Assessing Climate Change Impacts on Yield of “Dual-Priority” Water Rights in Carryover Systems at Catchment Scale

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Water Resources Research Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1029/2023wr035376
Peizhen Ren, Michael Stewardson, Murray Peel, Margot Turner, Andrew John
{"title":"Assessing Climate Change Impacts on Yield of “Dual-Priority” Water Rights in Carryover Systems at Catchment Scale","authors":"Peizhen Ren, Michael Stewardson, Murray Peel, Margot Turner, Andrew John","doi":"10.1029/2023wr035376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Future water availability is threatened by changes in both climate and water demand. Water rights with differing priorities are an important foundation of demand-side tools (e.g., buyback, water pricing, and water market) to improve water use efficiency and reduce water scarcity, especially in highly regulated river systems. This paper assesses the impact of climate change on water yields from carryover storage with dual-priority (high/low) water rights allocation systems using a simple and rapid analytical method. The method characterizes reservoir inflows using readily available flow characteristics (annual mean and <i>C</i><sub><i>v</i></sub>). We evaluate this method against a water resource simulation model in the Goulburn River basin, Australia. In general, our analytical “dual-priority” Gould-Dincer model reproduces water allocation estimates from the simulation model. We further demonstrate this method across 12 Australian catchments to investigate the climate change impact on “dual-priority” water rights yield at the catchment scale. The hydrological projections show decreasing mean annual runoff and increasing annual runoff variability, except for some catchments in northern Australia. Water yield for high-priority water rights (HPWRs) and low-priority water rights (LPWRs) decreases for most catchments except for some catchments in northern Australia. South Dandalup in the 2070s (RCP8.5) shows the largest percentage decrease in HPWR and LPWR yield (about −53.53% and −56.81%, respectively). Our results show that changes in mean annual inflow have a more significant influence on water yield of HPWR and LPWR than <i>C</i><sub><i>v</i></sub>. Overall, the simple method provides a rapid assessment of water yields with “dual-priority” water rights which is applicable across multiple sites at regional or even global scale.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr035376","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Future water availability is threatened by changes in both climate and water demand. Water rights with differing priorities are an important foundation of demand-side tools (e.g., buyback, water pricing, and water market) to improve water use efficiency and reduce water scarcity, especially in highly regulated river systems. This paper assesses the impact of climate change on water yields from carryover storage with dual-priority (high/low) water rights allocation systems using a simple and rapid analytical method. The method characterizes reservoir inflows using readily available flow characteristics (annual mean and Cv). We evaluate this method against a water resource simulation model in the Goulburn River basin, Australia. In general, our analytical “dual-priority” Gould-Dincer model reproduces water allocation estimates from the simulation model. We further demonstrate this method across 12 Australian catchments to investigate the climate change impact on “dual-priority” water rights yield at the catchment scale. The hydrological projections show decreasing mean annual runoff and increasing annual runoff variability, except for some catchments in northern Australia. Water yield for high-priority water rights (HPWRs) and low-priority water rights (LPWRs) decreases for most catchments except for some catchments in northern Australia. South Dandalup in the 2070s (RCP8.5) shows the largest percentage decrease in HPWR and LPWR yield (about −53.53% and −56.81%, respectively). Our results show that changes in mean annual inflow have a more significant influence on water yield of HPWR and LPWR than Cv. Overall, the simple method provides a rapid assessment of water yields with “dual-priority” water rights which is applicable across multiple sites at regional or even global scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在流域尺度上评估气候变化对结转系统中 "双重优先 "水权产量的影响
未来的可用水量受到气候和水资源需求变化的威胁。不同优先级的水权是需求侧工具(如回购、水价和水市场)的重要基础,可提高用水效率,减少水资源短缺,尤其是在高度管制的河流系统中。本文采用一种简单快速的分析方法,评估了气候变化对采用双优先(高/低)水权分配制度的结转水库出水量的影响。该方法利用现成的流量特征(年均值和 Cv)来描述水库流入量。我们根据澳大利亚古尔本河流域的水资源模拟模型对该方法进行了评估。总体而言,我们的 "双优先 "古尔德-丁塞尔分析模型再现了模拟模型的水资源分配估算值。我们在澳大利亚的 12 个流域进一步展示了这种方法,以研究气候变化对流域范围内 "双优先 "水权产量的影响。水文预测结果表明,除澳大利亚北部的一些集水区外,年平均径流量在减少,而年径流量变异性在增加。除澳大利亚北部的一些集水区外,大多数集水区的高优先级水权(HPWR)和低优先级水权(LPWR)产水量都有所下降。2070 年代(RCP8.5)南丹达卢普的高优先级水权和低优先级水权产量降幅最大(分别约为-53.53%和-56.81%)。我们的结果表明,年平均流入量的变化对 HPWR 和 LPWR 产水量的影响比 Cv 更显著。总之,这种简单的方法可以快速评估 "双优先 "水权的产水量,适用于区域甚至全球范围内的多个地点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
期刊最新文献
Quantifying Streambed Grain Size, Uncertainty, and Hydrobiogeochemical Parameters Using Machine Learning Model YOLO iFLOW: A Framework and GUI to Quantify Effective Thermal Diffusivity and Advection in Permeable Materials From Temperature Time Series Assessing Potential Groundwater Storage Capacity for Sustainable Groundwater Management in the Transitioning Post-Subsidence Metropolitan Area Zeta Potential of Supercritical CO2-Water-Sandstone Systems and Its Correlation With Wettability and Residual Subsurface Trapping of CO2 Measuring River Surface Velocity Using UAS-Borne Doppler Radar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1