Effects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Gait Parameters in Individuals With Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Perceptual and Motor Skills Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1177/00315125231226039
Aziz Dengiz, Emre Baskan
{"title":"Effects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Gait Parameters in Individuals With Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Aziz Dengiz, Emre Baskan","doi":"10.1177/00315125231226039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke is a significant health problem that may result in long-term functional deficits. Balance and walking problems are among the most common post-stroke deficits, and they may negatively affect quality of life. Our aim in this study was to investigate the effects of cervical mobilization on balance and gait parameters after stroke. Participants were 24 adults (aged 30-65 years), who scored 24 or above on the Standardized Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and no more than 3 on the Modified Rankin scale. Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental Bobath therapy and cervical mobilization group (<i>n</i> = 12) or a control group who received Bobath therapy and a sham application (<i>n</i> = 12). Both groups received 60 minutes of Bobath therapy three times a week for four weeks; additionally, the experimental group received 15 minutes of cervical mobilization in each session, while the control group received 15 minutes of spinal sham mobilization each session. Pre and post treatment, we assessed all participants' demographic characteristics, gait parameters, balance parameters, and forward head posture values using a clinical data assessment form, spatiotemporal gait analysis (LEGSystm), portable computerized kinesthetic balance device (SportKAT 550), and craniovertebral angle (CVA), respectively. The groups showed no significant differences in their initial demographic and clinical characteristics (age, sex, stroke duration and disability levels.). In comparing changes on variables of interest, we observed significant experimental versus control group improvements in balance parameters except for their left side balance score (right side, left side, forward, backward and total balance scores were significant at <i>p =</i> .003, <i>p</i> = .089, <i>p</i> < .001, <i>p</i> = .022, <i>p</i> < .001, respectively), gait parameters (stride number, stride length, stride time, stride velocity, cadance at <i>p</i> = .007, <i>p</i> = .019, <i>p</i> = .013, <i>p</i> = .005, <i>p</i> = .001, respectively) and CVA (<i>p</i> < .001). Also, there were findings in favor of the experimental group on the modified timed up and go test on walk out, mid turn, walk back and total times (<i>p</i> = .028, <i>p</i> = .001, <i>p</i> = .016, and <i>p</i> = .001, respectively),but not for sit-to-stand time or stand-to-sit time. Clinicians involved in stroke rehabilitation should assess and treat the cervical region to enhance rehabilitation effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"469-488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125231226039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stroke is a significant health problem that may result in long-term functional deficits. Balance and walking problems are among the most common post-stroke deficits, and they may negatively affect quality of life. Our aim in this study was to investigate the effects of cervical mobilization on balance and gait parameters after stroke. Participants were 24 adults (aged 30-65 years), who scored 24 or above on the Standardized Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and no more than 3 on the Modified Rankin scale. Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental Bobath therapy and cervical mobilization group (n = 12) or a control group who received Bobath therapy and a sham application (n = 12). Both groups received 60 minutes of Bobath therapy three times a week for four weeks; additionally, the experimental group received 15 minutes of cervical mobilization in each session, while the control group received 15 minutes of spinal sham mobilization each session. Pre and post treatment, we assessed all participants' demographic characteristics, gait parameters, balance parameters, and forward head posture values using a clinical data assessment form, spatiotemporal gait analysis (LEGSystm), portable computerized kinesthetic balance device (SportKAT 550), and craniovertebral angle (CVA), respectively. The groups showed no significant differences in their initial demographic and clinical characteristics (age, sex, stroke duration and disability levels.). In comparing changes on variables of interest, we observed significant experimental versus control group improvements in balance parameters except for their left side balance score (right side, left side, forward, backward and total balance scores were significant at p = .003, p = .089, p < .001, p = .022, p < .001, respectively), gait parameters (stride number, stride length, stride time, stride velocity, cadance at p = .007, p = .019, p = .013, p = .005, p = .001, respectively) and CVA (p < .001). Also, there were findings in favor of the experimental group on the modified timed up and go test on walk out, mid turn, walk back and total times (p = .028, p = .001, p = .016, and p = .001, respectively),but not for sit-to-stand time or stand-to-sit time. Clinicians involved in stroke rehabilitation should assess and treat the cervical region to enhance rehabilitation effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈椎活动对脑卒中患者平衡和步态参数的影响:随机对照试验
中风是一种严重的健康问题,可能导致长期的功能障碍。平衡和行走问题是中风后最常见的功能障碍之一,可能会对生活质量产生负面影响。本研究旨在探讨颈椎活动对中风后平衡和步态参数的影响。研究对象为 24 名成年人(30-65 岁),他们在标准化小型精神状态检查(MMSE)中的得分均在 24 分或以上,在修正的兰金量表中的得分不超过 3 分。参试者被随机分配到博巴思疗法和颈椎活动实验组(12 人)或接受博巴思疗法和假应用的对照组(12 人)。两组均接受为期四周、每周三次、每次 60 分钟的博巴思疗法;此外,实验组每次接受 15 分钟的颈椎活动,而对照组每次接受 15 分钟的脊柱假性活动。治疗前和治疗后,我们分别使用临床数据评估表、时空步态分析仪(LEGSystm)、便携式电脑动觉平衡装置(SportKAT 550)和颅椎角(CVA)评估了所有参与者的人口统计学特征、步态参数、平衡参数和前头姿势值。两组患者的初始人口统计学特征和临床特征(年龄、性别、中风持续时间和残疾程度)无明显差异。在比较相关变量的变化时,我们观察到实验组与对照组相比,除左侧平衡得分外,其他平衡参数均有显著改善(右侧、左侧、前进、后退和总平衡得分的显著性分别为 p = .003、p = .089、p < .001、p = .022、p < .001)、步态参数(步数、步长、步幅、步速、步频分别为 p = .007、p = .019、p = .013、p = .005、p = .001)和 CVA(p < .001)。此外,在改良的定时起立行走测试中,实验组在走出去、中途转身、走回来和总时间上的结果也对实验组有利(分别为 p = .028、p = .001、p = .016 和 p = .001),但在坐到站的时间或站到坐的时间上对实验组不利。参与中风康复的临床医生应该对颈椎区域进行评估和治疗,以提高康复效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Fundamental Motor Skill Domains and Physical Fitness Components in 5-11-Year-Old Children. Immediate Effects of Custom Foot Orthoses on Postural Balance and Pain in Obese Middle-Aged Women With Plantar Fasciitis. Reliability and Validity of the Trunk Control Measurement Scale in Children With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Magnitude and Direction of Interlimb Asymmetry and the Association of Interlimb Asymmetry with Physical Performance in Judo Athletes with Visual Impairment. The Effects of Telerehabilitation-Based Exercise Therapy on Motor and Non-Motor Clinical Outcomes in Adults With Facial Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1