimulatory blockade to prevent rejection after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and discussed possibilities for future research and the need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of these agents.
Methods: Studies about costimulatory blockers in SOT in humans or animal transplant models in the past decade (2014-2024) were systematically reviewed in PubMed, European Union clinical trials (EudraCT), and ClinicalTrials.gov.
Results: Seventy-five registered clinical trials and 58 published articles were found on costimulation blockade of the CD28-CD80/86, CD40-CD40L, and OX40-OX40L pathways. Belatacept, an antagonist of the CD28-CD80/86 pathway, is the only approved costimulatory agent in SOT, hence accounting for most of the research. Other identified costimulatory blocking agents included abatacept and CD28 antagonists tegoprubart, dazodalibep, and TNX-1500. Although tegoprubart was unsuccessful in pancreas transplantation in nonhuman primates, trials in human kidney transplantation are underway. Dazodalibep trials faced recruitment challenges. TNX-1500 was unsuccessful in animal studies and is currently not pursued in humans. After discontinuation of iscalimab (CD40-CD154 pathway antagonist) in SOT, the alternatives, bleselumab and KPL404, showed promising results in kidney transplantation and cardiac xenotransplantation. Studies on secondary costimulatory pathway antagonists, such as OX40-OX40L, have only used animal models. Despite the low interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) in all studied agents, TDM could be useful for optimizing dosing in PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) studies.
Conclusions: The routine use of costimulation blockade in SOT is hindered by problems in efficacy compared with the standard of care. Costimulatory inhibitors could be combined in a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen. Future PK/pharmacodynamic studies in costimulatory agents and personalized medicine could warrant TDM of these agents.
目的:在这篇综述中,作者总结了成本刺激阻断剂在预防实体器官移植(SOT)后排斥反应方面的最新进展,并讨论了未来研究的可能性以及对这些药物进行治疗药物监测(TDM)的必要性:方法:在PubMed、欧盟临床试验(EudraCT)和ClinicalTrials.gov.Results.中系统回顾了过去十年(2014-2024年)在人体或动物移植模型中使用成本刺激阻断剂治疗SOT的研究:结果:共发现75项注册临床试验和58篇已发表文章,内容涉及CD28-CD80/86、CD40-CD40L和OX40-OX40L途径的成本刺激阻断。贝拉替塞(Belatacept)是 CD28-CD80/86 通路的拮抗剂,也是唯一获准用于 SOT 的成本刺激药物,因此占据了大部分研究内容。其他已确定的成本刺激阻断剂包括阿巴他赛普特和 CD28 拮抗剂 tegoprubart、dazodalibep 和 TNX-1500。虽然 Tegoprubart 在非人灵长类的胰腺移植中没有取得成功,但在人类肾脏移植中的试验正在进行中。Dazodalibep试验面临招募困难。TNX-1500 在动物实验中未取得成功,目前也未用于人体。在 SOT 中停止使用异卡利单抗(CD40-CD154 通路拮抗剂)后,替代药物 bleselumab 和 KPL404 在肾移植和心脏异种移植中显示出良好的效果。关于次级激动通路拮抗剂(如 OX40-OX40L)的研究仅使用了动物模型。尽管所有研究药物的药代动力学(PK)个体间变异性较低,但TDM可用于优化PK/药效学(PD)研究中的剂量:结论:与标准治疗相比,成本刺激阻滞剂在 SOT 中的常规使用因疗效问题而受到阻碍。成本刺激抑制剂可与不含降钙素酶抑制剂的治疗方案相结合。未来对成本刺激剂和个性化药物的 PK/药效学研究可能会为这些药物的 TDM 提供依据。
{"title":"New Developments and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Options in Costimulatory Blockade in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Critical Review.","authors":"Gretchen N de Graav, Suwasin Udomkarnjananun, Carla C Baan, Marlies E J Reinders, Joke I Roodnat, Brenda C M de Winter, Dennis A Hesselink","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001275","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this review, the authors summarized the latest developments in costimulatory blockade to prevent rejection after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and discussed possibilities for future research and the need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of these agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies about costimulatory blockers in SOT in humans or animal transplant models in the past decade (2014-2024) were systematically reviewed in PubMed, European Union clinical trials (EudraCT), and ClinicalTrials.gov.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five registered clinical trials and 58 published articles were found on costimulation blockade of the CD28-CD80/86, CD40-CD40L, and OX40-OX40L pathways. Belatacept, an antagonist of the CD28-CD80/86 pathway, is the only approved costimulatory agent in SOT, hence accounting for most of the research. Other identified costimulatory blocking agents included abatacept and CD28 antagonists tegoprubart, dazodalibep, and TNX-1500. Although tegoprubart was unsuccessful in pancreas transplantation in nonhuman primates, trials in human kidney transplantation are underway. Dazodalibep trials faced recruitment challenges. TNX-1500 was unsuccessful in animal studies and is currently not pursued in humans. After discontinuation of iscalimab (CD40-CD154 pathway antagonist) in SOT, the alternatives, bleselumab and KPL404, showed promising results in kidney transplantation and cardiac xenotransplantation. Studies on secondary costimulatory pathway antagonists, such as OX40-OX40L, have only used animal models. Despite the low interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) in all studied agents, TDM could be useful for optimizing dosing in PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The routine use of costimulation blockade in SOT is hindered by problems in efficacy compared with the standard of care. Costimulatory inhibitors could be combined in a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen. Future PK/pharmacodynamic studies in costimulatory agents and personalized medicine could warrant TDM of these agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142682886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001281
Nils Tore Vethe, Anders Åsberg, Stein Bergan, Ida Robertsen, Karsten Midtvedt
Background: Home-based hospital services are becoming increasingly popular, and the addition of remote outpatient appointments after kidney transplantation facilitates more practical and closer follow-up. In this context, finger-prick self-sampling is an important aspect of monitoring of immunosuppressants and biomarkers. Nevertheless, several issues must be addressed to ensure the feasibility and quality when implementing microsampling in clinical practice. We summarize our experiences and opinions in this field.
Methods: This article is based on the authors' experience regarding the laboratory and clinical implementation of finger-prick self-sampling in kidney transplant recipients. The referenced literature is related to the authors' knowledge in this field.
Results: We present considerations for the selection of relevant analytes, key characteristics of selected volumetric sampling tools (Mitra and Capitainer), and the associated sampling pitfalls. In addition, we address the requirements for patients performing finger-prick sampling, appropriate design of methods and workflow, critical points for validation, and aspects related to logistics and digital solutions.
Conclusions: Volumetric finger-prick self-sampling is suitable for monitoring immunosuppressants and certain biomarkers that are relevant to outpatient follow-up after kidney transplantation. We believe that a carefully designed system for the entire workflow, including patient training, will be beneficial in enabling a safe experience for transplant recipients, as well as ensuring overall efficiency and adequate quality. In the future, a combination of immunosuppressants with a wide range of biomarkers has significant potential for use in at-home self-sampling after kidney transplantation.
{"title":"Implementation of Volumetric Finger-Prick Self-Sampling for TDM of Immunosuppressants After Kidney Transplantation: Lessons Learned from the Practice.","authors":"Nils Tore Vethe, Anders Åsberg, Stein Bergan, Ida Robertsen, Karsten Midtvedt","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001281","DOIUrl":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001281","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Home-based hospital services are becoming increasingly popular, and the addition of remote outpatient appointments after kidney transplantation facilitates more practical and closer follow-up. In this context, finger-prick self-sampling is an important aspect of monitoring of immunosuppressants and biomarkers. Nevertheless, several issues must be addressed to ensure the feasibility and quality when implementing microsampling in clinical practice. We summarize our experiences and opinions in this field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article is based on the authors' experience regarding the laboratory and clinical implementation of finger-prick self-sampling in kidney transplant recipients. The referenced literature is related to the authors' knowledge in this field.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We present considerations for the selection of relevant analytes, key characteristics of selected volumetric sampling tools (Mitra and Capitainer), and the associated sampling pitfalls. In addition, we address the requirements for patients performing finger-prick sampling, appropriate design of methods and workflow, critical points for validation, and aspects related to logistics and digital solutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Volumetric finger-prick self-sampling is suitable for monitoring immunosuppressants and certain biomarkers that are relevant to outpatient follow-up after kidney transplantation. We believe that a carefully designed system for the entire workflow, including patient training, will be beneficial in enabling a safe experience for transplant recipients, as well as ensuring overall efficiency and adequate quality. In the future, a combination of immunosuppressants with a wide range of biomarkers has significant potential for use in at-home self-sampling after kidney transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142669307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001258
Femke Hooijberg, Stefan P H van den Berg, Zohra Layegh, Maureen Leeuw, Ori Elkayam, Annick de Vries, Mike Nurmohamed, Theo Rispens, Thomas P C Dorlo, Gertjan Wolbink
Background: Tocilizumab targets the interleukin-6 receptor, and dosing is complex owing to its nonlinear clearance related to target binding. Therefore, tapering tocilizumab requires a different approach than that of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). This study aimed to identify these differences and enable personalized treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) beyond TNFi therapy.
Methods: A population pharmacokinetic model of intravenous tocilizumab was developed using data from a randomized controlled trial of dose tapering in patients with RA. Subsequent population-level Monte Carlo and individual Bayesian simulations were performed to create tapering strategies involving dose reduction and interval extension. The target trough concentration of tocilizumab was 5 mg/L. Finally, the drug savings were compared between the 2 methods.
Results: The pharmacokinetic of tocilizumab was described with a 2-compartment model with parallel linear (CL 0.20 L/d) and nonlinear (VM 5.2 mg/d, KM 0.19 mg/L) elimination. The linear clearance rate and central volume of distribution increased with lean body mass, and men exhibited higher clearance rates than women. The simulated concentration-time profiles demonstrated that, owing to nonlinear clearance, drug concentrations decreased more than dose-proportionally with lower doses. Tapering based on an individual Bayesian approach emerged as the most promising strategy, yielding a 39% reduction in drug use across virtual populations.
Conclusions: Tapering strategies were developed for intravenous tocilizumab, offering potential application in patients with RA who have reached low disease activity or remission, pending clinical validation. The developed strategies demonstrate that the tapering of tocilizumab should be approached more carefully and in smaller steps than that of TNFi.
{"title":"Precision Dosing of Intravenous Tocilizumab: Development of Pharmacokinetic Model-Derived Tapering Strategies for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.","authors":"Femke Hooijberg, Stefan P H van den Berg, Zohra Layegh, Maureen Leeuw, Ori Elkayam, Annick de Vries, Mike Nurmohamed, Theo Rispens, Thomas P C Dorlo, Gertjan Wolbink","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tocilizumab targets the interleukin-6 receptor, and dosing is complex owing to its nonlinear clearance related to target binding. Therefore, tapering tocilizumab requires a different approach than that of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). This study aimed to identify these differences and enable personalized treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) beyond TNFi therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population pharmacokinetic model of intravenous tocilizumab was developed using data from a randomized controlled trial of dose tapering in patients with RA. Subsequent population-level Monte Carlo and individual Bayesian simulations were performed to create tapering strategies involving dose reduction and interval extension. The target trough concentration of tocilizumab was 5 mg/L. Finally, the drug savings were compared between the 2 methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pharmacokinetic of tocilizumab was described with a 2-compartment model with parallel linear (CL 0.20 L/d) and nonlinear (VM 5.2 mg/d, KM 0.19 mg/L) elimination. The linear clearance rate and central volume of distribution increased with lean body mass, and men exhibited higher clearance rates than women. The simulated concentration-time profiles demonstrated that, owing to nonlinear clearance, drug concentrations decreased more than dose-proportionally with lower doses. Tapering based on an individual Bayesian approach emerged as the most promising strategy, yielding a 39% reduction in drug use across virtual populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tapering strategies were developed for intravenous tocilizumab, offering potential application in patients with RA who have reached low disease activity or remission, pending clinical validation. The developed strategies demonstrate that the tapering of tocilizumab should be approached more carefully and in smaller steps than that of TNFi.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142605620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001274
Amelia R Cossart, Nicole M Isbel, Scott B Campbell, Brett McWhinney, Christine E Staatz
Background: Therapeutic monitoring is routinely performed to ensure tacrolimus whole-blood concentrations fall within a predefined target. Despite this, patients still experience inefficacy and toxicity that could be related to variability in free (unbound) tacrolimus exposure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare tacrolimus-free plasma (Cu), total plasma (Cp), and whole-blood (Cwb) concentrations in adult kidney transplant recipients and to characterize tacrolimus disposition across different matrices.
Methods: Twelve-hour concentration-time profiling was performed in 15 recipients, allowing simultaneous measurement of Cu, Cp, and Cwb. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental analysis. The relationship between Cwb and Cp were examined using a capacity-limited binding model, incorporating the hematocrit fraction (fHCT) to estimate maximum binding concentration (Bmax) and dissociation constant (Kd). The relationship between Cp and Cu was evaluated using a linear binding model to estimate the nonspecific binding parameter (Nplasma). Nonlinear regression analysis was used to obtain estimates of Bmax, Kd, and Nplasma.
Results: A total of 195 paired Cwb, Cp, and Cu values were collected. The median ratios of Cwb:Cp, Cp:Cu, and Cwb:Cu were 9:1, 20:1, and 138:1, respectively. Variability in free plasma exposure was large; free trough values ranged from 8 to 51 ng/L and free area-under-the-concentration-time-curve values ranged from 424 to 7160 ng·h/L. Median (range) estimates of Bmax, Kd, and Nplasma were 90.4 µg/L (22.4-752.5 µg/L), 2.36 µg/L (0-69.2 µg/L), and 0.05 (0.035-0.085), respectively. The interindividual variability (CV%) in binding parameters was considerable (Bmax 117.2%; Nplasma 32.5%).
Conclusions: Large variability was observed in tacrolimus-free plasma exposure and binding parameters. Future research to characterize the relationship between tacrolimus Cu and patient outcomes may be of benefit.
{"title":"Examining Whole Blood, Total and Free Plasma Tacrolimus in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Amelia R Cossart, Nicole M Isbel, Scott B Campbell, Brett McWhinney, Christine E Staatz","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001274","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001274","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic monitoring is routinely performed to ensure tacrolimus whole-blood concentrations fall within a predefined target. Despite this, patients still experience inefficacy and toxicity that could be related to variability in free (unbound) tacrolimus exposure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare tacrolimus-free plasma (Cu), total plasma (Cp), and whole-blood (Cwb) concentrations in adult kidney transplant recipients and to characterize tacrolimus disposition across different matrices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve-hour concentration-time profiling was performed in 15 recipients, allowing simultaneous measurement of Cu, Cp, and Cwb. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental analysis. The relationship between Cwb and Cp were examined using a capacity-limited binding model, incorporating the hematocrit fraction (fHCT) to estimate maximum binding concentration (Bmax) and dissociation constant (Kd). The relationship between Cp and Cu was evaluated using a linear binding model to estimate the nonspecific binding parameter (Nplasma). Nonlinear regression analysis was used to obtain estimates of Bmax, Kd, and Nplasma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 195 paired Cwb, Cp, and Cu values were collected. The median ratios of Cwb:Cp, Cp:Cu, and Cwb:Cu were 9:1, 20:1, and 138:1, respectively. Variability in free plasma exposure was large; free trough values ranged from 8 to 51 ng/L and free area-under-the-concentration-time-curve values ranged from 424 to 7160 ng·h/L. Median (range) estimates of Bmax, Kd, and Nplasma were 90.4 µg/L (22.4-752.5 µg/L), 2.36 µg/L (0-69.2 µg/L), and 0.05 (0.035-0.085), respectively. The interindividual variability (CV%) in binding parameters was considerable (Bmax 117.2%; Nplasma 32.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Large variability was observed in tacrolimus-free plasma exposure and binding parameters. Future research to characterize the relationship between tacrolimus Cu and patient outcomes may be of benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142605619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-06DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001265
Hailemichael Z Hishe, Sophie L Stocker, Lisa K Stamp, Nicola Dalbeth, Tony R Merriman, Daniel F B Wright
Background: Allopurinol dose reduction proportional to creatinine clearance (CLcr) results in suboptimal urate lowering in patients with gout. Similarly, diuretic therapy reduces oxypurinol clearance but is unexpectedly associated with the need for higher allopurinol doses to achieve the serum urate target (<0.36 mmol/L). The authors aimed to clarify the relationship between oxypurinol exposure and urate-lowering response in patients with gout at different stages of chronic kidney disease and those taking diuretics to determine the implications for maintenance dose selection.
Methods: Oxypurinol and urate data from 5 clinical studies were available. Model-derived steady-state oxypurinol areas under the concentration-time curves (AUCss0-tau) were estimated using a Bayesian methodology. The observed response metrics included the percentage reduction in urate from baseline and achievement of the target urate level. Exposure-response was explored graphically and using logistic regression. In addition, the influence of chronic kidney disease and diuretic use on the allopurinol dose and oxypurinol AUCss0-tau requirements to achieve the serum urate target were explored.
Results: Data from 258 patients with gout taking allopurinol representing 1288 paired steady-state oxypurinol and serum urate measurements were available. Higher oxypurinol exposure seems to be required for urate-lowering response normalization and achieve the serum urate target in individuals with reduced kidney function and those taking diuretics. However, allopurinol dose requirements were reduced by 2-fold at the extremes of kidney function and unchanged in those taking or not taking diuretics.
Conclusions: A lower allopurinol maintenance dose was required in patients with reduced kidney function (CLcr <30 mL/min), but this was not proportional to CLcr. Diuretic therapy did not influence allopurinol dose requirements.
{"title":"Untangling the Exposure-Response Relationship of Allopurinol in the Setting of Chronic Kidney Disease and Diuretic Use: Implications for Dosing.","authors":"Hailemichael Z Hishe, Sophie L Stocker, Lisa K Stamp, Nicola Dalbeth, Tony R Merriman, Daniel F B Wright","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001265","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allopurinol dose reduction proportional to creatinine clearance (CLcr) results in suboptimal urate lowering in patients with gout. Similarly, diuretic therapy reduces oxypurinol clearance but is unexpectedly associated with the need for higher allopurinol doses to achieve the serum urate target (<0.36 mmol/L). The authors aimed to clarify the relationship between oxypurinol exposure and urate-lowering response in patients with gout at different stages of chronic kidney disease and those taking diuretics to determine the implications for maintenance dose selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Oxypurinol and urate data from 5 clinical studies were available. Model-derived steady-state oxypurinol areas under the concentration-time curves (AUCss0-tau) were estimated using a Bayesian methodology. The observed response metrics included the percentage reduction in urate from baseline and achievement of the target urate level. Exposure-response was explored graphically and using logistic regression. In addition, the influence of chronic kidney disease and diuretic use on the allopurinol dose and oxypurinol AUCss0-tau requirements to achieve the serum urate target were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 258 patients with gout taking allopurinol representing 1288 paired steady-state oxypurinol and serum urate measurements were available. Higher oxypurinol exposure seems to be required for urate-lowering response normalization and achieve the serum urate target in individuals with reduced kidney function and those taking diuretics. However, allopurinol dose requirements were reduced by 2-fold at the extremes of kidney function and unchanged in those taking or not taking diuretics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A lower allopurinol maintenance dose was required in patients with reduced kidney function (CLcr <30 mL/min), but this was not proportional to CLcr. Diuretic therapy did not influence allopurinol dose requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-05DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001276
Olga Millán, Judit Julian, Mercè Brunet
Abstract: The use of noninvasive biomarkers may reduce the need for biopsy and guide immunosuppression adjustments during transplantation. The scientific community in solid organ transplantation currently considers that chemokines, T- and B-cell immunophenotypes, and gene expression, among other molecular biomarkers, have great potential as diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for graft evolution; however, in clinical practice, few valid early biomarkers have emerged. This review focuses on the most relevant scientific advances in this field in the last 5 years regarding the role of 3 biomarkers: miRNAs, chemokines, and ddcf-DNA, in both adult and pediatric populations. An update was provided on the scores based on the combination of these biomarkers. The most-featured articles were identified through a literature search of the PubMed database. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the potential clinical applications of these biomarkers in the diagnosis and prediction of graft outcomes and discusses the reasons why none have been implemented in clinical practice to date. Translating these biomarkers into routine clinical practice and combining them with pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetic monitoring is challenging; however, it is the key to present/future individualized immunosuppressive therapies. It is essential that they be shown to be applicable and robust in real-life patient conditions and properly evaluate their added value when combined with the standard-of-care factor monitoring for graft clinical assessment. Partnership strategies among scientists, academic institutions, consortia, including expert working groups and scientific societies, and pharmaceutical and/or biotechnology companies should promote the development of prospective, randomized, multicenter intervention studies for adequate clinical validation of these biomarkers and their monitoring frequency, and their commercialization to make them available to transplant physicians.
摘要:非侵入性生物标志物的使用可减少活组织检查的需要,并指导移植过程中免疫抑制的调整。目前,实体器官移植领域的科学界认为,趋化因子、T 细胞和 B 细胞免疫表型以及基因表达等分子生物标志物作为诊断和预测移植物演变的生物标志物具有巨大的潜力;然而,在临床实践中,有效的早期生物标志物却寥寥无几。本综述重点介绍了过去五年中该领域最相关的科学进展,涉及 miRNA、趋化因子和 ddcf-DNA 这三种生物标志物在成人和儿童人群中的作用。根据这些生物标志物的组合对评分进行了更新。通过对 PubMed 数据库进行文献检索,确定了最具特色的文章。本综述全面分析了这些生物标志物在诊断和预测移植物预后方面的潜在临床应用,并讨论了迄今为止尚未在临床实践中应用的原因。将这些生物标志物转化为常规临床实践并与药物遗传学和药代动力学监测相结合具有挑战性;然而,这是目前/未来个体化免疫抑制疗法的关键。至关重要的是,必须证明它们在实际患者病情中的适用性和稳健性,并适当评估它们与移植物临床评估的标准护理因子监测相结合后的附加值。科学家、学术机构、联合体(包括专家工作组和科学协会)以及制药和/或生物技术公司之间的合作战略应促进前瞻性、随机、多中心干预研究的发展,以便对这些生物标志物及其监测频率进行充分的临床验证,并促进其商业化,使移植医生能够获得这些生物标志物。
{"title":"miRNAs, dd-cf-DNA, and Chemokines as Potential Noninvasive Biomarkers for the Assessment of Clinical Graft Evolution and Personalized Immunosuppression Requirement in Solid Organ Transplantation.","authors":"Olga Millán, Judit Julian, Mercè Brunet","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001276","DOIUrl":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001276","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The use of noninvasive biomarkers may reduce the need for biopsy and guide immunosuppression adjustments during transplantation. The scientific community in solid organ transplantation currently considers that chemokines, T- and B-cell immunophenotypes, and gene expression, among other molecular biomarkers, have great potential as diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for graft evolution; however, in clinical practice, few valid early biomarkers have emerged. This review focuses on the most relevant scientific advances in this field in the last 5 years regarding the role of 3 biomarkers: miRNAs, chemokines, and ddcf-DNA, in both adult and pediatric populations. An update was provided on the scores based on the combination of these biomarkers. The most-featured articles were identified through a literature search of the PubMed database. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the potential clinical applications of these biomarkers in the diagnosis and prediction of graft outcomes and discusses the reasons why none have been implemented in clinical practice to date. Translating these biomarkers into routine clinical practice and combining them with pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetic monitoring is challenging; however, it is the key to present/future individualized immunosuppressive therapies. It is essential that they be shown to be applicable and robust in real-life patient conditions and properly evaluate their added value when combined with the standard-of-care factor monitoring for graft clinical assessment. Partnership strategies among scientists, academic institutions, consortia, including expert working groups and scientific societies, and pharmaceutical and/or biotechnology companies should promote the development of prospective, randomized, multicenter intervention studies for adequate clinical validation of these biomarkers and their monitoring frequency, and their commercialization to make them available to transplant physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001263
Olav Spigset
{"title":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Psychotropic Drugs: What We Know, What We Don't, and the Controversies.","authors":"Olav Spigset","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001263","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-24DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001270
Jeremiah D Momper, Raman Venkataramanan, Arin S Jantz, Diane M Cibrik, Kelly Birdwell, Tk Nguyen, Brian M Masters, Samir J Patel
Background: For extended-release drug formulations, effective half-life (t1/2eff) is a relevant pharmacokinetic parameter to inform dosing strategies and time to reach steady state. Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant commonly used for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in transplant patients, is available as both immediate- and extended-release formulations. To the best of our knowledge, the t1/2eff of tacrolimus from these different formulations has not yet been assessed. The objective of this study was to characterize the t1/2eff and terminal half-life (t1/2z) of an extended-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation (LCPT) and twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac).
Methods: A noncompartmental analysis of pharmacokinetic data obtained from a phase 2 study in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving either LCPT or IR-Tac was conducted. Intensive blood sampling was performed on days 1, 7, and 14, and tacrolimus whole blood concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method. T1/2eff was estimated using within-participant accumulation ratios. T1/2z was estimated by linear regression of the terminal phase of the concentration versus time profile.
Results: The median accumulation ratios of LCPT and IR-Tac on day 14 were 3.18 and 2.06, respectively.The median (interquartile range; IQR) t1/2eff for LCPT at day 14 of dosing was 48.4 (37.4-77.9) hours, whereas the t1/2z was 20.3 (17.6-22.9) hours. For IR-Tac, the median (IQR) t1/2eff and t1/2z on day 14 were 12.5 (8.8-23.0) hours and 12.2 (9.2-15.7) hours, respectively.
Conclusions: Consistent with its prolonged release of tacrolimus, LCPT demonstrated a higher accumulation ratio and a longer t1/2eff compared with IR-Tac. These findings underscore the pharmacokinetic differences between different drug formulations of the same moiety and may help inform dose adjustments for LCPT in kidney transplantation.
{"title":"Evaluation of Effective Half-Life and Its Impact on Time to Steady State for Oral MeltDose Tacrolimus (LCPT) in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Jeremiah D Momper, Raman Venkataramanan, Arin S Jantz, Diane M Cibrik, Kelly Birdwell, Tk Nguyen, Brian M Masters, Samir J Patel","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001270","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001270","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For extended-release drug formulations, effective half-life (t1/2eff) is a relevant pharmacokinetic parameter to inform dosing strategies and time to reach steady state. Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant commonly used for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in transplant patients, is available as both immediate- and extended-release formulations. To the best of our knowledge, the t1/2eff of tacrolimus from these different formulations has not yet been assessed. The objective of this study was to characterize the t1/2eff and terminal half-life (t1/2z) of an extended-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation (LCPT) and twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A noncompartmental analysis of pharmacokinetic data obtained from a phase 2 study in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving either LCPT or IR-Tac was conducted. Intensive blood sampling was performed on days 1, 7, and 14, and tacrolimus whole blood concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method. T1/2eff was estimated using within-participant accumulation ratios. T1/2z was estimated by linear regression of the terminal phase of the concentration versus time profile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median accumulation ratios of LCPT and IR-Tac on day 14 were 3.18 and 2.06, respectively.The median (interquartile range; IQR) t1/2eff for LCPT at day 14 of dosing was 48.4 (37.4-77.9) hours, whereas the t1/2z was 20.3 (17.6-22.9) hours. For IR-Tac, the median (IQR) t1/2eff and t1/2z on day 14 were 12.5 (8.8-23.0) hours and 12.2 (9.2-15.7) hours, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with its prolonged release of tacrolimus, LCPT demonstrated a higher accumulation ratio and a longer t1/2eff compared with IR-Tac. These findings underscore the pharmacokinetic differences between different drug formulations of the same moiety and may help inform dose adjustments for LCPT in kidney transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142508527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-24DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001273
Julia O Nascimento, Edlaine R Costa, Rita Estrela, Fernanda L Moreira
Background: Methods for measuring drug levels in the body are crucial for improving therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and personalized medicine. In solid-organ transplants, TDM is essential for the management of immunosuppressive drugs to avoid toxicity and organ rejection. Everolimus is a commonly used immunosuppressant with a small range of safe doses; therefore, it is important to adjust the dose according to each patient's needs. Therefore, reliable methods are required to accurately measure everolimus levels. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive and updated narrative review of chromatographic bioanalytical methods for everolimus quantification.
Methods: The authors searched for original research articles published between 2013 and 2023 in Scopus and PubMed and found 295 articles after removing duplicates. Based on their titles and summaries, 30 articles were selected for a detailed review and 25 articles were included in the final analysis.
Results: Among the 25 studies, 16 used protein precipitation, mainly with methanol, to prepare the samples, 12 used high-performance liquid chromatography, 11 used ultra-performance liquid chromatography, and 2 used both. Almost all the studies (24 of 25) used tandem mass spectrometry for detection, whereas only 1 used ultraviolet.
Conclusions: This comprehensive review of bioanalytical methods for measuring everolimus using chromatography is a useful resource for researchers developing bioanalytical methods for TDM applications. Future trends in everolimus measurement include achieving lower detection limits, owing to the trend of reducing drug doses in therapy by improving sample extraction techniques and using more sensitive methods.
{"title":"A Narrative Review of Chromatographic Bioanalytical Methods for Quantifying Everolimus in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Applications.","authors":"Julia O Nascimento, Edlaine R Costa, Rita Estrela, Fernanda L Moreira","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001273","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001273","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Methods for measuring drug levels in the body are crucial for improving therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and personalized medicine. In solid-organ transplants, TDM is essential for the management of immunosuppressive drugs to avoid toxicity and organ rejection. Everolimus is a commonly used immunosuppressant with a small range of safe doses; therefore, it is important to adjust the dose according to each patient's needs. Therefore, reliable methods are required to accurately measure everolimus levels. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive and updated narrative review of chromatographic bioanalytical methods for everolimus quantification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors searched for original research articles published between 2013 and 2023 in Scopus and PubMed and found 295 articles after removing duplicates. Based on their titles and summaries, 30 articles were selected for a detailed review and 25 articles were included in the final analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 25 studies, 16 used protein precipitation, mainly with methanol, to prepare the samples, 12 used high-performance liquid chromatography, 11 used ultra-performance liquid chromatography, and 2 used both. Almost all the studies (24 of 25) used tandem mass spectrometry for detection, whereas only 1 used ultraviolet.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This comprehensive review of bioanalytical methods for measuring everolimus using chromatography is a useful resource for researchers developing bioanalytical methods for TDM applications. Future trends in everolimus measurement include achieving lower detection limits, owing to the trend of reducing drug doses in therapy by improving sample extraction techniques and using more sensitive methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142508526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}