Response time of mixed platoons with traditional and autonomous vehicles in field trials: impact assessment on flow stability and safety

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION Transportmetrica A-Transport Science Pub Date : 2025-09-02 Epub Date: 2023-12-29 DOI:10.1080/23249935.2023.2298498
Tanmay Das , Ishtiak Ahmed , Billy M. Williams , Nagui M. Rouphail
{"title":"Response time of mixed platoons with traditional and autonomous vehicles in field trials: impact assessment on flow stability and safety","authors":"Tanmay Das ,&nbsp;Ishtiak Ahmed ,&nbsp;Billy M. Williams ,&nbsp;Nagui M. Rouphail","doi":"10.1080/23249935.2023.2298498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the response times of autonomous vehicles (AVs) equipped with adaptive cruise control (ACC) and traditional human-driven vehicles (TVs) in mixed traffic scenarios. The primary objective is to assess how these response times impact the stability and safety of mixed traffic flow, considering the growing prevalence of ACC technology in vehicles worldwide. Utilising a trajectory dataset from OpenACC totalling 3389.70 s, this research introduces a response time estimation framework that combines cross-correlation and partial autocorrelation techniques. The study calibrates Gazis, Herman, and Rothery's (GHR) car-following model to evaluate mixed traffic flow stability and employs a modified time-to-collision (MTTC) surrogate for safety analysis. The study also delves into the influence of vehicle manufacturer diversity on study outcomes. Key findings reveal that the AVs exhibit significantly longer response times, ranging from 1.10–3.20 s, compared to the 0.30–1.90-second range of traditional vehicles (<em>p</em> value &lt; 0.005). These extended response times in AVs contribute to prolonged traffic flow instability and increased traffic conflicts. Moreover, the type of lead vehicle does not significantly affect the response times of either AVs or TVs (<em>p</em> value &gt; 0.005). The study also highlights that vehicle manufacturer diversity does not substantially affect these response times. Additionally, the examination of fitted GHR parameters underscores AVs’ heightened sensitivity to spacing and relative speed, providing insights into AV dynamics in the presence of mixed traffic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48871,"journal":{"name":"Transportmetrica A-Transport Science","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportmetrica A-Transport Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S232499352300324X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the response times of autonomous vehicles (AVs) equipped with adaptive cruise control (ACC) and traditional human-driven vehicles (TVs) in mixed traffic scenarios. The primary objective is to assess how these response times impact the stability and safety of mixed traffic flow, considering the growing prevalence of ACC technology in vehicles worldwide. Utilising a trajectory dataset from OpenACC totalling 3389.70 s, this research introduces a response time estimation framework that combines cross-correlation and partial autocorrelation techniques. The study calibrates Gazis, Herman, and Rothery's (GHR) car-following model to evaluate mixed traffic flow stability and employs a modified time-to-collision (MTTC) surrogate for safety analysis. The study also delves into the influence of vehicle manufacturer diversity on study outcomes. Key findings reveal that the AVs exhibit significantly longer response times, ranging from 1.10–3.20 s, compared to the 0.30–1.90-second range of traditional vehicles (p value < 0.005). These extended response times in AVs contribute to prolonged traffic flow instability and increased traffic conflicts. Moreover, the type of lead vehicle does not significantly affect the response times of either AVs or TVs (p value > 0.005). The study also highlights that vehicle manufacturer diversity does not substantially affect these response times. Additionally, the examination of fitted GHR parameters underscores AVs’ heightened sensitivity to spacing and relative speed, providing insights into AV dynamics in the presence of mixed traffic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实地试验中传统车辆和自动驾驶车辆混合排的响应时间:对流动稳定性和安全性影响的评估
本研究调查了混合交通场景中配备自适应巡航控制系统(ACC)的自动驾驶汽车(AV)和传统人工驾驶汽车(TV)的响应时间。初步研究结果表明,自动驾驶车辆的响应时间比传统的人工驾驶车辆短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportmetrica A-Transport Science
Transportmetrica A-Transport Science TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
12.10%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Transportmetrica A provides a forum for original discourse in transport science. The international journal''s focus is on the scientific approach to transport research methodology and empirical analysis of moving people and goods. Papers related to all aspects of transportation are welcome. A rigorous peer review that involves editor screening and anonymous refereeing for submitted articles facilitates quality output.
期刊最新文献
An efficient hyperpath-based algorithm for the capacitated transit equilibrium assignment problem An improved alternating direction method of multipliers for solving deterministic user equilibrium Headway regularity as an attribute for classifying bus drivers In loving memory of Professor Richard Allsop: a great loss to HKSTS and the transportation community A synchronization-constraints-based dual bands method of traffic signal optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1