Does Rounding Order Bias Discharge Efficiency? Predictors of Discharge Timing on an Academic Urology Service.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000415
Charles J Paul, Bradley A Erickson, Kenneth G Nepple, Chad R Tracy
{"title":"Does Rounding Order Bias Discharge Efficiency? Predictors of Discharge Timing on an Academic Urology Service.","authors":"Charles J Paul, Bradley A Erickson, Kenneth G Nepple, Chad R Tracy","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>No previous works have analyzed whether the order in which surgical teams see patients on morning rounds affects discharge efficiency at teaching hospitals. We obtained perioperative urologic surgery timing data at our academic institution from 2014 to 2019. We limited the analysis to routine postoperative day 1 discharges. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine whether various hospital and patient factors were associated with discharge timing. We analyzed 1,494 patients. Average discharge order time was 11:22 a.m. and hospital discharge 1:24 p.m. Univariate regression revealed earlier discharge order time for patients seen later in rounds by 4 minutes per sequential room cluster (p = .013) and by 12 minutes per cluster when excluding short-stay patients. Multivariate analysis revealed discharge order placement did not vary significantly by rounding order. However, time of hospital discharge did (p < .001), likely due to speed of discharge in the designated short-stay units. Attending physician was the most consistent predictor in variations of discharge timing, with statistical significance across all measured outcomes. Patients seen later in rounding progression received earlier discharge orders, but this relationship does not remain in multivariate modeling or translate to earlier discharge. These findings have helped guide quality improvement efforts focused on discharge efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"46 1","pages":"12-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: No previous works have analyzed whether the order in which surgical teams see patients on morning rounds affects discharge efficiency at teaching hospitals. We obtained perioperative urologic surgery timing data at our academic institution from 2014 to 2019. We limited the analysis to routine postoperative day 1 discharges. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine whether various hospital and patient factors were associated with discharge timing. We analyzed 1,494 patients. Average discharge order time was 11:22 a.m. and hospital discharge 1:24 p.m. Univariate regression revealed earlier discharge order time for patients seen later in rounds by 4 minutes per sequential room cluster (p = .013) and by 12 minutes per cluster when excluding short-stay patients. Multivariate analysis revealed discharge order placement did not vary significantly by rounding order. However, time of hospital discharge did (p < .001), likely due to speed of discharge in the designated short-stay units. Attending physician was the most consistent predictor in variations of discharge timing, with statistical significance across all measured outcomes. Patients seen later in rounding progression received earlier discharge orders, but this relationship does not remain in multivariate modeling or translate to earlier discharge. These findings have helped guide quality improvement efforts focused on discharge efficiency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
舍入顺序是否会影响出院效率?泌尿外科学术服务中出院时间的预测因素。
摘要:此前没有任何研究分析了在教学医院,手术团队在晨间查房时接诊患者的顺序是否会影响出院效率。我们获得了本学术机构 2014 年至 2019 年泌尿外科围手术期的时间数据。我们的分析仅限于常规术后第 1 天出院患者。我们进行了单变量和多变量分析,以确定医院和患者的各种因素是否与出院时间相关。我们对 1494 名患者进行了分析。单变量回归结果显示,查房较晚的患者出院时间较早,每个序贯病房组的出院时间提前了 4 分钟(p = 0.013),如果排除短期住院患者,则每个序贯病房组的出院时间提前了 12 分钟。多变量分析显示,出院医嘱的下达并不因查房顺序的不同而有显著差异。但是,出院时间却有显著差异(p < .001),这可能是由于指定的短期住院病房的出院速度所致。主治医生是预测出院时间变化最一致的因素,在所有测量结果中都具有统计学意义。查房进展较晚的患者收到的出院指令较早,但这种关系在多变量建模中并不存在,也不会转化为出院时间的提前。这些发现有助于指导以出院效率为重点的质量改进工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Workplace Violence Reporting in a Multisite Hospital Setting: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Preoperative Optimization of Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Single Institution Cohort. Personalizing Quality Improvement: Addressing Anticoagulation Gaps in Atrial Fibrillation. Implementation of an Evidence-Based Treatment Protocol and Order Set for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome. Improving Time to Antibiotics for Long-Bone Open Fractures: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1